2024-06-22 07:21:58
Key officers Jong-seop Lee, Seong-geun Lim, and Beom-cheol Shin refused to take the oath resulting from the opportunity of indictment.
Jeong Cheong-chae, Chairman of the Judiciary Committee, “There’s an obligation to report below the Nationwide Meeting Enhance and Lower Act… Take motion after reviewing the authorized ideas.”
Jeon Hyun-hee and Jang Gyeong-tae “declared that they may lie” Kim Yong-min “It’s to keep away from punishment for perjury”
On the legislative listening to on the ‘Particular Prosecutor Chae Sang-byeong Act’ held on the Nationwide Meeting on the twenty first, former Minister of Nationwide Protection Lee Jong-seop, a key witness, refused to take the witness oath, inflicting a warfare of nerves with opposition occasion members even earlier than questioning started.
On today, the Laws and Judiciary Committee of the Nationwide Meeting held a legislative listening to to find out the reality in regards to the loss of life of a corporal within the line of obligation and suspicions of exterior strain on the investigation, with solely opposition occasion members, together with the Democratic Occasion of Korea, in attendance.
A complete of 12 witnesses have been requested by the Judiciary Committee to seem, and amongst them, Minister of Nationwide Protection Shin Received-sik was unable to attend resulting from an abroad enterprise journey, and Vice Minister Kim Seon-ho appeared on his behalf. Marine Corps Commander Kim Gye-hwan didn’t attend as a result of safety state of affairs.
Key officers within the case, former Minister Lee, former Marine Corps 1st Division Commander Lim Seong-geun, and former Vice Minister of Nationwide Protection Shin Beom-cheol attended the listening to however refused to take the oath as witnesses.
They cited Article 3 of the Act on Testimony, Appraisal, and so on. (Nationwide Meeting Enhance/Lower Act) and Article 148 of the Prison Process Act, arguing that it’s a proper assured by regulation.
Article 148 of the Prison Process Act states that an individual could refuse to testify if she or he is topic to legal prosecution or indictment or if there’s concern about guilt.
Former Minister Lee mentioned, “The witness is at present a defendant below the Corruption Investigation Workplace’s legal guidelines. He mentioned, “The topic of investigation below the particular prosecutor’s invoice additionally consists of the contents of the accusation,” and added, “I consider that below the regulation, I’ve the precise to refuse to take oaths and testify as witnesses.”
He continued, “Concerning the accusation case at present being investigated, there stays a chance of being indicted resulting from incorrect details and logical judgments of investigative businesses, together with the particular prosecutor, and there’s even a proper to refuse testimony,” including, “I’m satisfied that this case can by no means turn into a legal difficulty.” “I can be proactive and truthful in my testimony to resolve public suspicion,” he mentioned.
Consequently, an argument broke out between Democratic lawmakers and witnesses who refused to take the oath. Opposition occasion members fired again, asking, “Is that this a declaration that you’re going to lie?”
Representatives Jeon Hyun-hee and Jang Gyeong-tae, amongst others, mentioned, “We categorical remorse for the three witnesses who didn’t take the oath,” and criticized them, saying, “Those that didn’t take the oath are like first declaring that I’ll lie at a historic website in entrance of the general public.” did.
Rep. Kim Yong-min additionally raised his voice, saying, “The conduct of not refusing to testify however refusing to take the oath just isn’t simple to tolerate within the crucial state of affairs of a legislative listening to as an establishment representing the folks.”
Rep. Kim mentioned, “You need to testify reasonably than refuse to take an oath, but when there’s content material within the testimony that falls below Article 148 of the Prison Process Act, it’s acceptable to refuse to testify at the moment.” “It’s a very inappropriate angle to reject it,” he criticized.
He then mentioned, “Article 12 of the Nationwide Meeting Enhance and Lower Act has a clause that permits the committee to report and punish such instances in such instances,” and requested, “Please decide to file prices in opposition to the three witnesses for refusing to take the oath.”
Jeong Cheong-rae, chairman of the Judiciary Committee of the Democratic Occasion, mentioned, “Based on the provisions of Article 148, Paragraphs 1 and a pair of of the Prison Process Act, if I don’t make an announcement, it has the impact of not directly admitting that I’ve dedicated against the law.” He additionally added, “There’s additionally a provision within the Prison Process Act that permits refusal to testify.” He refuted Article 149, saying, “If I’ve obtained one other particular person’s secret, resembling a lawyer, physician, dentist, midwife, or actual property agent, in the midst of my job, it’s acknowledged that disclosure of it should trigger hurt to that particular person.”
On the identical time, he predicted that he would file a grievance, saying, “If a witness refuses to take an oath or testify with out justifiable purpose, or undermines the authority of the Nationwide Meeting or provides perjury whereas testifying, she or he has the duty to file a grievance in accordance with the Nationwide Meeting Testimony Appraisal Act.”
Chairman Jeong introduced, “If the committee determines that the said purpose for refusal just isn’t justifiable, we’ll file a grievance for the crime of refusing to take the oath as a witness,” and added, “Please put together to right away file a grievance within the afternoon after the morning assembly by means of a overview of authorized ideas.”
Not like former Minister Lee and others, Justice Minister Park Sung-jae didn’t refuse to take the oath as a witness. Minister Park mentioned, “I too was capable of refuse to take an oath and (testify) as a topic of investigation by the Particular Prosecutor Act as a result of some civic teams and members of the Nationwide Meeting filed a grievance,” however added, “I feel that the provisions associated to the Prison Justice Act may be topic to varied interpretations. “So long as I take an oath and testify, I’ll inform you the reality about what I can say,” he added.
[서울=뉴시스]
2024-06-22 07:21:58