Canberra – Australian consumers could soon witness significant changes to how sunscreen is tested and labelled, following a recent scandal that revealed widespread inaccuracies in SPF ratings. The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), the country’s regulatory body for medicines, is proposing an overhaul of testing requirements, accreditation for laboratories, and transparency measures, aiming to restore public trust in the products designed to protect against Australia’s intense sun. This comes after a report last year highlighted that many popular sunscreens were not delivering the level of protection advertised on their packaging, raising serious concerns about public health.
Australia has one of the highest rates of skin cancer in the world. According to the Cancer Council Australia, around 2,000 people die from skin cancer and melanoma annually, and an estimated two out of three Australians will be diagnosed with a skin cancer in their lifetime. Given these stark statistics, the reliability of sunscreen is paramount. Currently, sunscreens are categorized as medicines in Australia, but are monitored *after* they are on the market, rather than undergoing pre-market assessment by regulators. This post-market monitoring system is now under scrutiny.
The Fallout from Inaccurate SPF Claims
The push for change was largely triggered by a report released in June 2023 by Choice, an independent consumer advocacy group. The report found that 16 out of 20 sunscreens tested failed to meet their advertised SPF ratings. Some discrepancies were significant. One product, manufactured by Ultra Violette, claimed an SPF of 50+, but independent testing revealed an SPF of just four, prompting a voluntary recall. The TGA subsequently launched its own investigation, which raised “significant concerns” about the SPF testing of nearly two dozen products sharing the same base formula as Ultra Violette’s Lean Screen, suggesting they may likewise not provide the protection stated on their labels.
“Proposals to improve and expand testing requirements, require accreditation for testing laboratories, and increase transparency will help restore consumer trust in the reliability of SPF claims,” said Andy Kelly from Choice. “It’s vital that consumers can rely on SPF claims when purchasing products to protect their skin from the harsh Australian sun.” While Choice welcomes the proposed overhaul, the group has expressed reservations about one specific element: the potential removal of SPF number ratings.
A Shift in Labelling: Numbers vs. Categories
The TGA is considering replacing the current SPF numerical rating system – where products are labelled with numbers like SPF 30, SPF 50, or SPF 50+ – with a simpler categorization system: low, medium, high, and very high protection. The rationale behind this shift is to address concerns about the inherent variability in sunscreen testing and the potential for the numerical system to create a false sense of security. Experts like cosmetic chemist Michelle Wong have noted that SPF testing can sometimes feel more like a marketing exercise than a true reflection of efficacy, and that the current system doesn’t adequately account for real-world application and individual factors.
However, Kelly argues that removing the numbers would be counterproductive. “People are already familiar with the current SPF numbering system and it’s used around the world. The numbers just need to be accurate,” he stated. This debate highlights a broader challenge: how to communicate complex scientific information to the public in a way that is both understandable and trustworthy.
What the Overhaul Will Focus On
The proposed changes will concentrate on several key areas. First, the TGA aims to improve the reliability and transparency of SPF testing itself. This includes stricter protocols for laboratories and a greater emphasis on quality control. Second, the agency will scrutinize the quality and efficacy of ingredients and formulas, particularly those found in “cosmetic sunscreens” – products that often prioritize aesthetics and feel over pure sun protection. These types of sunscreens have come under increased scrutiny in recent years.
The overhaul will *not* include a review of the safety of sunscreen ingredients, nor will it address products specifically designed for children. This narrower focus reflects the TGA’s prioritization of addressing the immediate concerns about SPF accuracy and labelling. The agency has stated that it already has robust regulations in place regarding ingredient safety, and that children’s sunscreens fall under a separate regulatory framework.
Despite Australia already having some of the strictest sunscreen regulations globally, the TGA believes an overhaul is necessary to maintain public confidence. The agency acknowledges that the recent findings have shaken consumer trust and that proactive measures are needed to prevent similar issues from arising in the future. According to the TGA’s official announcement, the proposed changes are currently under public consultation, with a deadline for submissions set for March 15, 2024.
While 95% of the sunscreens tested by Choice were found to provide enough SPF to significantly reduce the risk of skin cancer, the incident underscores the importance of vigilance. Consumers are advised to continue using sunscreen diligently, alongside other sun-safe practices like seeking shade, wearing protective clothing, and avoiding peak sun hours.
The next step in this process is the TGA’s review of the public submissions received during the consultation period. A final decision on the proposed changes is expected in the coming months, with implementation likely to follow in late 2024 or early 2025. Consumers can stay informed about the progress of the overhaul by visiting the TGA website.
Have your say: What are your thoughts on the proposed changes to Australian sunscreen regulations? Share your comments below.
