Article 158(2): Suit for removal of governor … is the office wrong?
ThMishra Governor RN Ravi is embroiled in a fresh controversy under Article 158 (2) of the Constitution of India. Due to the case in the Madras High Court in this regard, the question has arisen whether Ravi’s appointment as governor is wrong.
Mutal clash since taking office…
Tamil Nadu Governor R.N. Ever since Ravi took office, the conflict between the ruling DMK government and him has been increasing day by day.
There has been severe criticism that Governor Ravi has not yet given assent to several bills that have been passed in the assembly and sent for approval.
In particular, the Ordinance issued on October 1 to ban online gambling expired on October 27. Governor R. N. Ravi raised various questions regarding this bill to the Tamil Nadu government. Wrote a letter. Within the next 24 hours, the Tamil Nadu government also sent an explanatory letter to it. But as the Governor did not approve the bill, the old status quo continues again.
Dismissal suit
In this situation, Governor RN Ravi’s appointment as the Chairman of the Auroville Foundation in Puduwai is unconstitutional, and a case has been filed in the Madras High Court demanding his removal from office, creating a sensation in the political circles of Tamil Nadu.
In this regard, Kanchipuram District, Father Periyar Dravida Kazhagam Secretary Kannadasan has filed a petition in this regard.
* “From the day RN Ravi took office as the Governor of Tamil Nadu, he has been a problem person.
* Participated in public events and spoke about Sanatana Dharma and against Dravidian movement principles.
* He is working against the interest of the public by keeping the files pending for months without any reason for the files sent by the Tamil Nadu Government.
* Further, Tamil Nadu Governor R.N. Ravi, in Puduvai As Chairman of Arrowville Foundation by the Central Government for a period of four years Appointed.
* The appointment has been made through notification dated October 6, 2021.
* Under the Auroville Foundation Act, 1988, it is stated that the post of President carries a salary and pension.
‘Contrary to Article 158(2) -‘
Under Article-158 (2) of the Constitution of India The Governor should not be responsible for any profit-making enterprise It is mentioned that In spite of that, he is the leader.
* By this he is acting against the Constitution of India.
* As this is contrary to the oath taken by him on his assumption of office as Governor, he is not eligible to hold office as Governor.
* So he should be sacked.”
On behalf of the petitioner, Madras High Court Senior Advocate Duraisamy has filed this petition and has taken over the case, it is said that this petition may come up for hearing tomorrow.
50+ bills pending!
In this situation, from 2018 to 2022, 67 bills have been sent by the Tamil Nadu government for the approval of the President and the Governor. Out of which 54 bills have been shelved.
In this How many bills were sent in the AIADMK regime, how many bills were sent in the regime led by Chief Minister Stalin, Click here to read detailed information including what retired High Court Judge Krupakaran has to say about this…