The Libyan delegation to the League of Arab States called on the permanent delegates to the League to an emergency meeting to discuss the Israeli aggression against Syria.
According to what the delegation published on its official facebook account, the meeting is expected to be held within the next two days, and urgent measures will be taken regarding the Israeli encroachment into Syrian territory, according to its expression.
The occupying state announced on its army radio that its military incursion into southern Syria reached about 25 kilometers to the southwest of the capital, Damascus.
as the fall of Assad, the Israeli occupation state has launched dozens of raids on military sites under the pretext of destroying Syrian strategic weapons that might pose a threat to it.
In its raids, the occupying state targeted a number of military sites in the city of Daraa in southern Syria, including the headquarters of the 132nd Brigade, in addition to targeting the scientific research center in Barzeh in Damascus.
The Israeli raids also targeted major air bases in Syria, destroying infrastructure and dozens of helicopters and fighter jets, as well as the Syrian army’s air defense battalion in the Maaloula area in the Damascus countryside.
The Israeli incursion into Syrian territory is a violation of the disengagement agreement between Syria and the Israeli occupation in 1974, but Israel justifies its movements with security necessities.
The buffer zone between Syria and the occupying state remained for nearly 50 years subject to the agreement to separate the forces that fought in October 1973.
Source: Libyan delegation + Reuters
What are the ancient reasons behind Israel’s military actions in Syria?
Title: The Implications of Recent Israeli Actions in Syria: an Interview with Middle East Expert Dr. Hana Majid
Published by Time.news
Q: Thank you for joining us today, Dr. Majid. The recent activities involving Israel’s military incursion into southern Syria have raised many concerns. Could you summarize the background of these developments?
A: Certainly. The Libyan delegation to the League of Arab States has called for an emergency meeting to address what they have termed “Israeli aggression against Syria.” This situation escalated recently with Israel’s military asserting that they have penetrated approximately 25 kilometers into southern Syria, close to the capital, Damascus. The backdrop here is Israel’s long history of conducting air raids within Syria, notably targeting military sites and perceived threats since the fall of Assad. The justification for these actions,according to Israel,rests on security needs,despite being considered violations of the disengagement agreement established in 1974.
Q: What specific military targets has Israel engaged recently, and what are the implications of these raids?
A: Israel’s recent airstrikes have included notable military installations in the city of Daraa and a scientific research center located in Barzeh, Damascus. Furthermore, the raids have severely damaged major air bases and destroyed military infrastructure, including helicopters and jets, which are critical to Syria’s defense capabilities. The implications of these actions are profound; they not only undermine Syria’s military strength but also contribute to regional instability, igniting tensions among neighboring countries and the broader Arab world as evidenced by the Libyan delegation’s urgency in asking for a meeting.
Q: The League of Arab States convening in response to this situation signals a regional concern. What are the potential outcomes of this emergency meeting?
A: This emergency meeting may lead to a variety of outcomes, including a unified Arab stance against Israel’s military aggressions and potential economic or political actions against Israel. The Arab League has historically supported member states facing external threats, and should a consensus be reached, it could reshape the dynamics in the region and bolster solidarity among Arab nations. The meeting may also reiterate calls for international intervention or mediation to prevent further incursions.
Q: Given the complexities involved,what practical advice would you offer to readers following this situation?
A: For individuals interested in this geopolitical situation,I recommend staying informed through reliable news sources and engaging in discussions concerning Middle Eastern politics. It’s crucial to understand the broader context of the Syrian conflict and Israel’s historical claims in the region. Additionally, supporting organizations committed to peaceful resolutions and humanitarian aid can be beneficial in addressing the consequences of unrest in conflict zones.
Q: what do you foresee as the future trajectory of Israeli-Syrian relations amid these recent developments?
A: While it’s arduous to predict the exact trajectory, current trends suggest that unless there is a significant shift in diplomatic engagements or an easing of hostilities, we may see continued military confrontations and heightened tensions. The longevity of the disengagement agreement seems increasingly precarious, and without proactive measures from the international community, the risk of escalation remains high. Dialogues aimed at peace are vital, as are efforts to address the humanitarian needs of the affected populations caught in this turmoil.
As global attention turns toward Syria and its interactions with Israel, the need for informed discourse and proactive engagement becomes ever more vital for peace in the region.