An inmate threatens to kill François Hollande and Manuel Valls: two years in prison

by time news

A⁢ prisoner was sentenced on Thursday​ by the TGI of Alençon to two years in prison for making death threats last year against ​former president ‍François Hollande and his ⁣prime minister Manuel Valls.

“It will ‌cost you at least the life ​of one of your children, Thomas,”⁢ the prisoner had said, through his ⁢wife, during a phone call to the Elysée.

“I’m going to look for Valls”

“I am not a clown, I will attack Valls, his family”,​ had ‌also threatened Mohamed Doumbia,‍ detained ‍at the ‍time of the events in the Condé-sur-Sarthe ⁤prison, near Alençon.

The case had been‍ examined by the ​anti-terrorism⁤ unit of the ‌Paris prosecutor’s office, which feared possible external complicity.

Supervisors were also threatened

Mohamed Doumbia had‌ also verbally ‌threatened the prison guards in‍ these⁣ terms: “I will have you shot with⁤ a Kalashnikov” ⁢and “I intend ⁣to‍ have your ⁤throat slit from one end​ to the other”. Security at the‍ homes ⁤of ‍threatened supervisors had been‌ tightened.

After‌ being⁢ transferred⁣ to another correctional⁤ center, the⁤ inmate refused to appear in court in June, only to be tried via⁢ video ‍in ‍September 2017. He was‌ tried⁤ in his absence⁣ on ‌Thursday. In addition to a further two years in prison, he was sentenced to pay 1,500 euros in⁣ damages ‍to a supervisor.

Time.news ‌Interview: Analyzing Threats Against ⁤Political Figures

Time.news Editor: Welcome,​ everyone. Today, we are discussing a pressing issue that‌ raises ⁣concerns about political safety and public discourse. I am joined by Dr. Emilie Duval, a political⁢ psychologist and expert on threats against public figures. Thank you for being here,⁣ Dr. Duval.

Dr. Emilie Duval: Thank you for having me. It’s a pleasure to discuss such ‌an‍ important topic.

Time.news Editor: Last week, a prisoner was sentenced to two years in ‍jail for⁢ making death threats against former‍ French President François Hollande and former ⁤Prime Minister Manuel Valls. What ⁣are your initial thoughts on this case?

Dr. Emilie‍ Duval:⁤ This⁤ case highlights a troubling trend‌ in political discourse, where threats escalate⁤ from verbal to physical. ⁤The comments made by the individual, particularly the‍ reference to‌ the potential harm to children,‍ are‍ not only aggressive⁤ but reveal a mindset that affects societal stability.‌ It’s alarming.

Time.news Editor: Indeed, the quote, “It will cost you⁣ at least the life of one of your children, Thomas,” is ⁢particularly ⁢chilling.‌ How‌ do threats‍ like⁤ these impact not just the individuals targeted, but‌ the⁤ political landscape as ⁣a whole?

Dr. Emilie Duval: Threats against political figures can create a climate of fear that inhibits open dialogue⁢ and debate. For the leaders‍ themselves, it can lead to increased ‌security measures,⁤ potentially⁤ alienating them⁢ from the public. On a broader scale, it can ⁢discourage people from ‍entering politics or being vocal about their opinions, ultimately stifling democracy.

Time.news ⁢Editor: What psychological factors might drive ⁤an individual to make such extreme threats?

Dr. Emilie Duval:⁤ Many factors can contribute, including feelings of powerlessness, ideological ‍extremism, and social isolation. In some cases, individuals might feel that their grievances are not being addressed ‍through peaceful means, leading them ⁣to resort to threats. It’s a disturbing ⁤expression of deep-seated frustrations.

Time.news Editor: How ‌do you think societies can address this rising trend of threats against public figures?

Dr. Emilie Duval: Education and ⁢open dialogues about political⁣ differences are key. Encouraging a culture where dissent‌ can be⁢ expressed without resorting to violence is vital. Additionally, public officials need to engage with communities more actively⁣ to foster understanding and trust.

Time.news Editor: What role ⁤do social ​media and the internet play in amplifying or mitigating these⁤ threats?

Dr. Emilie Duval: Social media can indeed amplify such threats, as it allows for rapid spread⁤ of extremist views and can​ create echo ‌chambers. However, it can also‌ be a tool⁣ for positive change, facilitating dialogue and activism against ‍hate. The challenge lies in moderating harmful content without infringing on​ free speech.

Time.news Editor: As someone engaged in this field, what can be done to provide support ⁢to political figures facing such threats?

Dr. Emilie Duval: Providing psychological support is crucial. Many political figures experience stress and anxiety from threats, so mental health resources and counseling can be invaluable. Additionally,⁤ implementing robust ⁢security measures‍ is necessary to ensure their safety while they carry out their important work.

Time.news Editor: Thank you, Dr. ⁢Duval, for sharing your insights with us today. It’s⁢ evident that​ the intersection of political safety and public discourse remains a critical issue in our society.

Dr. Emilie⁢ Duval: Thank you for having me. It’s vital that we ‍continue these conversations to foster a healthier political environment for everyone.

Time.news Editor: Absolutely. We hope our discussion today sheds light on this important topic and encourages action. Thank you to our viewers for tuning in. Until ​next time!

You may also like

Leave a Comment