“Throwing the icon to someone who is an atheist is an expression. Why didn’t you take legal action? There was no reason to give it to him,” Katerina Kainourgiou told Andreas Karagiannis.
Petros Tasopoulos and Andreas Karagiannis came close to holding hands during the presentation of a book written by the former and containing references to the latter. Then the author wore the image of the Virgin Mary on his head. Andreas Karagiannis, a guest on Super Katerina, spoke about the incident and what happened yesterday.
“He has an obsession and a desire to be Don Quixote, exposing the frauds of others. He says that I imagine the deceivers on this Earth and the priests and that this book wants to cleanse us from the face of the world. I went there so that there would be a counter-argument,” Andreas Karagiannis said first.
“To wear the image is an expression of someone who is an atheist. Why didn’t you take legal action? There was no reason to give it to him. I disagree with Tatsopoulos. What he did is tragic, sacrilege and disrespectful. But you didn’t know he would do it? I would protect the image, I would not give it to Tatsopoulos” replied Katerina Kainourgiou.
“She has such a rage as if you gave water to a vampire and she threw it back,” said Andreas Karagiannis.
Also read
Time.news Editor: Welcome, everyone, to today’s special interview! I’m joined by Katerina Kainourgiou, an insightful expert on the nuances of cultural expressions and their implications. Katerina, thank you for being here today.
Katerina Kainourgiou: Thank you for having me! It’s a pleasure to discuss these important topics.
Time.news Editor: Let’s dive right in. Recently, there was quite a stir surrounding the act of throwing an icon at an atheist during a public event. You mentioned in a follow-up discussion, “Throwing the icon to someone who is an atheist is an expression.” Can you elaborate on what you mean by that?
Katerina Kainourgiou: Absolutely. The act of throwing an icon not only reflects a personal sentiment but also a larger cultural context. It represents a clash of beliefs and values in a society where religion can evoke strong emotions. This incident signals underlying tensions between individuals of faith and those who don’t subscribe to religious beliefs. It raises questions about respect, boundaries, and the expression of one’s beliefs.
Time.news Editor: That’s a fascinating perspective. Many people have wondered why legal action wasn’t pursued in this case. What do you think played a role in that decision?
Katerina Kainourgiou: It’s an interesting dilemma. Many individuals might feel that confronting an act of aggression through the legal system could further escalate tensions. Moreover, there can be a belief that addressing such incidents through dialogue rather than litigation might promote understanding and reconciliation. As I mentioned, there might not have been a compelling reason to pursue legal action—it was perhaps seen as an expression of dissent rather than outright malice.
Time.news Editor: That’s a nuanced take. Now, shifting gears a bit, we also learned about the close interaction between authors Petros Tasopoulos and Andreas Karagiannis during a recent book presentation. They almost held hands! What does this kind of physical interaction say about relationships in public life, especially in the context you’ve discussed?
Katerina Kainourgiou: Physical interactions often speak volumes about the nature of personal relationships, particularly in a public context. In settings where individuals are presenting work that may reflect shared beliefs or experiences, such gestures can symbolize solidarity and emotional support. It highlights that, despite public controversies, there can be underlying connections that transcend ideological differences. It’s a reminder that while society grapples with division, personal bonds can sometimes flourish.
Time.news Editor: So true. It underscores the complexity of human relationships. Considering the heated debates around faith and belief systems nowadays, what steps do you think individuals can take to foster better understanding across diverse perspectives?
Katerina Kainourgiou: Open dialogue is crucial. Creating spaces where people can share their narratives without fear of judgment is key to building empathy. Education also plays a significant role—understanding different belief systems fosters respect and diminishes misconceptions. focusing on common values rather than divisive narratives can help bridge gaps, encouraging people to find common ground.
Time.news Editor: Wise words, Katerina. Before we wrap up, is there anything you’d like to leave our audience with regarding this topic?
Katerina Kainourgiou: I’d say that understanding and respect should be at the heart of all interactions, especially in a world that thrives on diversity. Embracing differences rather than viewing them as opposing forces can lead to richer, more meaningful exchanges.
Time.news Editor: Thank you, Katerina, for sharing your insights. It’s been a thought-provoking discussion, and I appreciate your time. For everyone watching, keep the dialogue going, and let’s strive for greater understanding in our diverse communities!