The scenario of Colo Colo In Copa Libertadores continues to complicate. This day the Conmebol confirmed the opening of disciplinary files to two referents of the campus: the coach Jorge Almirón and the footballer Arturo Vidal.
While waiting for the resolution of the canceled duel against Fortaleza at the Monumental Stadium, after disorders of its barristas, the ‘Cacique’ suffered a new ‘blow’ from the entity based in Paraguay, for events that occurred in front of Racing Club on the third date.
In the case of Almirón, the beginning of the investigation is linked to Article 5.11.6, numeral 2from the Club Manual of the Conmebol Libertadores 2025.
The aforementioned regulations talk about the delays of the equipment on the return after the break. “If the players of a team appear on the pitch later of the time scheduled for their resumption, or disregarding the indications of the referee and/or delegate in this regard, The responsible club and coach of the team in question will be sanctioned by the Conmebol Disciplinary Commission“, He details.
Being the first time in the edition of the tournament “a warning will be imposed to the club and warning to the coach,” adds the manual. Of course, it is added that “in the case of a second and subsequent infractions A minimum fine of USD 20,000 will be imposed for the club and a fine of USD 10,000 for the coach for each minute of delay ”.
The Enigma for ‘Vidal Case’
As for Arturo Vidal, the Conmebol document indicates that the cause of the file is Article 11.2 Q) of the Disciplinary Code of the Agency.
In this sense, the aforementioned standard is entitled under the title “Principles of conduct”. Then, the text establishes that “constitute, among others, attributable behaviors and sanctionable infractions to the aforementioned principles” and points out in letter Q, linked to the Vidal case, “Cause damage”.
The text does not give more details about what the ‘king’ did that meant the beginning of the procedure against him. That day, the only striking thing for the formed in Colo Colo was his ‘encounter’ with the media in a mixed area.
Record that the disciplinary code if it advances in the same article, in point 3, that in the event that the player is found guilty “The infractions to the aforementioned principles and norms are sanctioned in all cases by the judicial organs of Conmebol.”
Colo Colo Faces Conmebol Scrutiny: Expert Analysis on Disciplinary Actions
Time.news sits down with sports law expert Elena Rodriguez to dissect the recent disciplinary proceedings initiated by Conmebol against Colo Colo’s coach Jorge Almirón and player Arturo Vidal. we delve into the potential implications for the club and the broader landscape of Copa Libertadores.
Time.news: Elena, thank you for joining us. Colo Colo is currently facing a challenging situation with Conmebol opening disciplinary files against both their coach and a key player.Can you break down the situation for our readers?
Elena Rodriguez: Certainly. colo Colo’s participation in the Copa Libertadores 2025 is facing some turbulence. Coach Jorge Almirón is under investigation for potential violations of Article 5.11.6, numeral 2 of the Conmebol Libertadores 2025 Club Manual, related to delays in returning to the pitch after halftime. simultaneously, Arturo Vidal is facing scrutiny under Article 11.2 Q) of the Disciplinary Code, which centers around “Principles of Conduct” and specifically addresses actions that “cause damage.”
Time.news: Let’s start with Jorge almirón. What are the potential penalties involved in his case?
Elena rodriguez: The manual outlines a tiered system. For a first offense regarding team delays, both the club and the coach receive a warning.However, subsequent infractions carry meaningful financial penalties. The club could face a minimum fine of $20,000 USD, and the coach $10,000 USD, for each minute of delay. These stipulations apply if the team appear on the pitch later of the time scheduled for their resumption, or disregarding the indications of the referee and/or delegate in this regard.
Time.news: That sounds quite costly. What implications could this have for Colo Colo’s strategy and financial standing in the tournament?
Elena Rodriguez: It introduces a critical element of discipline and time management.Constant monitoring of schedules, especially during breaks, is now even more crucial. These potential fines could definitely affect the club’s overall budget for the Copa Libertadores campaign,possibly impacting player acquisitions or other necessary investments. this highlights how vital seemingly trivial aspects of game management can impact a team’s success.
Time.news: Now, let’s turn to the more ambiguous case surrounding Arturo Vidal. The charge is “causing damage” under Article 11.2 Q. What could this entail, and why is there so little facts available?
Elena Rodriguez: Article 11.2 Q is intentionally broad to cover a range of behaviors that violate the principles of conduct expected within Conmebol competitions. The lack of specific details is not unusual at this stage. Often, the specifics are withheld to avoid prejudicing the investigation. “Causing damage” could refer to anything from unsportsmanlike conduct towards referees or opponents, inappropriate statements that damage the reputation of the tournament, or even actions that insight fan behavior. This can include the encounter with media.
Time.news: What potential sanctions does Vidal face if found guilty?
Elena Rodriguez: The Disciplinary Code states that infractions against these principles are sanctioned by Conmebol’s judicial bodies. The code itself suggests that anything from a warning or monetary fine to suspension from playing could be issued depending on the precise nature of the incident and the perceived severity of the “damage” caused.
Time.news: This situation comes on top of the issues surrounding the canceled match against Fortaleza due to fan disturbances [2]. Is there a trend here, and what is Conmebol trying to achieve with these actions?
Elena Rodriguez: There is a clear message being sent to Colo Colo, and arguably, to all clubs participating in Conmebol competitions. Conmebol wants everyone involved, clubs and players, to know about the club manual []. They are determined to uphold the integrity of the competition and demanding greater disciplinary control, both on and off the field. They hope, acting tough will help the teams play their best. This involves enforcing everything from on-field conduct to pre-game adherence.
time.news: What can Colo Colo do to mitigate the potential damage and future incidents going forward?
Elena Rodriguez: First, they need to fully cooperate with Conmebol’s investigations. Internally, they should reinforce the importance of adhering to the competition’s regulations, focusing on punctuality and respectful conduct. Secondly, they might be facing sanctions regarding fans behaviour [3], the club needs to invest in better security measures around stadiums and implement stricter codes of conduct for fans to prevent future disruptions [2]. clear and consistent interaction with the players about their responsibilities as representatives of the club and the competition is crucial. Aníbal Mosa delivered some details of the Conmebol castigo to Colo Colo [1]
Time.news: Elena, thank you for your valuable insights. Its clear that colo Colo, and indeed all teams in the Copa Libertadores, need to be acutely aware of Conmebol’s regulations and expectations to avoid costly penalties and potential disruption to their campaigns.