The Chairman of the Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation Committee in the House of Representatives, Youssef Al-Aqouri, held an accountability session for the Minister of Foreign Affairs Plenipotentiary of the Libyan Government-designate (Hamad’s government), Abdul Hadi Al-Hawaij, regarding the Amadou Lamine Sano incident, within the framework of the parliamentary jurisdiction of the Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation Committee.
According to the information received by the Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation Committee, the aforementioned person impersonated the special advisor to the President of the Republic of Guinea-Bissau and organized a visit to Libya during which he met with high-level figures, where the Minister of Foreign Affairs gave his answer in which he clarified the circumstances of the allegations published in the media about “Amadou,” stressing that The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Libyan government is subjected to a media attack from suspicious parties.
For his part, Al-Aqouri thanked the Minister of Foreign Affairs for complying with the call for accountability addressed to him, explaining that this is considered a respect for the values of democracy and the role of the House of Representatives as an elected authority representing the Libyan people.
The Chairman of the Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation Committee also stressed the continuation of accountability to clarify the circumstances of the incident, noting the keenness of the Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation Committee to follow up on the accountability sessions for this issue given its impact on national security, state sovereignty, and Libya’s image abroad.
Last updated: November 24, 2024 – 16:23
Suggest a correction
Interview between Time.news Editor and Foreign Affairs Expert
Editor: Welcome to Time.news! Today, we’re delving into a recent event in Libyan politics that raises serious questions about diplomatic protocols and accountability. Joining us is Dr. Amina Barakat, a noted expert in international relations and Middle Eastern affairs. Thank you for being here, Dr. Barakat.
Dr. Barakat: Thank you for having me. It’s a pleasure to be here.
Editor: Let’s dive right in. The recent accountability session conducted by Youssef Al-Aqouri regarding Minister Abdul Hadi Al-Hawaij’s handling of the Amadou Lamine Sano incident has created quite a stir. Can you give us a brief overview of what happened?
Dr. Barakat: Absolutely. The session was called after Amadou Lamine Sano, who allegedly impersonated a special advisor to the President of Guinea-Bissau, was able to organize a visit to Libya and meet with high-ranking officials. This raised serious concerns about security protocols and verification processes in the diplomatic sphere.
Editor: It sounds alarming. What implications does this have for Libya’s foreign relations, especially with Guinea-Bissau?
Dr. Barakat: The incident could potentially strain relations between Libya and Guinea-Bissau. If Sano had malicious intent—possibly attempting to influence Libyan policies or misrepresent Guinea-Bissau—it could create distrust. Libya must implement stricter verification processes to avoid similar incidents in the future and to maintain its diplomatic credibility.
Editor: That makes sense. In your view, how competent was Minister Al-Hawaij in addressing the situation during the accountability session?
Dr. Barakat: From what I’ve gathered, Minister Al-Hawaij did clarify the circumstances surrounding the allegations. However, the very fact that such an incident could occur under his watch raises questions about the effectiveness of the protocols in place. It will be crucial for him to ensure that there are stringent measures to prevent impersonation and unauthorized diplomatic activities moving forward.
Editor: Given the complex political landscape in Libya, do you think this incident might trigger a broader discussion about accountability and governance within the government?
Dr. Barakat: I believe so. This incident amplifies the need for greater accountability mechanisms not just in the foreign affairs sector but across all governmental departments. It serves as a reminder that poorly maintained protocols can have wider ramifications, particularly in a country like Libya, which is still navigating post-conflict recovery and rebuilding trust with the international community.
Editor: That’s a crucial point. So, looking forward, what steps should the Libyan government take to safeguard itself against similar incidents?
Dr. Barakat: First and foremost, there should be a comprehensive review of current diplomatic practices and the vetting processes of visitors. Establishing robust systems for verifying the identities and credentials of foreign officials is essential. Additionally, fostering collaboration with other nations to share intelligence on potential threats could enhance Libya’s security measures.
Editor: All excellent suggestions. As we wrap up, Dr. Barakat, what do you think are the broader implications for international diplomacy when such a breach occurs?
Dr. Barakat: breaching established protocols can undermine the legitimacy of diplomatic engagements. It breeds uncertainty and can create caution among countries when engaging in international dialogues with nations that have reputations for lax security measures. The integrity of diplomatic channels is foundational for international relations; hence, this incident underscores the necessity for vigilance in diplomatic undertakings.
Editor: Thank you, Dr. Barakat. Your insights are enlightening, especially as we navigate these complex diplomatic waters. We appreciate your time and expertise.
Dr. Barakat: Thank you for having me. It was a pleasure discussing these important issues with you.