The first trial was held today at the Tokyo District Court.
“There was no grudge against Yasukuni Shrine.”
A Chinese man who was put on trial in Japan last May on charges of graffitiing the Yasukuni Shrine in Chiyoda-ku, tokyo, claimed that it was a protest against the discharge of contaminated water from the Fukushima nuclear power plant.
Jiji News reported that at the first trial held at the Tokyo District Court on the 29th, Chinese national defendant Mr. jang (29) stated the reason why he graffitied ‘Toilet’ in English on the stone pillar of Yasukuni Shrine.
Mr. Jang, who was indicted on charges of destruction of property and disrespect for places of worship, acknowledged the charges, saying they were “clear.”
japanese prosecutors pointed out that Mr. Jang, who lives in Saitama Prefecture, contacted two wanted Chinese men through social media and met them in person two days before the incident.
The prosecution claimed that Mr. Jang was in charge of preparing the tools needed for graffiti,including purchasing spray at a general store in Tokyo the next day.
During interrogation,Mr. jang explained that the motive for the crime was a protest against the discharge of contaminated water from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear Power Plant into the ocean. However, he said, “I had no grudges against Yasukuni Shrine.”
According to the indictment, Mr. Jang is accused of conspiring with other Chinese people to damage the stone pillar of Yasukuni Shrine on may 31 by writing ’Toilet’ in large red spray paint. The damage was estimated at 4.62 million yen (approximately 42.9 million won), and Japanese prosecutors indicted him for what he believed to be blasphemous acts against Yasukuni Shrine.
[서울=뉴시스]
-
- great
- 0dog
-
- I’m sad
- 0dog
-
- I’m angry
- 0dog
Hot news now
- great
- 0dog
-
- I’m angry
- 0dog
How might Mr. Jang’s case influence public sentiment towards Japan’s environmental policies and historical interpretation in China?
Time.news Interview: Understanding the Yasukuni Shrine Graffiti Case
Editor (E): Welcome to Time.news. Today, we’re diving into the complexities surrounding the recent trial of a Chinese national, Mr. Jang, who has been charged with graffitiing the Yasukuni Shrine in Tokyo. Joining us is Dr. Akira Fujimoto, a leading expert in Japanese political culture and international relations. Thank you for being here,Dr. Fujimoto.
Dr. Fujimoto (F): Thank you for having me. It’s a pleasure to discuss such an important issue.
E: To start, could you explain the meaning of the Yasukuni Shrine in Japan? Why does it evoke such strong sentiments, both domestically and internationally?
F: Absolutely. Yasukuni Shrine is a Shinto shrine that memorializes Japan’s war dead,including those who fought in World War II. It’s a site of deep national pride for many japanese,but it also serves as a flashpoint for controversy,particularly because it honors individuals viewed as war criminals. Hence, visits by political figures can provoke strong reactions from neighboring countries, especially China and Korea, which suffered greatly during Japan’s wartime expansion.
E: that context is crucial. In light of this, what does Mr. Jang’s graffiti incident reveal about the current tensions between Japan and China?
F: Mr. Jang’s actions appear to be a direct protest against Japan’s handling of recent environmental issues, particularly the discharge of contaminated water from the Fukushima nuclear plant. This event illustrates how historical grievances can be intertwined with contemporary political conflicts. Many Chinese feel that Japan’s past actions, combined with current environmental policies, warrant strong protest actions, even if they manifest in ways that may seem extreme or illegal.
E: During the trial, Mr. Jang acknowledged that his graffiti was a protest. Do you think this acknowledgment affects how the court might view his actions?
F: It certainly adds a layer of complexity. By admitting the charges but framing them within a context of protest, Mr. Jang is not only accepting obligation for his actions but also attempting to shift the narrative from vandalism to political expression. However, in legal terms, this may not be sufficient to mitigate the severity of his actions in the eyes of Japanese law, which takes vandalism and disrespect toward sacred sites very seriously.
E: the prosecution has indicated that Mr.Jang contacted others via social media before committing the act. What implications does this have for the legal proceedings and broader public perception?
F: This suggests a level of premeditation, which the prosecution may argue undermines any claims of spontaneous protest. It also raises questions about the institution of protests against Japan’s policies, whether they’re spontaneous grassroots movements or coordinated efforts. Public perception might vary; some may see him as a misguided individual acting out of desperation, while others could view him as a deliberate provocateur. It underscores the complexities of national identity and activism in the digital age.
E: Reflecting on Mr. Jang’s case, what do you think it indicates about the future of Japan-China relations?
F: Incidents like this can exacerbate tensions, especially if they are seen as emblematic of broader cultural misunderstandings.However, they can also lead to more important dialog about these issues, pushing both governments to address underlying grievances. Ultimately, it is critical for both nations to find ways to engage in constructive conversations about history, national identity, and environmental issues to prevent such tensions from escalating further.
E: Thank you, Dr. Fujimoto,for your insights on such a nuanced topic. It’s clear that Mr. Jang’s case is not just about one incident but reflects broader issues in Japan-China relations that could shape the future.
F: Thank you for having me. It was a pleasure to discuss this intricate situation.
E: And thank you to our audience for tuning in. Stay with Time.news for continuous updates on this developing story and more insights into global news.