Aura Kasih’s Legal Team Denies Affair Allegations, Prioritizes Child Custody Case
Table of Contents
Aura Kasih’s legal representatives have firmly denied recent reports alleging an affair between her and Ridwan Kamil, emphasizing that the singer’s sole focus remains on securing a favorable outcome in her ongoing child custody proceedings. The legal team has declined to engage with the unsubstantiated rumors, prioritizing the well-being of the children involved.
Dismissing Affair Claims as Untrue
On Tuesday, December 23, 2025, in Kuningan, South Jakarta, Yanti Nurdin, a lawyer representing Aura Kasih, stated unequivocally, “From Mba Aura’s comments, all of that is not true, she only focuses on child custody. So the news is not true.” This statement directly addresses the circulating claims and underscores the client’s commitment to the legal process.
Focusing Solely on Child Guardianship
Another attorney for Aura Kasih, Alexander Januar Gaodilliam, echoed this sentiment, explaining the team’s deliberate strategy of limiting public comment. “Sorry because we are only focusing on child guardianship, so regarding the gossip out there we won’t comment much at first. We will only focus on child guardianship until it is determined,” Gaodilliam said. This approach aims to shield the children from the intense public scrutiny surrounding the allegations.
No Plans to Pursue Legal Action Against Rumor Spreaders
When questioned about the possibility of reporting individuals spreading the false news, the legal team indicated that such action is not currently under consideration. “So far, there has been no report whether or not we want to report it because we are only focused on child custody. So there is still a long way to go there and there has been no discussion in that direction,” explained Gaodilliam. “Now we focus on the child, which is the priority rather than the rumors.”
Maintaining Discretion to Avoid Speculation
The legal team also expressed caution regarding public statements, recognizing the potential for misinterpretation and further speculation. “We don’t know yet and we can’t comment much. It’s still conjecture and uncertain, so we won’t comment much for fear of causing speculation. We can only discuss guardianship,” Gaodilliam concluded, reinforcing the team’s commitment to a measured and focused approach.
The team’s unwavering dedication to the child custody case signals a clear intention to navigate the legal proceedings with discretion and prioritize the best interests of the children involved.
