Citizen Movement shared that he will take before the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (Inter-American Court) of the Organization of American States (OAS) your complaint against the reform of the Judiciary.
This after the ministers of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation (SCJN) resolved do not invalidate judicial reformwhich is already published in the Official Gazette of the Federation (DOF).
The coordinator of the Citizen Movement in the Senate, Clemente Castanedawas in charge of announcing this decision, reiterating that “they will not surrender to power” by the reform of the Judiciary.
Citizen Movement will present a complaint to the Inter-American Court of the OAS against the reform of the Judicial Branch
After it was announced that the SCJN decided do not cancel the reform of the Judiciary, Movimiento Ciudadano shared what its decision will be in this regard.
Clemente Castaneda indicated that in a particular way they will go to the Inter-American Court of the OAS, to which they will request analyze the case.
In the same message, which was shared through their social networks, Clemente Castaneda recognized the efforts made by ministers of the SCJN who They defended the constitutional orderas well as the autonomy of the Judiciary.
And it is the orange coordinator in the Senate who accused that after the publication of the reform, our country will have to “compensate for the institutional damage caused by the new regime”.
Castaneda He also applauded the mobilizations that took place throughout the country for the reform of the Judiciary, reiterating the measure that they will take as an opposition party.
“I announce that we will go to the Inter-American Court of Human Rights to review this case. “This is not the time to surrender to power,” he said. Clemente Castañeda.
SCJN resolves not to invalidate the reform of the Judicial Branch
On Tuesday, November 5, the SCJN, 7 of the 11 ministers of the plenary session voted in favor of the origin of the unconstitutionality action against the reform of the Judiciary.
However, there was debate about the number of votes necessary to invalidate the reformbecause in the first instance it was said that a minimum of 8 votes were requiredalthough some ministers argued that only 6 were required.
It is worth mentioning that the own reform of the Judiciary points out that with at least 6 votes the SCJN has the power to invalidate contested norms, but it was also objected that the qualified majority of the plenary session was 8 of 11 ministers.
It was the discussion of the project presented by the minister Luis González Alcántara Carrancáwhich sought to invalidate a part of the judicial reform, in relation to the election of judges and magistrates for 2025.
Plenary of the SCJN (Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation)
Title: A Conversation on Judicial Reform and Citizen Advocacy: An Interview with Clemente Castañeda
Time.news Editor: Good day, Clemente. Thank you for joining us here at Time.news. The news regarding the judiciary reform in Mexico has certainly sparked widespread attention. Can you summarize the core issues surrounding the Supreme Court of Justice’s recent decision?
Clemente Castañeda: Thank you for having me. The recent decision by the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation (SCJN) not to invalidate the judicial reform has raised significant concerns about the autonomy of the judiciary and its ability to uphold constitutional values. This reform, in our view, compromises the democratic integrity of our judicial system.
Editor: You mentioned the importance of judicial autonomy. In your opinion, how does this reform threaten that autonomy?
Castañeda: The reform introduces mechanisms that can politicize judicial appointments and decisions, effectively placing the judiciary under the influence of the executive branch. This threatens the separation of powers, which is fundamental to our democracy. We must protect our judiciary from external pressures to maintain its independence.
Editor: Following the SCJN’s decision, you announced that the Citizen Movement will take this case to the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. What prompted this action?
Castañeda: We feel it is our duty not to surrender to power. By submitting a complaint to the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, we seek an international body to analyze the situation and assert our commitment to defending the constitutional order. This is not just about legal procedures; it’s about safeguarding our democracy and the rights of every citizen.
Editor: In your announcement, you also acknowledged the mobilizations that occurred across the country. How significant do you think public support is in this fight?
Castañeda: Extremely significant. These mobilizations reflect the will of the people and their commitment to justice and democracy. Public support acts as a powerful counterbalance to governmental actions. It is vital that citizens remain engaged and vocal about their rights and the principles of justice.
Editor: You indicated that there could be institutional damage resulting from this reform. Can you elaborate on that?
Castañeda: Yes, the publication of this reform creates a framework that undermines judicial independence and can lead to mistrust in our legal system. If citizens lose faith in the judiciary, that can have long-lasting repercussions for governance and the rule of law in our country. We must work to remedy any damages caused by this new regime.
Editor: As someone leading this movement, what next steps do you envision, both in the legal approach and in engaging the public?
Castañeda: We will continue our legal fight at the Inter-American Court, where we hope to amplify our concerns on an international stage. Concurrently, we will intensify our efforts to engage the public through campaigns, discussions, and educational initiatives, ensuring that citizens understand the implications of this reform and how they can take action.
Editor: It seems like a pivotal moment for the judiciary in Mexico. What message would you like to convey to those who are watching these developments closely?
Castañeda: My message is clear: this is not the time to surrender. Every citizen has a role to play in protecting our democracy. Stay informed, stay engaged, and don’t hesitate to stand up for your rights. Together, we can ensure that our judiciary remains a pillar of justice and fairness in our society.
Editor: Thank you, Clemente, for sharing your insights and for your commitment to this critical issue. We’ll continue to follow your efforts closely.
Castañeda: Thank you for the opportunity. It’s essential we keep this conversation going.