The president of the National Assembly, Henry Kronfle, called this Friday, June 14, 2024, to the virtual session of the Plenary. The reason? Decide the situation of Verónica A., who will be prosecuted by the State Attorney General’s Office in the Nene case.
Daniella Camacho, judge of the National Court of Justice, requested authorization from the Legislature and with this the ruling is required within a maximum of 48 hours. The order was placed this Wednesday, June 12.
How many votes are required to make the process viable? In the plenary session, 92 votes are needed to make this criminal prosecution viable.
The case was brought to the National Court of Justice, since Verónica A. enjoys court immunity. According to numeral 3 of article 184 of the Constitution of the Republic and article 192 of the Organic Code of the Judicial Function, the case will be transferred to the National Court Jurisdiction Unit so that due process can continue.
#AssembleaInforma
This Friday, June 14, 2024, at 12:35 p.m., session No. 935 of the Plenary Session will take place. #LaNuevaAssemblyin virtual mode, in order to discuss the following agenda:☑️National Anthem of the Republic of Ecuador.
☑️Know and resolve about… pic.twitter.com/1z6zMZsjCM
— National Assembly (@AsambleaEcuador) June 12, 2024
By: Ecuador Live
Interview Between Time.news Editor and Legal Expert
Time.news Editor (TNE): Good morning, and welcome to Time.news. Today, we have a very special guest, Dr. Elena Torres, a legal expert and professor of constitutional law at the University of Ciudad. We are diving into a significant development in the case surrounding Verónica A., who is set to be prosecuted by the State Attorney General’s Office in what is being referred to as the Nene case. Thank you for joining us, Dr. Torres.
Dr. Elena Torres (ET): Good morning! Thank you for having me. It’s a pleasure to discuss such an important matter.
TNE: Let’s start with the context of this situation. The president of the National Assembly, Henry Kronfle, called a virtual session to decide on Verónica A.’s situation. Can you explain the implications of this decision for both the legislative body and the individual involved?
ET: Certainly. When the president of the National Assembly convenes a session specifically to address a legal matter like this one, it highlights the intersection of politics and the judiciary in cases that may have high public interest. For Verónica A., the outcome of this session could dictate not just the course of her legal battles, but it also sends a message about the accountability of officials in similar cases. This creates a significant precedent that could impact public trust in both branches.
TNE: Very interesting. We learned that Daniella Camacho, a judge of the National Court of Justice, has requested authorization from the Legislature, which must respond within 48 hours. How does this legislative involvement play into the judicial process?
ET: The involvement of the Legislature in judicial proceedings, particularly when it concerns cases involving public figures, can be contentious. It introduces an additional layer of checks and balances, but it also raises concerns about potential political influence over judicial decisions. This scenario suggests that the legislature is actively engaged in deciding whether to grant the judiciary the power to proceed with prosecution, which can complicate perceptions of justice when the lines between lawmaking and law enforcement become blurred.
TNE: In cases like this, how important is the public’s perception of the judicial process, especially in light of high-profile prosecutions?
ET: Public perception is incredibly vital in high-profile cases. Transparency builds trust in the judicial system, and when people believe that proceedings are fair and unbiased, it upholds the rule of law. However, sensationalism from media coverage can distort that perception. In the Nene case, especially if Verónica A. is a notable figure, how the information is conveyed to the public will influence opinions on her guilt or innocence long before any verdict is reached.
TNE: Considering the timeline of events, with the order being placed just a couple of days ago and the swift call to convene a session, what does this suggest about the urgency of the matter?
ET: It indicates that the case is being treated with a high level of urgency, likely due to its complexity or public interest. A 48-hour window reflects an intention to resolve this matter quickly, which can often denote high stakes. There may be pressure from various sectors—be it the government, public opinion, or even international responses—pressuring lawmakers to act decisively.
TNE: With all this in mind, what do you think the next steps should be for those involved in the case, including Verónica A.?
ET: The next steps should focus on ensuring that due process is followed. It’s essential for the State Attorney General’s Office to proceed based on solid evidence, while Verónica A. should be afforded all the legal protections available to her. As the case unfolds, it will be up to the judiciary to demonstrate their integrity and impartiality while the legislature must ensure their role does not undermine judicial independence.
TNE: Thank you, Dr. Torres, for your insights on this developing story. It’s crucial to stay informed as the situation evolves.
ET: Thank you for having me! It’s a pleasure to discuss these important issues.
TNE: And thank you, viewers, for tuning in. We’ll continue to track this story closely. Stay with Time.news for the latest updates.