Democratic Party considers designating former commander Kwak Jong-geun and 707th Group leader Kim Hyun-tae as public interest informants after ‘confession of conscience over telephone instructions’

by times news cr
Former special Forces​ Commander Kwak Jong-geun (left) and Kim Hyun-tae,⁣ head of the 707 Special Forces Command.

on the 13th, the Democratic Party of Korea’s Corruption and Public Interest Informant⁤ Rights Protection Committee ‍(Chairman Jeon ⁣Hyun-hee) proposed a plan to designate former Special Forces Commander​ Kwak jong-geun and ⁣707 Special Forces Director kim ‌Hyun-tae,​ who revealed the inside story ⁣of martial law⁤ after the ’12/3 ‍civil war’, as public ‌interest informants of the ⁤Democratic Party and ​protect ​them at ⁣the party⁣ level. He said it was under review.

The Democratic Party’s ‌Rights Protection Committee said on‍ this⁢ day, “Former commander Kwak and Special Director Kim are‍ the key people involved in this ⁣rebellion, but they have laid the groundwork for uncovering the truth of the situation by declaring to the Democratic Party members the circumstances that Yoon⁤ Seok-yeol‌ directly ordered the intrusion into the National Assembly, etc. “I provided it,” he ​said, revealing the ‌background⁢ to the review of designation as ​a public interest informant. However, as former Commander Kwak and Special Director Kim ⁤are deeply involved in the​ civil unrest, it is reported that the final decision on whether to designate them as public interest informants will be made after carefully reviewing their testimony and weighing the‍ need for punishment and protection.

Rep. Jeon Hyun-hee, who served as⁤ chairperson, said, “With the courageous public interest reports of the Democratic Party’s public interest informants No. ⁣1 (kang Hye-kyung), No.2 (Shin‍ Yong-han), and No. 3 (Kim tae-yeol),the truth that the Myeong Tae-gyun Gate was actually the Yoon Seok-yeol-Kim Geon-hee ⁢Gate began to‌ be revealed,and⁤ our society He said,“I‍ hope that the truth behind ⁢the 12/3 martial law rebellion will ⁣be revealed ⁤through reports from public interest informants.” emphasized.

Meanwhile, the Democratic party’s Rights Protection Committee, which was officially launched on the 15th of last month,⁣ has established ‌the ‘Public Interest Reporting Center on Power-type Corruption under the⁤ Yoon Seok-yeol ⁣Government’ and is receiving reports from the ‍public on ⁢’Power-type corruption under ⁤the Yoon Seok-yeol Government’ and ‘Suspicious Cases​ of State Affairs Abuse Around the President’s Office.’

Reporter AhnGyu-young [email protected]

  • Hot ‍news ⁢now

    • what are the historical implications of ​military influence on South korean politics, particularly in the context of civil unrest?

      Interview Between Time.news Editor and Expert on ‌South ​Korean Military History and Politics

      Time.news Editor: Thank you for joining us today. We have an intriguing topic at ⁢hand involving recent ⁣developments in South Korean politics and military history. The Democratic‌ Party of Korea is proposing to designate former Special ​Forces Commander Kwak ⁢Jong-geun and 707 Special Forces Director Kim Hyun-tae as public‌ interest informants due‌ to their revelations about the civil unrest and alleged martial law orders. What’s your take on this?

      expert: Thank ⁣you for having me. This situation is quite notable in terms⁢ of both political ⁤implications and military accountability in South Korea.The designation of Kwak and Kim as public interest informants suggests that their testimonies are viewed as crucial ‌to uncovering⁤ the truth about the events surrounding ‌the 12/3 civil unrest. It illustrates ⁢how military insiders⁣ are starting to speak‌ up against⁣ political machinations.

      Time.news Editor: ‍Can you elaborate on the historical context that led to Kwak and Kim’s testimonies? why is this​ moment so‌ vital?

      Expert: Absolutely.⁢ The 12/3 civil unrest is frequently enough linked to broader issues of governmental overreach ⁣and the militarization of politics in ⁢South Korea.Historically, the military has played a pivotal role in‍ shaping the ⁣country’s politics, and incidents of civil unrest often prompt scrutiny of military ⁤orders and directives. Kwak and Kim’s willingness ⁤to come forward signals a potential shift towards transparency—a theme that’s ‌essential⁢ in a democracy still grappling⁣ with its past.

      Time.news Editor: The⁢ report mentions ⁤that ⁢their testimonies could reveal a connection between the military actions and the political leadership of yoon Seok-yeol. How crucial is it for the public to understand these‍ connections?

      Expert: It’s extremely crucial. Understanding the ‌interplay between military ⁤and executive actions ​can help citizens grasp‍ how power dynamics operate within their government. if it⁣ can be proven that Yoon Seok-yeol​ gave orders that led to military interventions concerning civilian governance, it raises serious questions about accountability and​ civil rights ⁣in South Korea. This could affect public trust in the institutions that are supposed to‌ uphold democracy.

      Time.news Editor: The committee is said to be cautious about how they handle the designation of‌ Kwak and⁢ Kim. ⁢What factors do you think will influence their final decision?

      Expert:⁤ They are ​grappling with the need for potential protection of these informants given their deep involvement in the civil unrest. On one hand, recognizing them ⁢as public interest informants can provide them with some safety, ‌while also encouraging other potential whistleblowers to come forward. Conversely, there could be backlash regarding their previous roles during the unrest. The ‌committee needs to balance the⁤ pursuit of truth with⁢ the implications of their past actions.

      Time.news Editor: It truly seems that former chairperson Jeon⁣ hyun-hee‌ is ⁣advocating for this ‌truth to emerge. What role do individuals⁤ like her play in ​the broader narrative of accountability and reform in south Korea?

      Expert:‌ Figures ​like Jeon Hyun-hee are pivotal. They can ⁣act as catalysts for change ⁣by⁢ championing transparency and accountability within the party and ⁢the government. By positioning the testimony of Kwak and Kim ‌as vital to understanding the full ⁤story‌ behind‍ the unrest, ​she is reinforcing ⁤the importance of democratic oversight. Her leadership can inspire a culture where civil servants and military personnel feel empowered⁢ to‌ address injustices without fear of retribution.

      Time.news Editor: Thank you for ‍that ⁣insightful analysis. As we see this situation evolve, what should we be watching for in the coming weeks?

      Expert: Watch​ for the careful dance of political and‍ military revelations. Specifically, monitor how the Democratic Party’s leadership handles the testimonies ​of ⁤Kwak and Kim and what implications their designations, or lack thereof, have on public trust and military engagement in politics.also, ⁣watch for any emerging testimonies from ⁣other individuals who⁣ may feel encouraged to ⁢speak out as a result of this.

      Time.news ‍Editor: Excellent points.Thank‍ you for your expertise on this matter, and we look forward to ⁢discussing further developments with you in the future.

      Expert: Thank you for having me. I look forward to our next conversation.

You may also like

Leave a Comment