ATACMS: What does the release of Biden’s missiles bring to Ukraine?

by time news

US ⁤President Joe Biden allowed Kiev ⁣to attack targets in Russia with​ ATACMS missiles.‍ But the weapon has a short range and has lost much of its former effectiveness.

Outgoing US President Joe Biden has given Ukraine⁣ permission to attack targets ⁢”deep inside” Russia using US-supplied weapons. It is essentially ‌a single system, the ATACMS (Army Tactical Missile System), a⁤ ballistic and tactical missile. Biden has not yet made medium-range cruise missiles available to Kiev.

ATACMS has a‍ narrow military definition. That’s at least 300 kilometers, depending on the types the US delivered ​to Ukraine. However, the range is significantly ⁢lower than that of drones produced by Kiev itself. These are based on small planes and have already reached destinations more than 1,000 kilometers away.

Britain had previously given Ukraine permission to use the Storm ⁣Shadow cruise missile against targets in Russia. Germany has not yet delivered any⁢ “Taurus” cruise missiles.

Unlike Taurus, ‍Tomahawk or Storm​ Shadow, an ATACMS does not require ‍a jet to operate. It is launched from special ground⁢ launch​ vehicles. Therefore there is no need to put valuable ⁢aircraft at risk. The Ukrainians hide these vehicles: they can only be discovered directly in action. Depending on the series, the ATACMS can hit targets at a maximum distance of between 160 and approximately 300 kilometers. Since launchers are⁢ rarely placed directly on the‌ boundary, you need to subtract your safety distance.​ So they cannot reach all of Russian territory, but they ⁣can reach the⁤ command centers and logistics centers of Russian troops in the Kursk region. ‌Russia has announced that it ​views these operations as an escalation and believes that American soldiers are directly involved. For example, in target reconnaissance, planning and weapons control. Given that Ukraine does not have its own reconnaissance capabilities in Russian territory, this is not entirely unreasonable.

‌ May 31, 2023, 7.49pm

War in Ukraine

MGM-140 ATACMS – the US Army’s tactical missile


Russian counterpart

Regardless of the political dimensions, the ‌question arises as to what effects ATACMS attacks will have. First of all, the weapon is not unique. The Russians have the more powerful Iskander 9K720. Depending on the type, the ballistic missile‍ has a range of more than 500 kilometers. ‍It is used in ‍large numbers against Ukraine. ⁤At best, the Ukrainians will be able to catch up if they receive adequate quantities.

Like all weapons of this type, the ATACMS has only one warhead, the⁤ long-range one has a payload of only about 200 ⁤kilograms, less than ‍half that of an⁤ Iskander. It can be equipped with a‌ cluster warhead ‌or one for bunkered⁤ targets. Such a rocket is not suitable for ⁤large-scale destruction. It must precisely attack very valuable targets, ideally those that cause fires or secondary explosions that increase the effect of the missile itself. Or valuable targets being destroyed by cluster munitions. These would be ammunition ⁢and fuel depots or helicopters and jets, as long as they are not protected by shelters.

The ATACMS cannot be expected to have a similar effect to that of Russian glide⁤ bombs, which weigh up to 3,000 kilograms. However, a large area within Russia is becoming⁣ vulnerable. There, the Russian⁤ military must prepare against attacks by avoiding storing ‌vehicles in the open, camping over large areas or building protective bunkers for their aircraft. In any case, you will have to invest more efforts.

Interference with⁤ precision weapons

At the moment it is impossible‌ to ‌say how precisely the​ weapons hit. So far, the ‌Russians have succeeded relatively quickly in electronically destroying the West’s ​precision weapons. The use⁣ of Excalibur grenades, Storm Shadows Himars launchers and even the ‍ATACMS‌ quickly lost much of its effectiveness. The ⁢ATACMS are currently in Ukraine and could be used against targets in Crimea or the Russian-occupied part of Ukraine even ⁣before‍ Biden’s decision. In theory, they could have been used to destroy​ the logistics of the Russian offensive in ⁢Donbass. It didn’t happen. Many experts suspect that these missiles will now be used against North Korean ⁤troops in the​ Kursk region.

November‍ 18, 2024, 1.56pm

ATACMS: What does the release of Biden’s missiles bring to Ukraine?

Analyze

Despite their small payload and ⁤limited number⁤ of missiles, it is possible that the ATACMS will initially be successful ⁣again. With proper controls, they can outwit Russian‍ disruptive measures⁣ for a while. Their ‌limited ​range led⁤ the Russians to move their planes deeper into the ⁢country. In any case, ATACMS ‌are just the beginning. Kiev would need a constant supply of these weapons and systems with a much longer⁣ range. To achieve an effect on the battlefield, Kiev does not benefit from individual successes, but only from the long-term successful and systematic use of these weapons.

Many things stand in the way of this. If the Russians succeed in essentially ‍repelling the missiles, it‌ would be a major embarrassment not only for Kiev, ⁤but also for the United States. The second problem is the limited life span of American government.⁢ Joe Biden, literally in the last meters of his presidency, has come to a decision he has been putting‌ off for years. Donald Trump Jr. has already written on social⁣ media: “The military-industrial complex seems to want to ensure that⁢ World War III ⁢breaks out before my father has a chance to create peace and save lives.” It is certainly questionable whether his father, Donald Trump, will let his predecessor dictate the direction of‌ his Ukraine policy.

What is‌ the significance of ‌the ATACMS ⁢missile system in the current⁣ conflict between Ukraine and ⁣Russia? ⁤

__headline-wrapper”>

Military Analysis

⁤ ‍ ⁤ US Missiles Against Russia: Biden Provokes Trump and Scholz

the ATACMS ​missile system offers Ukraine the capability⁢ to‍ engage high-value Russian targets without exposing aircraft to direct risk.⁢ While ‍it has limitations compared to Russia’s sophisticated weaponry like the Iskander, it can​ still impact ⁤Russian military operations by targeting logistic centers and command posts in specific regions. The strategic context of these missile strikes raises tensions, ​and both nations are adjusting their military tactics in response to ‌the evolving battlefield dynamics. The overall effectiveness of the ATACMS in ‍the conflict remains to be fully assessed, especially given ⁣the historical challenges faced by Western precision weapons against Russian electronic countermeasures.

You may also like

Leave a Comment