A number of members of the Supreme Council of State held a session in which Muhammad Takala was elected President of the Council in a session chaired by First Deputy Masoud Obaid, whose presidency said that the number of attendees reached 72 members.
The session witnessed Takala competing with Council members Naima El Hami and Idriss Boufayed, with Takala receiving 55 votes, compared to 8 votes for Naima El Hami, and 5 for Boufayed, with two white papers.
In the same session, 49 members elected Masoud Obaid as first deputy of the Council, and 42 members elected Musa Faraj as second deputy.
In his response to the holding of the session, Khaled Al-Mishri considered that the call for a re-election session for the presidency of the Council, headed by Takala, is worthless and issued by an unqualified person.
Al-Mishri, in a statement to Al-Ahrar, said that this session is only a new chapter to strengthen the division of the Council, expressing his adherence to the “legitimacy” of the presidency of the Council until the dispute is resolved through the judiciary.
Last August 6, an election paper within the corridors of the Supreme Council sparked controversy among members regarding the resolution of the presidential elections, as the paper carried the name of Muhammad Takala, but in a box other than the one designated for writing names.
Some members counted the paper in favor of Takala, making him equal to the candidate Khaled Al-Mishri in the number of votes, while other members considered it invalid, and the dispute still exists without resolving the controversy over the name of the Speaker of the Council.
Source: Libya Al-Ahrar
Interview Between Time.news Editor and Political Expert Regarding the Election of Muhammad Takala
Time.news Editor: Welcome to Time.news, where we discuss the latest developments in global politics. Today, I’m joined by Dr. Amina Saeed, a political analyst and expert on Libyan politics. Dr. Saeed, thank you for being here today.
Dr. Amina Saeed: Thank you for having me! It’s a pleasure to be here.
Editor: Let’s dive right into it. Recently, there was a significant election within the Supreme Council of State in Libya where Muhammad Takala was elected as President. What do you make of this development?
Dr. Saeed: This is indeed a pivotal moment for the Supreme Council of State. Takala’s election, especially after a session chaired by First Deputy Masoud Obaid with 72 members present, indicates a certain level of unity within the council, which is crucial given the complex political landscape of Libya.
Editor: Interesting. The session included competitive candidates like Naima El Hami and Idris. How significant is the presence of diverse candidates in such a political process?
Dr. Saeed: The presence of multiple candidates, especially women like Naima El Hami, demonstrates the diversity and evolving nature of Libyan politics. This highlights the growing inclusivity, which is vital for establishing a more representative governance structure. It can also inspire more public engagement in the political process.
Editor: I see your point. What challenges do you think Takala will face in his presidency, especially with such competition involved?
Dr. Saeed: Takala will face several challenges. Firstly, he must navigate the expectations of different factions within the council. With various political interests at play, it will be crucial for him to foster collaboration and consensus. Additionally, external pressures from international bodies and the ongoing economic difficulties in Libya will require diplomatic skill and decisive action.
Editor: Given the historical context of Libya’s political struggles, could you outline how Takala’s leadership could impact future political stability?
Dr. Saeed: Absolutely. Takala’s leadership will be instrumental in either reinforcing or reshaping the political landscape. If he can build trust and effectively communicate with both council members and the public, he could pave the way for a more stable governance framework. However, failure to address key issues, such as security, economic recovery, and social cohesion, could exacerbate tensions.
Editor: What role do you think the public will play in this political shift?
Dr. Saeed: The public’s role is crucial. There is a growing demand for accountability, transparency, and participation in governance among Libyans. As citizens become more engaged, they can influence the political direction by pushing for reforms and holding elected officials accountable. Social media is a powerful tool in this regard, enabling citizens to voice their opinions and mobilize.
Editor: That’s a vital insight. Lastly, if you could summarize what the election of Takala means for Libya in one sentence, what would it be?
Dr. Saeed: The election of Muhammad Takala signifies a potential turning point for Libya, offering a glimpse of hope for a unified approach to governance amid ongoing challenges, while also reminding us of the complexities that lie ahead.
Editor: Thank you, Dr. Saeed. Your expertise provides a lot of clarity regarding the implications of this recent election. We appreciate your insights and look forward to your future analyses.
Dr. Saeed: Thank you, it was my pleasure!
Editor: And thank you to our audience for tuning into Time.news. Stay updated for more in-depth discussions on global affairs.