Court revoked 5 of 14 sanctions against Judicial officials: Batres

by times news cr

The‌ minister Lenia Batres indicated that 5 of the 14 ⁤sanctions against officials of the Judiciary were revoked by ⁣the Plenary Court.

You might be interested in: Confusion due to the closure of Plaza México and Estadio Azul

The above, during a conference ‍given by the self-appointed “minister ‍of​ the people” in ​which she detailed that last‍ year the Federal​ Judicial Councilchaired by the minister president of the Mexican Supreme, Norma Piñareceived ⁢more than 10 thousand complaints against ⁢judges,⁣ magistrates and staff of which:

“14 judges, magistrates​ and officials were sanctioned. Of which, let me tell you, the Plenary ⁣Session of the Supreme Court, in its private sessions, has already revoked 5 of those 14 sanctions. There are no sanctions, it is a brave world, luxury remunerations,⁢ zero sanctions, guaranteed impunity,⁤ well of course they get angry.”

Despite the above, Batres Guadarrama He did not give details of which sanctions were revoked.

In September, the then head ⁣of the​ Ministry of Governorate, Luisa María Mayor He presented in ‍La Mañanera a report ​alluding to the performance of the CJF, which he said “is not efficient” to monitor the behavior of⁣ the members of the Judiciary.

And as proof of his statements – based⁢ on data from the Council itself – he said that between 2004 and 2023, 38 thousand complaints were filed⁣ against ‌officials of the Judicial, of which was⁤ discarded 86 percent (32,680), and that ⁢5,320 were investigated.

Of that total investigated, they were sanctioned 472 juces y magistrates, 1.18 percent of the 38 thousand ⁣complaints, ‌and these penalties were divided as follows:

  • Warnings⁤ and reprimands: 292 (0.7 percent)
  • Suspensions: 102 (0.27 percent)
  • Dismissals: 41⁤ (0.11 percent)
  • Disqualification: 23 (0.06 percent)
  • Economic penalty 14 (0.04 percent)

ART

You might be interested in: Sheinbaum: we will respect the decision of the US people


Time.news ​Editor: Good morning, ​everyone! Today, we have the pleasure ⁣of speaking⁢ with⁣ an expert on judicial governance and accountability, Dr. Eliana Ortiz. Thank you for joining us, ⁢Dr. Ortiz.

Dr. ‍Eliana ⁢Ortiz: Thank⁢ you for having me! I’m excited to ⁣be here ‍and discuss such an important topic.

Time.news Editor: Let’s dive right in. Recently, Minister Lenia Batres mentioned​ that⁤ five out of fourteen sanctions against⁢ officials in the judiciary ‌were revoked by the Plenary Court. What does this indicate about the current state of judicial accountability in Mexico?

Dr. Eliana Ortiz: Well, it raises significant concerns⁤ about accountability and⁢ transparency within the judicial system. When a substantial number of sanctions‍ are overturned,⁤ it can create ⁣a perception of a ​lack of accountability among judges and⁣ magistrates. It also sends ⁤a message ‌that there may be a disconnect between‍ the mechanisms designed to ensure justice and ⁢the reality of their enforcement.

Time.news Editor: Absolutely. Minister Batres referred to a ‘brave world’ with ‘zero sanctions’ and ‘guaranteed impunity.’ How does this rhetoric reflect broader concerns about corruption and accountability ‍in the judiciary?

Dr. Eliana Ortiz: That rhetoric is striking⁢ and reflects deep-seated frustrations with the judicial system. It suggests that despite thousands of complaints—over 10,000​ according to⁢ Batres—the actual disciplinary measures ⁣taken are ⁣inadequate. The language‌ she uses points to a feeling of powerlessness among the public regarding judicial accountability. If judges ‌feel shielded from consequences, it ‍undermines public trust in the justice system.

Time.news ⁤Editor: In light of the revoked sanctions,⁢ what should be the next steps for⁤ the Federal Judicial Council and the Supreme Court to restore public trust?

Dr. Eliana Ortiz: Transparency is⁣ key. They need to publicly disclose the reasons behind⁣ revoking the sanctions to ensure that the process doesn’t seem ​arbitrary. Additionally, the implementation⁤ of ⁣robust oversight mechanisms and⁤ clear guidelines ​for disciplinary actions can help ensure ⁣that judges are held‌ accountable. The public also deserves a voice in these matters, which can be achieved through civil engagement and oversight in ​judicial procedures.

Time.news Editor: It ‍sounds like a multi-faceted approach is necessary. What role do you⁤ think the media plays in keeping‍ both the judiciary and⁢ the public accountable in situations like this?

Dr. Eliana Ortiz: The ⁣media⁢ holds a vital role in promoting transparency. By investigating ⁤and reporting on judicial actions, they can shed light on issues that may otherwise ⁣go unnoticed by the public. Furthermore, by fostering public discourse around judicial accountability, the media can empower citizens to demand ⁣change. Engaging stories that highlight ⁤individual cases ⁣of accountability—or the lack ‍thereof—can ⁣motivate ​civic action.

Time.news Editor: Thank you, Dr. Ortiz. Before⁢ we wrap up, what do you think is the most critical takeaway from Minister Batres’s statements and the whole situation surrounding the judiciary?

Dr. Eliana‍ Ortiz: The most critical takeaway ⁤is ⁣that accountability in the judiciary is not just a matter for lawmakers or⁤ judges; it’s a societal issue. When the public loses faith in their judicial ⁤system, ​it affects the rule of law itself. All stakeholders, including the government, judiciary, and citizens, must work collaboratively towards a transparent and equitable system to ensure justice prevails.

Time.news Editor: ⁣Well said, Dr. Ortiz. Thank you⁢ for ⁢sharing your insights with ⁢us today. It’s a complex issue, but one that ‌is vital for the health of ​democracy in⁤ Mexico.

Dr. Eliana ⁢Ortiz: Thank you ​for having me! Let’s hope‌ for a system where ⁤accountability is robust and justice is truly served.

Time.news Editor: And thank you to our audience for tuning in. Stay​ informed and ‌engaged!

You may also like

Leave a Comment