2024-06-14 15:08:01
A duplicitous enterprise operator manipulates search rankings… Coupang: “Not associated to this concern”
Coupang “High publicity, e-commerce platform practices…unprecedented measure”
Mobilize executives and workers to jot down opinions “Assessment proportion is barely 0.3%… no affect”
The Truthful Commerce Fee (FTC) imposed a wonderful of 140 billion gained on Coupang, saying it deliberately positioned its personal model (PB) merchandise and immediately bought merchandise on the high of search rankings and mobilized executives and workers to jot down buy opinions.
By way of the dimensions of the wonderful, it’s the highest ever imposed on a single home firm. In response to the imposition of this unprecedented wonderful, Coupang instantly issued rebuttal supplies and introduced an enchantment.
◆Subject 1. Is the twin standing of a web-based platform and product vendor an issue?
The Truthful Commerce Fee outlined this as a twin standing, contemplating Coupang to be a web-based procuring market operator that sells its personal merchandise and brokers product transactions, in addition to a platform that units and operates search rating calculation requirements and brokers product transactions.
The reason is {that a} enterprise with such a twin standing was sanctioned for exposing its personal merchandise first in search rankings over brokerage merchandise.
Nonetheless, Coupang countered that the problem on this case had nothing to do with twin standing. The place is that this concern is a matter of shopper misperception and doesn’t presuppose twin standing.
It is a discriminatory sanction towards Coupang in comparison with previous instances the place sanctions had been imposed solely contemplating shopper misperception.
◆Subject 2. Are grocery store ‘shows’ completely different from on-line ‘search’?
The Truthful Commerce Fee defined that offline shops, similar to giant retailers, normally promote solely their very own merchandise, so though the composition or ratio of merchandise bought might change via product show, it’s tough to draw prospects from competing companies.
In response, Coupang countered that there was no actual distinction between offline show and on-line search rankings, and that this was reverse discrimination in comparison with offline hypermarkets that promote PB merchandise within the ‘gold zone’, the place gross sales are greater than 4 instances increased.
It’s mentioned that different e-commerce platforms are additionally persevering with the follow of exposing PB merchandise on the high.
Quite a few e-commerce shops promoting PB merchandise, similar to Market Curly, Baedal Minjok, Sseok.com, and Lotte, clarify that whenever you enter key phrases similar to moist wipes, dumplings, bottled water, or eggs, PB merchandise are displayed on the high within the order of fundamental suggestions.
On the similar time, he raised his voice saying that this measure is an unprecedented measure on the planet for the order of product publicity by distributors.
◆Subject 3. Mobilize executives and workers to jot down opinions… Is that this publicity rating manipulation?
The Truthful Commerce Fee understands that Coupang has had 2,297 executives and workers write 72,614 buy opinions for 7,342 PB merchandise since February 2019, and gave them a mean star score of 4.8 (worker Vine).
It’s believed that Coupang initially tried to safe buy opinions via the ‘Coupang Expertise Group’ composed of normal shoppers in January 2019, however when it grew to become tough to gather buy opinions as a result of lack of expertise of Coupang’s PB merchandise, it applied worker Vine.
Nonetheless, Coupang refuted that the proportion of opinions from the expertise group out of all PB product opinions was solely 0.3%, and that there was no goal and scientific proof that product opinions influenced the order of publicity.
As well as, it’s mentioned that there have been many instances the place executives and workers gave low scores.
◆Subject 4. Is PB product regulation infringing on shoppers’ buy of low cost merchandise?
The Truthful Commerce Fee determined that Coupang’s ‘manipulation of the search rating algorithm’ and ‘utilizing executives and workers to jot down opinions and assign scores’, which had been confirmed via particular person case investigations, constituted an act of ‘attracting prospects by hierarchy’, which is prohibited by the Truthful Commerce Act. It was mentioned.
Subsequently, it isn’t true that customers’ alternative of PB merchandise is proscribed or has a destructive affect on costs.
Nonetheless, Coupang claimed that the distributor’s PB merchandise have served as an ‘inflation breakwater’ by offering high-quality merchandise at half worth regardless of repeated worth will increase by giant producers in an period of excessive inflation.
On the similar time, he defined that this PB regulation will make it tough for purchasers to search out or buy cost-effective direct buy merchandise, together with PB merchandise, and that there’s a danger that it will ultimately act as a catalyst for worth will increase.
[서울=뉴시스]
2024-06-14 15:08:01