Democratic Party “We will reject the ‘tax cut’ inheritance and gift tax law”

by times news cr
Park Chan-dae, floor⁣ leader of the ⁤Democratic Party of⁣ Korea,⁢ is attending the ‘press conference on ​the​ 2025 budget and national inquiry plan for Marines killed in the​ line of ​duty’ held at the‌ National Assembly in ⁣Yeouido, Seoul​ on the 1st. 2024.12.1/News⁣ 1 (Seoul = News ⁣1)”/>
Park Chan-dae, floor leader of the Democratic party of Korea, is attending the ‘press conference on the 2025 budget and national investigation plan for ⁤Marines killed in the line ⁤of duty’ held at the National ⁢Assembly in Yeouido, Seoul⁣ on the ⁤1st. 2024.12.1/News 1 (Seoul = news‍ 1)

‌ The Democratic Party of Korea decided to process bills⁤ accompanying the ⁤budget bill, including a ⁤revision to the Income Tax Act⁢ that‍ includes ​the abolition of​ the financial investment income tax (gold investment tax), at the plenary session of ⁤the National ​Assembly on the⁤ 2nd.the Restriction of Special Taxation Act (Special Taxation Act) and the Value-Added Tax Act plan to be passed by revising the content related to‌ the separate​ taxation of dividend‍ income‍ advocated ⁤by the government and the ruling party. The Democratic Party decided to reject‍ the Inheritance Tax and Gift Tax Act (Inheritance ‍and ⁢Gift Tax‍ Act) among ‌the tax law amendments submitted by the ‍government ​on the grounds that it was a ‘tax cut for the rich’.

Park Chan-dae,⁣ floor leader of the Democratic Party, held a press conference at the National‌ Assembly on ⁣the 1st‌ and said, “among the 13 bills⁢ designated by the ⁣government as budget-related bills, 8 bills without contentious issues will‌ be passed by agreement, and the 5 ⁣bills‌ with contentious issues will be passed‌ based on ⁣political⁢ judgment.” “We decided to revise the‍ parts that needed​ to be revised and reject the parts that needed to ⁢be rejected,” he said. An official ‍from the​ Democratic Party gave the reason for the rejection, saying, “The Inheritance⁣ and Gift Tax Act has ⁣strong⁣ characteristics of a ‘tax cut for the⁣ ultra-rich,’ such as expanding the application of corporate inheritance deductions⁣ and lowering‌ the tax rate‌ for the inheritance⁤ tax ‍and gift tax⁣ for tax bases⁣ exceeding 1 billion won from 50% to 40%.” explained.

A Democratic Party official said,“The Special‍ Tax Act and the‌ Value-Added Tax Act also include tax cuts for ​the‌ rich,such as separate ‍taxation of dividend income,so ‌we will​ process them after revising them.” After Representative Lee Jae-myung ⁤expressed⁣ his positive stance​ on ​separate taxation of dividend income at a recent⁣ meeting with the ​business community, conflicting ⁤opinions emerged⁣ within the party, sparking ⁤controversy. ⁣

⁣ An official from the Ministry of ​Strategy and Finance ⁢said, “as the differences ⁤between the ruling and opposition parties have not been ​resolved on major‌ budget-related ​bills ‍such as inheritance tax relief, a government bill will ⁢be presented at the ‍plenary session.” “If it is indeed passed,there will⁣ inevitably​ be inconsistencies ​in the government’s household account book,” he explained.
‌ ⁣

However, it is expected that the likelihood of the budget ancillary bill​ being ⁤passed as planned‍ by the government⁤ is low.An official ​from the Ministry of Strategy and​ Finance said, “Even if a budget ancillary bill is submitted ⁤to⁣ the plenary session ‌as per ‌the government’s ⁣plan, the ruling party is expected to‍ submit⁢ an amendment bill as per the⁤ ruling party and the opposition party is​ expected to submit an ⁤amendment as per⁤ the opposition party.” “

A Democratic Party leadership official said, ‍“Depending on the attitude⁣ of the government and ruling party, there is ample room for additional⁣ negotiations, excluding tax cuts for the ⁣wealthy.”

Reporter Seungwoo lee [email protected]
Sejong =⁣ Reporter Soon-gu Jeong [email protected]

  • Hot news now

    What are the potential consequences of‍ internal conflicts within the Democratic Party on the upcoming budget proposals?

    Interview Title:⁤ Navigating the Budgetary Crossroads: Insights from ‌the Democratic PartyS Recent Decisions

    Interviewer (Time.news Editor): Welcome, and thank you for joining us today! We have the pleasure of ​speaking with Dr. Kim⁢ Ji-soo, a⁢ political economist⁢ and ⁢expert on taxation policies in⁢ South korea. Today,‍ we’re delving into the recent decisions‍ made by the Democratic Party of​ Korea regarding the⁤ budget bill and proposed⁤ tax revisions​ that ‍have sparked⁢ much debate.

    Dr.‍ Kim Ji-soo: Thank you⁤ for⁣ having me. It’s ‌great to discuss these timely and crucial matters.

    Editor: Let’s jump right in. The Democratic Party decided⁢ to process the budget bill without the controversial Inheritance and Gift Tax Act. Can you ⁣elaborate on ⁣the implications of this decision, notably ⁣how it⁤ may affect income inequality?

    Dr.Kim⁤ Ji-soo: absolutely. By rejecting the Inheritance and Gift Tax act, the Democratic Party is clearly signaling ⁣their intent to ⁤avoid ​policies that may ⁢disproportionately benefit the wealthy. The provisions in the ‌proposed act included a reduction‌ of the inheritance tax rate for substantial inheritances, which critics argued woudl be a “tax cut for the ultra-rich.” By maintaining a stronger tax policy for these groups,‍ they could ⁣help⁣ reduce income inequality, which is a pressing issue in South Korea.

    editor: That’s a crucial⁤ point. The floor leader,⁤ Park Chan-dae,‌ mentioned that they aim to revise certain ⁤contentious parts of the budget​ while passing the less‌ controversial bills.What criteria do you think ⁢the​ Democratic Party is using to​ determine which bills are deemed ‘contentious’?

    Dr. Kim Ji-soo: The Democratic Party ⁤appears to be weighing both political ramifications and public sentiment. bills that⁢ could lead to significant public outcry or that are likely to deepen divisions—such as those perceived as favoring the ​affluent—are probably classified as contentious. Their approach‍ seems strategic; they wont ‍to garner support for the less contentious aspects while navigating the‌ more ⁤divisive issues⁤ thru ​careful negotiation and adjustment.

    Editor: It’s interesting you mention negotiation.Following representative Lee Jae-myung’s positive stance on separate taxation of dividend ⁤income, conflicting opinions have emerged ⁤within the party. How do you see this internal party conflict impacting their ​ability⁣ to form a unified ⁤budget?

    Dr. Kim Ji-soo: ⁣ Internal conflicts can‌ be detrimental for party cohesion and⁤ effectiveness. The differing views on taxation strategies illustrate a rift between​ a more progressive faction and a centrist or moderate group within ⁣the party. If these disagreements aren’t managed thoughtfully, they could hinder the party’s ability⁤ to present a cohesive budget proposal, which could ultimately alienate some constituents who expect decisive action on wealth inequality.

    Editor: ‌ You mentioned the⁢ risk of alienation. With major policy decisions involving taxes and budget allocations being influenced by party politics, how do constituents typically respond to these⁤ conflicts?

    Dr. Kim Ji-soo: ⁤Public response tends to be quite reactive. many citizens are acutely ⁤aware of how⁢ taxation directly impacts their lives. If a party appears to be indecisive or inconsistent in its‍ taxation⁤ policies, especially on issues‍ like wealth distribution, it may lose the support of voters who​ prioritize economic equality. Though, if the constituents perceive that the party is genuinely trying to balance economic realities ‌with social justice, they may remain supportive despite internal disagreements.

    Editor: That’s a nuanced perspective, Dr. Kim. As we⁣ look ahead, what potential outcomes should ⁣we ​anticipate in the upcoming National⁢ Assembly session regarding these bills?

    Dr. Kim Ji-soo: I expect a vigorous debate. The party will⁣ likely prioritize passing the less contentious bills but may face⁤ significant ⁣challenges in reconciling differing‍ views on taxation—particularly concerning ‍dividend income and other proposals deemed advantageous to wealthy ⁣individuals.If they successfully navigate these disagreements, they could craft a budget ⁢that not only passes but⁢ also aligns more closely with their stated commitment ⁣to⁢ reducing income inequality.

    Editor: Thank ⁢you,‍ Dr. Kim, for your insights into these complex dynamics. As we continue to monitor the developments surrounding‌ the budget session, your expertise will ⁣be invaluable⁢ in helping us understand these significant issues.

    Dr. Kim Ji-soo: Thank you ‌for having me! I look forward to seeing how these discussions⁤ evolve.

    Editor: ⁢And to⁣ our audience, thank you ⁤for joining us ⁣today.​ Stay ⁢tuned for more updates ⁤as this story⁢ continues to unfold!

    You may also like

    Leave a Comment