Alberto Gonzalez Amador, The partner of the president of the Community of Madrid, Isabel Díaz Ayuso, has announced her intention to present a complaint for insults adn slander against the socialist spokesperson in the Madrid City Council, Reyes Marotoif he dose not retract the statements in which he defined him as a “self-confessed fraudster”. For this reason he is asking for compensation of 20 thousand euros.
González Amador’s lawyers presented a request for conciliation between the parties, which constitutes the step prior to the filing of the complaint. Likewise, it demands 20,000 euros from the former minister for his statements in relation to the case opened at the Supreme court against the State Attorney General, Álvaro García Ortiz, for an alleged crime of revealing secrets in relation to the case opened against the first for fraud.
Maroto said “there’s a lot of noise” related to this and that lawsuit “the conclusion” is that “the only one who is currently a self-confessed fraudster” is “Mrs Ayuso’s partner”.
Alberto González Amador sued the first vice president and minister of finance before the supreme Court, Maria Jesus Monterofor illegitimate interference with his right to honor, and asks for 40,000 euros for this, due to statements in which he stated that the president of Madrid could “live in an apartment paid for by fraud”.
He did so after Montero was not present at the conciliation ceremony held in a Madrid court on October 2 following the lawsuit he filed. The partner of the Madrid president thus continues the judicial offensive launched against several ministers for declarations relating to the agreement that his defense offered to the Prosecutor’s Office to recognize two tax crimes and thus avoid trial.
Ayuso accuses of “state operation” against her
The President of the Community of Madrid, Isabel Diaz ayusohe went to the ‘Espejo Público’ program on Antena 3 to talk about current affairs. Ayuso accuses several high government officials and assures that it was Pedro Sánchez who put it into operation against her “all the powers of the State”..
For example, “to the State Attorney General, whose prosecutor – Álvaro García Ortiz – is accused, to the State attorney… Is there a right for this to happen? at the same time all the ministers insulted, defamed and then the cabinet of the President of the Government…”, says the President of the Region at the beginning of the interview.
“Lobato arrives, uses it against me, accuses me corruption“When my government has no corruption, this has nothing to do with the Community of Madrid”, he assures. “My partner has nothing to do with my working life,” insists Ayuso. “Juan Lobato used it, he did it for many months… and he was asking me to resign and when he saw that he was getting into trouble and that what he was doing was fraudulent, that’s when he went to a notary ,” Ayuso adds regarding the leak about Ayuso’s boyfriend.
Follow us on our whatsapp channel and don’t miss the latest news and all the latest news from antenna3noticias.com
how does the fallout from political discourse in Madrid impact voter perceptions and election outcomes?
Interview: The Fallout of political Discourse in Madrid
Interviewer (time.news Editor): Good day, and thank you for joining us. Today, we have a distinguished guest, a political analyst and expert in Spanish politics, dr. Javier Morales. welcome, Dr. Morales!
Dr. Javier Morales: Thank you for having me. It’s a pleasure to be here and discuss such an significant issue.
Editor: Recently, we saw some heated exchanges among local politicians in Madrid, particularly involving Alberto Gonzalez Amador and Reyes Maroto. Can you give us a brief overview of the situation?
Dr. Morales: Absolutely. alberto Gonzalez Amador, who is closely associated with the president of the Community of Madrid, Isabel Díaz Ayuso, has announced that he intends to file a complaint for insults and slander against Reyes Maroto, the socialist spokesperson in the Madrid City Council. This stems from Maroto labeling him a “self-confessed fraudster.” This incident highlights the increasingly charged rhetoric in political discourse today.
Editor: It’s certainly been a dramatic few days. what do you think drives these kinds of allegations and the urgency of legal action in political settings?
Dr. Morales: There are multiple layers to this situation. Firstly, we’re seeing a trend of heightened tensions between diffrent political factions in Spain. With statements like Maroto’s,the aim can often be to undermine credibility and sway public opinion. On the other hand, legal threats like those from Gonzalez Amador suggest that politicians are prepared to safeguard their reputations fiercely—especially in an environment where public perception is paramount.
Editor: You mention public perception. How much do you think incidents like this influence voters?
Dr. Morales: Great question. Such incidents can polarize voters even further. Campaigns often thrive on narratives of character and integrity. if a politician is labeled a fraudster, it can severely damage their reputation, leading to a tangible loss of support. However, the immediacy of a legal complaint can also rally their supporters, painting them as victims of political attacks, thus garnering sympathy.
Editor: So,what might the implications of this conflict be for Madrid’s political landscape in the long term?
Dr. Morales: The long-term implications are quite significant. Escalating conflicts such as this can result in a more combative political atmosphere, which may alienate moderate voters and lead to a cycle of retaliatory rhetoric. If political discourse shifts overwhelmingly towards personal attacks, it can detract from addressing pressing local issues. Moreover, parties might find themselves compelled to adopt more extreme positions to stand out, further polarizing the discussion.
Editor: Looking ahead, how can politicians better navigate these contentious discussions while still holding each other accountable?
Dr. Morales: It’s a delicate balance. Politicians could benefit from focusing on policy and shared goals rather than personal attacks. Establishing clear standards for discourse within parties might also help. Open dialogues where opposing views are respected and discussed could foster a healthier political environment. Ultimately, the responsibility lies with both politicians and the electorate to demand better.
Editor: Thank you, Dr. Morales,for your insights into this evolving situation in Madrid. It will be captivating to see how this complaint unfolds and what it means for the future of political conversation in Spain.
Dr. Morales: Thank you for having me. I look forward to seeing how these developments play out.
Editor: And thank you to our readers for tuning in. Keep an eye on our coverage for all the latest updates on this ongoing story.