The prosecution is being wielded as a bludgeon. Shortly after we enacted the Law on the Judiciary, effectively saying goodbye to Saranof, who clearly doesn’t command the majority in parliament, we see this move regarding parliamentary immunity.This is what Ivaylo Mirchev of ”PP-DB” stated in an interview on bTV.
Earlier, acting Chief Prosecutor Borislav Saranof requested immunity for Kiril Petkov due to the arrest of Boyko Borissov, Vladislav Goranov, and Sevdalina Arnaudova in 2022.
“Borislav Saranof isn’t acting alone. The changes to the Judiciary Law will inevitably lead to him no longer being Chief Prosecutor. Before him, there was Tsatsarov, than Geshev. This pattern has been repeated. There is absolutely no chance that anyone will be coerced into submission through these immunity requests. If they demand immunity from all of us, we’ll offer it gladly,” Mirchev stated definitively.
“Borislav Saranof frequently meets with Delen Peeveski. Today, there was a meeting between them. Could this request for immunity emerge shortly after their meeting? This following the “Eight Dwarfs” case, it’s the ninth time this pattern repeats itself,” the MP noted.
Will there be a government?
Mirchev clarified that “Democratic Bulgaria” seeks a regular government but won’t back down from the declaration of a sanitary cordon against Delen peeveski.
“We have differences in approach with ‘Continuing the Change’. According to PP, Borisov needs to sign the declaration. According to us, it should be included in an agreement. What matters is not someone signing the declaration but concretizing these measures with specific deadlines – the Judiciary Law by this date, Eurozone membership by that date,” commented the representative of “Democratic Bulgaria”.
What are the key challenges facing the Bulgarian judiciary amid recent reforms?
Interview with Ivaylo Mirchev: Navigating the Complexities of Bulgaria’s Judiciary Changes adn Political Landscape
Editor: Welcome, Ivaylo Mirchev, MP for “Democratic Bulgaria” and a key voice in the ongoing discussions about the judiciary reforms in Bulgaria. Let’s dive into the recent developments.
Q: Ivaylo, it seems there are notable shifts happening within the judiciary, especially with Chief Prosecutor Borislav Saranof’s recent request for parliamentary immunity. What are the implications of this move?
A: The request for immunity is not occurring in a vacuum. It follows our recent enactment of the Law on the Judiciary, effectively ushering in a new phase for the office of Chief Prosecutor, which I believe Saranof will no longer command. His actions suggest an attempt to wield the prosecution as a bludgeon against those who pose a political challenge, notably regarding the arrests made in 2022.
Q: You mentioned that Saranof isn’t acting alone.Can you elaborate on this dynamic?
A: Absolutely. There’s a discernible pattern in our judiciary with previous Chief Prosecutors,like Tsatsarov and Geshev,employing similar tactics when facing political pressure. This history suggests that Saranof’s strategy is a continuation of that trend. We have to be clear: no one will be coerced into submission through these immunity requests. If they demand immunity from all of us, we would gladly offer it. This unwavering stance ensures accountability and transparency.
Q: you also highlighted a concerning relationship between Saranof and Delen peevski.How significant is this interaction?
A: Saranof and Peevski meeting frequently, especially before such a significant request for immunity, raises serious questions about the motives behind these decisions. This is particularly alarming in light of the “Eight Dwarfs” case, which highlights a recurring theme of political maneuvering within our judiciary system. We must scrutinize these connections closely to understand the broader implications for Bulgaria’s democratic integrity.
Q: Given these challenges, what is the current stance of “Democratic Bulgaria” concerning forming a government?
A: “Democratic Bulgaria” remains committed to forming a regular government but emphasizes that we will not back down from establishing a sanitary cordon against Delen Peevski. The approach we advocate for focuses on concrete measures rather than signing mere declarations. We expect that any agreement must include specific, actionable deadlines related to judiciary reforms and commitments such as eurozone membership.
Q: what practical advice can you share with our readers who may feel uncertain about the political future in Bulgaria?
A: it’s essential for citizens to remain informed and engaged. The political landscape is dynamic, and understanding the implications of these judicial changes is crucial.I encourage everyone to advocate for transparency and accountability in governance. Participating in discussions, voicing concerns, and holding politicians accountable will strengthen our democracy. We should strive for a system that prioritizes justice and the rule of law above all else.
Editor: Thank you,Ivaylo Mirchev,for your insights on such a pertinent issue. Your perspectives help illuminate the complexities of Bulgaria’s political landscape.