The minister Lenia Batres indicated that 5 of the 14 sanctions against officials of the Judiciary were revoked by the Plenary Court.
You might be interested in: Confusion due to the closure of Plaza México and Estadio Azul
The above, during a conference given by the self-appointed “minister of the people” in which she detailed that last year the Federal Judicial Councilchaired by the minister president of the Mexican Supreme, Norma Piñareceived more than 10 thousand complaints against judges, magistrates and staff of which:
“14 judges, magistrates and officials were sanctioned. Of which, let me tell you, the Plenary Session of the Supreme Court, in its private sessions, has already revoked 5 of those 14 sanctions. There are no sanctions, it is a brave world, luxury remunerations, zero sanctions, guaranteed impunity, well of course they get angry.”
Despite the above, Batres Guadarrama He did not give details of which sanctions were revoked.
In September, the then head of the Ministry of Governorate, Luisa María Mayor He presented in La Mañanera a report alluding to the performance of the CJF, which he said “is not efficient” to monitor the behavior of the members of the Judiciary.
And as proof of his statements – based on data from the Council itself – he said that between 2004 and 2023, 38 thousand complaints were filed against officials of the Judicial, of which was discarded 86 percent (32,680), and that 5,320 were investigated.
Of that total investigated, they were sanctioned 472 juces y magistrates, 1.18 percent of the 38 thousand complaints, and these penalties were divided as follows:
- Warnings and reprimands: 292 (0.7 percent)
- Suspensions: 102 (0.27 percent)
- Dismissals: 41 (0.11 percent)
- Disqualification: 23 (0.06 percent)
- Economic penalty 14 (0.04 percent)
#DeTerror pic.twitter.com/Ee4wFuDLAw
— Lenia Batres (@LeniaBatres) November 3, 2024
ART
You might be interested in: Sheinbaum: we will respect the decision of the US people
Related
Time.news Editor: Good morning, everyone! Today, we have the pleasure of speaking with an expert on judicial governance and accountability, Dr. Eliana Ortiz. Thank you for joining us, Dr. Ortiz.
Dr. Eliana Ortiz: Thank you for having me! I’m excited to be here and discuss such an important topic.
Time.news Editor: Let’s dive right in. Recently, Minister Lenia Batres mentioned that five out of fourteen sanctions against officials in the judiciary were revoked by the Plenary Court. What does this indicate about the current state of judicial accountability in Mexico?
Dr. Eliana Ortiz: Well, it raises significant concerns about accountability and transparency within the judicial system. When a substantial number of sanctions are overturned, it can create a perception of a lack of accountability among judges and magistrates. It also sends a message that there may be a disconnect between the mechanisms designed to ensure justice and the reality of their enforcement.
Time.news Editor: Absolutely. Minister Batres referred to a ‘brave world’ with ‘zero sanctions’ and ‘guaranteed impunity.’ How does this rhetoric reflect broader concerns about corruption and accountability in the judiciary?
Dr. Eliana Ortiz: That rhetoric is striking and reflects deep-seated frustrations with the judicial system. It suggests that despite thousands of complaints—over 10,000 according to Batres—the actual disciplinary measures taken are inadequate. The language she uses points to a feeling of powerlessness among the public regarding judicial accountability. If judges feel shielded from consequences, it undermines public trust in the justice system.
Time.news Editor: In light of the revoked sanctions, what should be the next steps for the Federal Judicial Council and the Supreme Court to restore public trust?
Dr. Eliana Ortiz: Transparency is key. They need to publicly disclose the reasons behind revoking the sanctions to ensure that the process doesn’t seem arbitrary. Additionally, the implementation of robust oversight mechanisms and clear guidelines for disciplinary actions can help ensure that judges are held accountable. The public also deserves a voice in these matters, which can be achieved through civil engagement and oversight in judicial procedures.
Time.news Editor: It sounds like a multi-faceted approach is necessary. What role do you think the media plays in keeping both the judiciary and the public accountable in situations like this?
Dr. Eliana Ortiz: The media holds a vital role in promoting transparency. By investigating and reporting on judicial actions, they can shed light on issues that may otherwise go unnoticed by the public. Furthermore, by fostering public discourse around judicial accountability, the media can empower citizens to demand change. Engaging stories that highlight individual cases of accountability—or the lack thereof—can motivate civic action.
Time.news Editor: Thank you, Dr. Ortiz. Before we wrap up, what do you think is the most critical takeaway from Minister Batres’s statements and the whole situation surrounding the judiciary?
Dr. Eliana Ortiz: The most critical takeaway is that accountability in the judiciary is not just a matter for lawmakers or judges; it’s a societal issue. When the public loses faith in their judicial system, it affects the rule of law itself. All stakeholders, including the government, judiciary, and citizens, must work collaboratively towards a transparent and equitable system to ensure justice prevails.
Time.news Editor: Well said, Dr. Ortiz. Thank you for sharing your insights with us today. It’s a complex issue, but one that is vital for the health of democracy in Mexico.
Dr. Eliana Ortiz: Thank you for having me! Let’s hope for a system where accountability is robust and justice is truly served.
Time.news Editor: And thank you to our audience for tuning in. Stay informed and engaged!