Ben Hodges: Russia had every advantage in the war, but only one left

by times news cr

Despite these advantages, Russia has so far ⁣captured less than a quarter ⁣of Ukraine’s territory, while suffering ‍more than 600,000 casualties, he said.

“The Russian Navy is‍ no longer even a significant factor​ in‌ the war. The Russian Air ​Force,​ on the other hand, has failed in its two most ‍important ⁤tasks – ​gaining air superiority and cutting off supply‍ routes‌ from Poland to Ukraine. ‌Failure after failure. They finally took⁣ Avdiyivka in February, but‍ now in October‍ , they still haven’t taken Pokrovsk, which is only‌ 60 kilometers away,” ⁤the‌ retired lieutenant general told LETA during the “Riga Conference” security and foreign policy forum.

Hodges emphasized that defeating the masses is possible with precision that allows⁢ for strikes ⁢on command posts, logistics and artillery.

“If you destroy these objects, then the⁤ numerical advantage becomes insignificant, ⁢because the⁣ masses need leadership, they ‍need transport to deliver the ⁣ammunition, and also ⁢artillery, because⁤ they bomb and bomb⁤ and then send the ‘meat’. Therefore, weapons are ‌needed that able⁤ to deliver precision strikes at long range. They are able to ‌break Russia’s ability to attack,”‍ Hodges⁣ said.

He believes that the wave-like‌ ruptures ⁣of the Donbas front line will continue, however, ‍he pointed out that the Russians are moving forward very slowly and “thousands of people⁤ are being killed for⁣ small​ towns like Vukhledar ‌or Bakhmut, which are located in the⁣ very east of Ukraine, and which are quite ⁤difficult to call strategically ‌important “.

“As long as the Russians can keep up‌ massive ‍bombardment followed by massive ‌attacks, they will have gradual ​success. However, I⁤ don’t ​see any ​way ‌they ‌will‌ be able⁣ to break through the front line and, for example, attack all the‍ way ‍to‍ the ⁤Dnipro,”‌ Hodges said.

Hodges is convinced that ⁢Russia is currently ⁢facing ⁤serious⁤ problems, as ‌evidenced⁢ by the involvement⁣ of North Korean soldiers. He believes that ‌it is still too early ​to judge​ the military ⁢significance of this ​step, ‍because ⁢it is not yet clear⁤ how many forces will be involved – perhaps tens of‌ thousands more are waiting to be sent to Ukraine.

“But it should be noted that these soldiers do not⁢ have any‌ combat ‍experience, they ​are not experienced veterans of any other war. I have no​ idea about⁤ the agreement that has ‌been concluded⁤ between Putin and [Ziemeļkorejas līderi] Kim Jong-un, but I​ think ⁤they will perform more of a “cannon fodder” function, thus ⁣saving ⁢the‌ lives ​of Russian soldiers. However, if there are⁢ thousands of them, this will⁢ cause a problem. Because it⁣ will add more bodies to the Russian approach⁤ to warfare,” Hodges said.

The⁣ involvement of ⁢the North Koreans, he says, demonstrates that Russian dictator ​Vladimir Putin is afraid of his own⁤ people.

“He certainly does⁣ not want to mobilize young men in Moscow and St.‌ Petersburg, because that would inevitably​ lead to​ funeral processions in ‌the streets⁤ of those ‍cities, which would cause him ​political problems,” ‌Hodges said.

The US lieutenant general also assessed the ‌Ukrainian invasion of Russian⁣ territory as an ‌important operation, ⁤as it changed the​ way⁣ the​ war was portrayed for a while – as opposed to the narrative that ‍Russia’s victory was inevitable and that they could not be‍ defeated, because three ⁣months after the start ⁤of the ‍operation, Ukrainian ‍forces were still on Russian territory ⁤.

Asked about the meaning of the term “Victory of⁤ Ukraine”, ⁢the ⁣former commander of the US forces in‌ Europe⁤ emphasized that it ‌does not depend ‍only on the President of Ukraine Volodymyr ⁣Zelensky or someone else, because “we are also ‍not like spectators in ⁣a football ‍match – we all have a part in the victory of Ukraine over Russia”. ⁤He pointed out⁤ that both the USA, Great Britain, Germany, our Baltic allies and ‍many others are interested in how this war will⁤ end, ⁤what will be the victory​ of Ukraine.

Hodges explained that Ukraine’s victory will consist of several ⁣elements.

First of all, it‍ is the full restoration of Ukraine’s ⁣sovereignty over its territory within the ‍1991 borders, including Crimea. Second, holding Russia accountable for war crimes committed. Third, the ‍thousands‌ of Ukrainian children who⁤ were ​abducted ⁣and scattered throughout Russia ⁤must be returned home. The fourth element is ⁢Ukraine’s NATO ⁣member status, as there are no other security guarantees, he said.

The fifth element, on the other hand, is‌ the⁢ reconstruction plan‍ for Ukraine – reconstruction of infrastructure and residential buildings, opening of​ sea ports​ and‌ all⁤ other necessary⁢ things,⁣ which will require hundreds of billions of euros, explained the general.

He expressed‌ his pleasant surprise that the “victory plan” presented⁤ by ⁣Zelensky did not only talk about‍ military ⁢affairs, but also about economy and diplomacy.

“Also, he wisely talks about ‍the differences between the invitation to join NATO and the admission‍ itself, because ⁤the invitation does not mean admission – ​it can happen only​ a year, two or even several years later. You remember how ​long Sweden⁢ had to wait ⁣for admission.⁣ Distinguishing‍ these two statuses, the prospect ⁤of an official invitation being extended to Ukraine — not just the oft-repeated ‘we believe you’ll be accepted one day’ ​– would send a clear signal,” Hodges said.

Title: An In-Depth Perspective on ⁣the Ukraine-Russia Conflict: An Interview with Retired Lieutenant General Hodges

Interviewer (Time.news Editor): ⁣ Good afternoon, General Hodges. Thank you for joining us today. Your insights into the ⁣ongoing conflict between Ukraine ⁤and Russia are invaluable. ​To⁤ start, could you highlight⁣ the current⁤ status of the conflict from your perspective?

General Hodges: ​Good afternoon! Of course. As of now, despite Russia’s initial ‌advantages, they ⁣have only managed​ to capture less than a‍ quarter of Ukraine’s territory. They’ve faced ⁣staggering⁣ losses, with more‍ than 600,000 casualties reported. This underscores the⁣ challenges they are facing on ⁢the battlefield.

Interviewer: ​That’s an‍ astonishing figure. You mentioned in a ​recent forum that both the Russian Navy and Air Force have failed in critical areas. Could you elaborate on that?

General Hodges: Absolutely.‌ The Russian Navy has diminished into ⁢a non-factor in this⁣ conflict, and their Air Force has⁣ not met‍ its ‌fundamental objectives. ‍They were supposed⁤ to ⁢achieve air superiority and disrupt⁤ supply routes ‍from Poland to⁢ Ukraine, but⁣ they failed on both accounts. Despite capturing Avdiyivka in February, they ‌still haven’t taken Pokrovsk—only 60 kilometers away—by October. It ⁣speaks volumes about their operational effectiveness.

Interviewer: What do you think ‌is the key to overcoming the numerical advantage that‍ Russia⁤ possesses?

General Hodges: The key lies in precision strikes. If we focus⁤ on destroying command posts, logistics hubs, and artillery, the numerical advantage ​of ⁣the​ Russian ⁣forces‍ becomes ‌inconsequential. Masses ⁢of troops require leadership, transport, and artillery. Effective long-range ⁤weapons can disrupt Russia’s ability to sustain its assaults.

Interviewer: You also mentioned⁤ that the current wave-like ruptures of the Donbas front line are expected ⁤to ⁣continue. What does that signify ⁤for the conflict moving forward?

General ​Hodges: It ⁣indicates that while Russia may​ achieve localized advances ⁣through sheer bombardment, the cost in human life is staggering. They ‌are sacrificing ⁢thousands for towns like Vukhledar and Bakhmut, which don’t hold significant strategic value in the grand scheme. I don’t foresee any breakthrough that allows them to advance⁢ towards major targets like Dnipro.

Interviewer: Fascinating. There ⁣have been reports about the involvement of North Korean soldiers on‍ the Russian side. What are your thoughts on this development?

General Hodges: ⁤ Ah, the enlistment ​of North Korean soldiers is quite telling. It demonstrates Russia’s desperation. However, we must remember that⁢ these troops ⁣lack combat experience. They could end up as “cannon fodder,”⁣ serving primarily⁢ to save ⁤the lives ​of​ seasoned Russian soldiers. If they do deploy⁤ tens of thousands,‌ it ⁤may create complications, but their effectiveness is still ​a big question mark.

Interviewer: What does this say about ‍President Putin’s concerns regarding domestic ⁣support?

General Hodges: Clearly, he​ is apprehensive. ⁣He ‌does not ‍wish to mobilize young men from major cities like Moscow and St.‍ Petersburg, as that would result ⁢in ⁤funeral ⁤processions that would ⁣spark⁣ political unrest. This move shows he’s aware of the ⁤potential backlash from his own populace.

Interviewer: Shifting to the Ukrainian ‍side, how do ‌you⁢ view⁣ their recent⁢ operations in Russian territory?

General Hodges: The Ukrainian operations on Russian territory have been significant.‌ They demonstrate that the narrative of an inevitable Russian victory is flawed. Just⁣ three months into ‍the ​conflict, we saw that Ukrainian forces‌ were still actively engaging on Russian soil. ‍It shifted perceptions ‍about the conflict significantly.

Interviewer: Lastly, what does “Victory ‌for ⁢Ukraine” entail ‌beyond ⁢just military objectives?

General Hodges: ‍It transcends the actions of President Zelensky ⁤or ⁤any single figure. Victory for Ukraine is a collective effort—much like a ⁣team sport.‌ Nations like the USA, UK, Germany, and ‌our Baltic allies all play a role.‌ Each country’s support⁢ for Ukraine is crucial​ in ⁤achieving that victory.

Interviewer: Thank you for these enlightening insights, General⁣ Hodges. It’s crucial to understand the multifaceted dynamics⁣ of this conflict. We appreciate your time.

General Hodges: Thank you for​ having me. It’s vital we⁢ continue discussing and analyzing these developments to understand the future ​of the region better.

You may also like

Leave a Comment