Prosecutor specializing in money laundering,Elizabeth Peralta,was seen last Monday before becoming a fugitive from justice due to a court order imposing 18 months of preventive detention for her alleged involvement in an influence plot drug trafficking and bribery,in which the TV presenter is also involved, Andres Hurtado.
The program Love and Fire from the TV station Willax He found the magistrate near his lawyer’s office, Benji Espinozabefore the settlement hearing began in which the the supreme judge Gustavo Álvarez He evaluated whether to apply the precautionary measure or allow the magistrate to continue the process freely.
The images show Peralta leaving her home before noon, dressed formally and talking to a driver before heading to her defendant’s office, in center of Lima. When questioned by a reporter, the prosecutor declared: “I’m not going to say anything,” and added: “I never denied that friendship,” referring to her relationship with Hurtado, who is being held in prison Lurigancho.
The cameras followed her until she entered the office on Contumazá street, at which point she covered her face with her purse. The hearing was held that day to break the tie The Supreme courtwhere there was a tie vote on his preventive detention. During the court session,the superior judge expressed concern regarding Peralta’s defense.
“She’s cited jurisprudence and doctrine, but then she doesn’t mention that she didn’t actually lie and she cites a series of cases that will be analyzed. The question is which argument is yours that I have left for the purposes of deciding: is your client’s behavior consistent with her adjusting her actions to the requirements of the competent authority, or is she exercising her right to remain silent or not tell . to defend the truth in line with its procedural position,” he said.
When he found out that the judges finally decided to sentence her client to pre-trial detention, Espinoza announced that she would surrender this evening, despite being “in disagreement”. However, he subsequently abandoned the initiative and his client went into hiding, although she has an arrest warrant against her.
The prosecutor is involved in this alleged corruption story along with the businessman Javier Miu Lei and the TV host. He is accused of offering influence to return gold seized from Miu Lei, in exchange for a million dollars, and of having received $80,000 to influence a money laundering inquiry against Paltarumi, the businessman’s competitor.
A third event involves her with Hurtado in the request for $100,000 from the family of iván Siucho, the faithful confessor of the case at the moment, to stop the investigation against Quantico Servicios Integrados. After learning of the situation, Siucho gave over $20,000, but when the amount was not completed, the investigation began. The Public Ministry has a proof of deposit for Hurtado’s company as evidence.
During a search of Peralta’s home, compromising elements were found, such as an airline ticket, bank account notes, and a suitcase with various items.manuscripts with instructions to destroy a digital backup were also found,raising suspicions of tampering with evidence. The Prosecutor’s Office reported that Peralta refused to hand over a cell phone, claiming it was his daughter’s, contradicting a previous statement in which he claimed to have lost it.
However, the judge continued her cooperation and dismissed the charges. “I think this should stop. They publish everything, which is not, which does not answer me, everything is an obstacle to justice, and a doctor, no, it is indeed not like that. I ask that an expert be made, a calligraphy expert be made so that I can see that it is indeed not my handwriting. What they find, they publish it on TV becuase the Public Ministry. At the time I will have to hide it, it is not my voice, it is not my handwriting,” he said while crying in a previous hearing.
How does preventive detention serve to protect the integrity of ongoing investigations in cases involving corruption?
Interview between Time.news Editor and Legal Expert Dr. Maria Delgado
Time.news Editor: Good morning, Dr. Delgado! Thank you for joining us today to discuss the recent developments in the ‘cibolín’ case. It’s a rather shocking situation involving Prosecutor Elizabeth Peralta. can you give us a brief overview of her alleged involvement?
Dr.Maria Delgado: Good morning! Yes, indeed, the ‘cibolín’ case is troubling. Prosecutor Elizabeth Peralta is facing serious allegations of participating in an influence plot that involves drug trafficking and bribery, which prominently includes TV presenter Andrés Hurtado.The court has ruled for her preventive detention for 18 months, indicating that the judiciary sees a important risk in allowing her to remain free during the ongoing investigation.
Editor: That’s a severe measure for a public official. What does preventive detention involve, and why is it frequently enough employed in cases like these?
dr. Delgado: Preventive detention is a legal process whereby an individual is kept in custody to prevent them from interfering with the investigation, fleeing, or committing further crimes. In cases involving corruption and organized crime, such as this one, the authorities consider it crucial to maintain judicial integrity and ensure that crucial evidence isn’t tampered with—especially as both Peralta and Hurtado are in positions where they could possibly influence ongoing proceedings.
Editor: I see. Now, regarding the circumstances around Peralta’s detention, ther have been reports that she became a fugitive shortly after the court order. Could you elaborate on the implications of that?
Dr. Delgado: Absolutely. The fact that she fled raises significant concerns about her willingness to cooperate with the legal process. It could also indicate that she believes there’s a strong case against her or that she may receive a harsher sentence if convicted. Fleeing from justice ofen complicates a case, as it can lead to further charges and more severe penalties.
Editor: Interesting perspective. In the public eye, especially when media cameras are following her, perceptions matter.How do you think the media’s role in cases like this influences outcomes?
Dr.Delgado: The media has a powerful impact on public opinion and can create lasting narratives about individuals involved in high-profile cases. This can put immense pressure on the judicial system,either by swaying public sentiment or provoking a reaction from the authorities to ensure that justice is served effectively. It’s a double-edged sword—while media attention can raise awareness about corruption, it can also lead to trial by public opinion.
Editor: You mentioned the significant relationship between Peralta and Hurtado. She stated, “I never denied that friendship.” how do personal relationships complicate judicial proceedings like this?
Dr. Delgado: Relationships between individuals involved in cases of corruption can cloud judgment and lead to conflicts of interest. If prosecutors and defendants have personal ties, it raises questions about their professionalism and integrity. This can damage the credibility of the judicial process, as the public may perceive that justice is not being served fairly.
Editor: Definitely a complex situation. What do you think are the next steps in this case?
Dr. Delgado: The immediate next step will likely involve the judicial authorities tracking Peralta down to enforce the court’s ruling. following that, there will be ongoing investigations into her alleged activities and possibly new charges filed against her. As for Andrés Hurtado, his connection to these allegations will also need to be addressed in court. This case is likely to evolve into a broader investigation into systemic corruption.
Editor: Thank you, Dr. Delgado! Your insights are invaluable as we navigate this troubling case. it will certainly be interesting to see how it unfolds in the coming months.
dr. Delgado: Thank you for having me! We’ll be keeping a close eye on this case as it progresses.