The capital Congress urged the Attorney General’s Office (FGR) and too Federal Judiciary Council (CJF) to investigate the possible commission of crimes of judges, magistrates and ministers who were absent from their jobs within the framework of the approval of the judicial reform.
In ordinary session,legislators agreed that the stoppage of activities in the Judicial Branch affected thousands of people,who were deprived of access to prompt and expeditious justice.
You might be interested in: Chamber of Deputies receives Labor Law for apps
The judicial reform led to a stoppage of activities by workers of the Judicial Branch, who were absent from their work in the District Courts and Circuit Courts for 70 days, which violated the article 216 of the Federal Penal Codestated the deputy of the Green Party (PVEM) Victor varela.
“This article perfectly frames possible crimes incurred by judges and other workers of the Judicial Branch of the Federation when they declare themselves unemployed, and also excludes the crime of coalition when they abandon their positions or call unionized workers who leave to not respect a law. on strike, in this one,” he asserted.
You might be interested in: The SCJN invalidates budgetary provisions of Morelos and Oaxaca
By expressing his support for the proposal, the Morena legislator, Fernando Zarate indicated that crimes committed with the objective of boycotting constitutional reforms must be punished, and it must be ensured that there is a Current rule of law.
MSA
Related
What are the key elements of the recent judicial reform in Mexico that have raised concerns among legal experts?
Interview with Legal Expert on Judicial Reform Impact in Mexico
Interviewer (Time.news Editor): Thank you for joining us today to discuss the recent judicial reform in Mexico and its implications. At the recent legislative session, there was a call by Congress to investigate judges and magistrates who were absent during the judicial reform approval process. What do you think prompted this investigation?
Expert: Thank you for having me. The urgent call for investigations by the Attorney General’s Office (FGR) and the Federal Judiciary Council (CJF) stems from the significant disruption caused by the judicial reform. Thousands of individuals were deprived of their right to prompt and fair justice due to the stoppage of activities by workers in the Judicial Branch, which lasted for 70 days. This situation not only violated the principles of access to justice but also raised serious legal questions about the responsibilities of judges and magistrates under Article 216 of the Federal Penal code.
Interviewer: Article 216 was specifically mentioned by Deputy Victor Varela as framing the potential crimes of these judges. Can you elaborate on that?
Expert: Certainly. Article 216 addresses the legal ramifications of judicial workers declaring themselves unemployed or absconding from their posts. Varela pointed out that when judges and other Judicial Branch employees abandon their positions, especially in a way that disrupts judicial processes, they potentially violate this law. The implications hear are significant—it’s about accountability and the rule of law.If these individuals are found to have unlawfully disrupted justice, it sets a dangerous precedent for the Judicial Branch’s integrity.
Interviewer: The stoppage’s impact on ordinary citizens is profound. How does this scenario affect public trust in the judicial system?
Expert: The trust deficit is one of the most concerning repercussions of this stoppage. When citizens see judicial processes being obstructed and their rights compromised, it undermines confidence in an institution that is meant to uphold justice. Legislators like Fernando Zarate have indicated the need for accountability and the enforcement of law when reforms are boycotted. Without clear repercussions for such actions, the public may feel increasingly disenfranchised, diminishing their faith in the judiciary’s commitment to serve and protect their rights.
interviewer: From a practical standpoint, what can be done to remedy the situation and restore confidence in the judicial system?
Expert: Restoring confidence will require a multifaceted approach. Frist and foremost, any investigations into judicial misconduct need to be thorough, clear, and timely. Legislators must uphold their obligation to ensure a functional judiciary, emphasizing that laws apply equally to all, including judges. Furthermore, there needs to be open interaction about reforms and their objectives to the public, fostering a shared understanding of justice’s essential role in society. implementing checks and balances within the judicial system can help prevent future disruptions and promote accountability.
Interviewer: Thank you for your insights. As we continue to monitor developments in this area, what advice would you give to citizens who may find themselves affected by these judicial delays?
Expert: My primary advice to citizens is to stay informed and engaged. Understand your rights within the judicial system and advocate for timely justice. If faced with delays, it can be beneficial to seek legal counsel or assistance from legal advocacy groups that can help navigate the situation. Moreover, participating in discussions about reform and holding lawmakers accountable through civic engagement can create a broader push for necessary change within the judicial system.
Interviewer: Thank you for your valuable insights today.as this situation evolves, it’s crucial for citizens to remain engaged and informed.
Expert: Thank you for the opportunity to discuss this vital topic. The future of the judiciary and the implications for the rule of law depend on active citizenry and accountability from our legal institutions.