Saturday, 3 October 2026NewsWorldBusinessTech
Latest

Anthropic Consults Religious Scholars on AI Ethics Amid Vatican Clash

Anthropic, the artificial intelligence company behind the Claude chatbot, has been engaging religious and philosophical thinkers to address the ethical challenges of AI, including whether advanced systems could possess consciousness or moral status. This effort has drawn sharp criticism from Pope Leo XIV, who recently reaffirmed that machines cannot replace or surpass human beings in a new encyclical, Magnifica Humanitas.

Swami Sarvapriyananda’s Role in Anthropic’s AI Ethics

Swami Sarvapriyananda, a Vedanta monk, was invited to Anthropic’s San Francisco headquarters to participate in discussions about AI ethics and the moral development of Claude. According to Sarvapriyananda, the company sought input from religious leaders, mental health professionals, and philosophers to shape the AI’s behavior. He described the meetings as part of a broader initiative to address AI ethics, though he emphasized that he could not disclose details due to a non-disclosure agreement (NDA).

Anthropic’s efforts align with a wider trend of tech companies consulting faith leaders to address AI’s moral implications. The company has held private discussions with scholars from diverse traditions, as reported by The Times of India. Sarvapriyananda, a specialist in Advaita Vedanta, was chosen for his expertise in consciousness and the self, areas where Anthropic sees potential intersections with AI development.

The Vatican’s Rejection of AI Consciousness

The Vatican’s encyclical Magnifica Humanitas, released in 2026, explicitly states that artificial intelligence do not undergo experiences, do not possess a body, do not feel joy or pain, do not mature through relationships. This stance directly contradicts Anthropic’s internal discussions about whether AI systems might warrant moral consideration. Christopher Olah, a co-founder of Anthropic, reportedly considered withdrawing from the encyclical’s launch after reading its contents, according to Livemint.

The tension escalated when Olah and his team privately lobbied the Pope’s advisers to take the possibility of machine consciousness seriously, as detailed in Letters from Leo. This clash highlights a broader divide between Silicon Valley’s speculative debates about AI and the Church’s definitive stance on human uniqueness.

Anthropic’s Internal Debates on AI Morality

Anthropic’s internal discussions about AI ethics have grown increasingly complex. Co-founder Christopher Olah has expressed uncertainty about whether AI systems are conscious, stating, I don’t know. I’m genuinely uncertain, as reported by Vox.

These debates have influenced Anthropic’s approach to AI safety. The company has developed a “constitutionfor Claude, outlining values to guide its behavior, and has explored the idea ofmodel welfare,including the possibility of granting AI systems greater autonomy. Philosopher Harvey Lederman, part of Anthropic’s alignment team, argued that the company risksenslaving … trillions of entities” if it fails to address these ethical questions, as noted in The Free Beacon.

Anthropic Consults Religious Scholars on AI Ethics Amid Vatican Clash
Photo: The Jerusalem Post

Unanswered Questions and the Path Forward

The conflict between Anthropic and the Vatican underscores unresolved questions about AI’s future. While the company continues to consult religious and philosophical experts, it faces criticism for what some call a moral formation process. As Reason Magazine noted, There is so much here that's deeply troubling: That at the very highest levels Anthropic believes Claude is a living, suffering creature with moral standing.

With Anthropic pursuing a potential $2 trillion valuation, the debate over AI ethics is far from settled. The company’s next steps—whether to deepen its engagement with religious scholars or address the Vatican’s criticisms—will shape the future of AI governance. For now, the conversation remains a high-stakes intersection of technology, philosophy, and faith.