China is integrating tourism into its broader soft power strategy to shift international perceptions through direct personal experience. By expanding visa-free access and upgrading digital infrastructure, Beijing aims to counter political narratives and drive economic growth, with the travel sector projected to contribute nearly US$4 trillion annually to its GDP.
For decades, China’s approach to global influence relied on a domestic propaganda template exported abroad. However, a strategic shift has occurred, moving from state-led messaging toward a model that emphasizes attraction and authentic interaction. This evolution reflects a realization that economic and military strength alone are insufficient for global leadership; image and the ability to attract others are equally critical.
The Shift from Public Diplomacy to Soft Power
The pursuit of soft power gained significant momentum around 2007, when then-President Hu Jintao linked the rejuvenation of the Chinese nation to the deployment of soft power. According to chinapower.csis.org, this marked a turning point where the government began treating soft power as a priority, leading to increased investments in broadcasting and the transformation of CCTV and Xinhua into global media outlets.
There is a distinct difference between the public diplomacy China has practiced and true soft power. While public diplomacy involves government-managed messaging, soft power is derived from society and policies that others find legitimate or attractive. One significant source of this attraction has been China’s economic performance, specifically its record of lifting hundreds of millions of people out of poverty.
Despite these efforts, the results have been inconsistent. Data cited by chinapower.csis.org indicates that China’s favorability ratings dropped fully 20% from 2009 to 2015. While the development model
remains attractive in parts of Southeast Asia, Africa, and Latin America, it faces significant friction in China’s own neighborhood, particularly with Japan, India, Vietnam, and the Philippines.
Tourism as a Strategic Diplomatic Asset
Beijing is now positioning tourism as a primary vehicle for soft power because it facilitates face-to-face engagement that transcends political differences. As reported by eTurbonews, the strategy focuses on creating authentic interactions where visitors engage directly with local communities, cuisine, and innovation.
This people-to-people diplomacy
is designed to replace international headlines with personal experience. By streamlining entry procedures and expanding visa-free policies, China is encouraging foreign visitors to witness its modern airports, high-speed rail networks, and digital infrastructure in cities like Shenzhen, Shanghai, and Beijing.
The goal is a subtle shift in perspective: a traveler visiting the Great Wall or a technology conference in Shenzhen returns home with a nuanced understanding of the country that government-funded broadcasting cannot achieve alone.
Economic Projections and Infrastructure Gains
The integration of tourism into national strategy is as much about the balance sheet as it is about diplomacy. Tourism is now a pillar of economic diversification, stimulating growth in rural regions and supporting small and medium-sized enterprises.
| Metric | Projected Impact/Value |
|---|---|
| Contribution to National Economy | ¥13.7 trillion |
| Annual Contribution to GDP | Nearly US$4 trillion |
| Jobs Supported | More than 83 million |
These figures, based on projections from the World Travel & Tourism Council (WTTC) as cited by eTurbonews, suggest that tourism will grow faster than many traditional industries over the next decade. This economic engine supports a transition toward higher-value activity and provides employment for younger workers.
The Friction of Cultural Export
While tourism and economic success build attraction, other cultural exports have struggled to translate into global influence. The disparity is evident in the entertainment sector. For instance, the movie Monster Hunt was a massive domestic hit in 2015, grossing $381 million in China. However, chinapower.csis.org notes that when it opened in the U.S. in January 2016, it earned only $21,000 in its debut weekend and closed after a week.
Similarly, the Confucius Institutes—designed to promote Chinese language and culture—have become flashpoints of controversy in European and American academia. Critics question whether these institutes serve as “Trojan horses” for propaganda or if they conflict with the values of freedom of thought and inquiry.
This contrast suggests that China’s most effective soft power does not come from curated cultural products or state-managed institutes, but from the tangible reality of its urban development and economic scale. The central tension remains whether these personal experiences can outweigh the declining favorability ratings and geopolitical frictions that continue to define China’s relationships with its neighbors.
Keep reading
