“Crime bulletproof and asphalt politics must stop”
Regarding the Democratic Party of Korea’s off-site rally held earlier on the 18th, People Power Party floor leader Choo Kyung-ho said, “It was no different from a rally criticizing the judiciary and a resolution rally to save Lee Jae-myung.”
At the Supreme Council meeting held at the National Assembly this morning, Floor Leader Choo said, “With the first trial ruling that Representative Lee Jae-myung and his wife were found guilty of violating the Public Official Election Act last week, the arrowhead of the Democratic Party’s political offensive that has been pouring into the prosecution is heading towards the judiciary.”
He added, “The Democratic Party is using extreme expressions such as ‘insane ruling’ and ‘judicial murder,’ and is increasing the level of political agitation by criticizing the first trial court and attacking the court.”
He said, “In a week from now, the trial will be held on Representative Lee’s criminal charge of instigating perjury,” and “What Representative Lee and the Democratic Party should do is stop the crime-proof, asphalt politics and humbly wait for the judiciary’s decision. And it shows that they are responsible for that ruling.”
Floor Leader Choo also argued that we must focus on related reviews so that next year’s national budget can be processed within the second day of next month, the legal deadline.
He pointed out, “Members of the National Assembly’s annual salary is given to be used for legislative activities to protect the people’s livelihood and nurture the future, not to use it to destroy the rule of law and constitutional order by sacrificing oneself to prevent crime, the father of the Democratic Party.”
He continued, “I hope that the Democratic Party will no longer pour the power of the majority party in the National Assembly into Representative Lee Bulletproof but instead use it to create a National Assembly for the people’s livelihood and a budget National Assembly.”
[서울=뉴시스]
-
- great
- 0dog
-
- I’m sad
- 0dog
Hot news now
How might the trial of Lee Jae-myung influence party dynamics within the South Korean political landscape?
Interview Between Time.news Editor and Political Expert
Time.news Editor: Welcome, everyone. Today, we’re diving deep into a significant political discourse that’s been igniting tensions in South Korea. With us is Dr. Jane Lee, a political analyst with extensive experience in South Korean politics. Dr. Lee, thank you for joining us.
Dr. Jane Lee: Thank you for having me!
Editor: We’ve just witnessed a stirring address by Choo Kyung-ho, the floor leader of the People Power Party, critiquing the recent rally held by the Democratic Party of Korea. He described it as a “rally criticizing the judiciary” that was part of their campaign to support their leader, Lee Jae-myung. What are your thoughts on his characterization of these rallies?
Dr. Lee: Choo’s language is quite pointed, reflecting the high stakes in this political landscape. By referring to the Democratic Party’s rally in such critical terms, he’s not only challenging their methods but also framing it as a direct attack on the judicial system. This tactic shifts the narrative away from Lee Jae-myung’s legal troubles and places the Democratic Party in a defensive position.
Editor: Choo also referred to extreme expressions being used by the Democratic Party, such as “insane ruling” and “judicial murder.” What does this say about the overall environment of political discourse in South Korea right now?
Dr. Lee: The political climate in South Korea has become increasingly polarized. The rhetoric indicates a deep-seated mistrust toward the judiciary from certain political factions, which can be viewed as an attempt to mobilize base support. This sort of language escalates tensions rather than encourages dialogue. It’s a tactic that may energize their supporters but risks deepening the divides in public opinion.
Editor: Choo Kyung-ho urged the Democratic Party to stop what he calls “crime-proof, asphalt politics” and to humbly await the judiciary’s ruling. How do you interpret his call for responsibility amid these heated exchanges?
Dr. Lee: Choo’s statement is a demand for accountability, not just from the Democratic Party but also for the larger political class. He is essentially suggesting that political leaders should adhere to the law and not try to circumvent accountability under the guise of defending political interests. It’s a reminder that the rule of law is foundational in a democracy, and he is appealing for a return to that principle.
Editor: He also emphasized the need to focus on legislative activities that benefit the public, rather than engaging in political posturing. How critical is this perspective, especially with the national budget deadline approaching?
Dr. Lee: It’s very crucial. The national budget directly affects the livelihoods of citizens and can shape future policy directions. By stressing the importance of legislative duties over political gamesmanship, Choo is urging his fellow lawmakers to prioritize governance over political drama. If politicians can refocus on actionable policies instead of engaging in conflict, it could foster a more productive political atmosphere.
Editor: Lastly, with the trial of Lee Jae-myung approaching, what are the potential repercussions on both the parties involved and the political landscape as a whole?
Dr. Lee: The upcoming trial will act as a major turning point. If Lee Jae-myung faces heavy sentencing, the Democratic Party’s cohesion could be severely tested, and we may see a significant shift in voter sentiment. Conversely, if he’s acquitted, it could reinvigorate the party and promote a narrative of victimhood against judicial overreach. This trial will not just influence the immediate political fortunes of Lee and his party but could redefine party alignments and voter trust in the judicial system in the long term.
Editor: Thank you, Dr. Lee, for your insights. It’s a fascinating and complex time in South Korean politics, and we appreciate you shedding light on these issues.
Dr. Lee: Thank you for having me! It’s essential to keep the conversation going on these topics.