Of the almost 1,200 cases that are backlogged, including some from 30 years ago, the Instructing Section of the Chamber of Deputies will focus on the most recent, of which eight are in reserve, said the president of the Jurisdictional Commission, Hugo Eric Flores (Morena).
Of these files that will review their origin, he detailed that there are those of the now senator of the PRI, Alejandro Moreno; the former president of the INE, Lorenzo Córdova; the electoral advisor, Ciro Murayama; the attorney general of the Republic, Alejandro Gertz and the former minister of the SCJN, Arturo Zaldívar.
You might be interested: SCJN orders the Congress of Chiapas to decriminalize abortion
“There is talk about many things. We are reviewing, I have been saying that there were eight in reserve, for which we are reviewing, but there may be many important ones. I have also commented that I perceive that there is a lot of prescribed topic and we will see that we can remove all the topic that is already prescribed in a single opinion,” said the legislator.
He mentioned that some of the requests “make him laugh” because they are supported by journalistic reports, “of course, respecting the work of the press, it is very difficult for a journalistic report to be presented as evidence to say, well, carry out the impeachment trial.”
He said that in any case the tests will be evaluated, which is the task of the Investigative Section, whose integration was published today in the Official Gazette of the Federation.
You might be interested in: Traitor to the Homeland: they protest against Minister Pérez Dayán
Flores considered that before the current regular period ends in December it will be possible to determine whether or not some of these eight files can proceed with the impeachment request.
On whether there would be the possibility of undertaking a political trial against judges and ministers of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation (SCJN) that sought to invalidate the judicial reform, Flores indicated that this would only proceed if there was a request for impeachment, otherwise, there would be no matter.
“Until now, we are only aware of one matter presented by some PT deputies, with respect to judges and ministers,” he explained.
You might be interested in: Claudia Anaya asks to remove Rosario Piedra from the shortlist for CNDH
On October 22, the Parliamentary Group of the Labor Party (PT) presented the request for impeachment against eight ministers of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation (SCJN) who, “have attacked democratic institutions and violated constitutional supremacy.”
The Instructor Section In addition to Flores as president, Adriana Belinda Quiroz Gallegos, Secretary (Morena) was integrated; Germán Martínez Cázares, Secretary (PAN) and Raúl Bolaños-Cacho Cué, Secretary (PVEM).
MSA
Related
Interview: Time.news Editor and Expert in Legislative Affairs
Time.news Editor: Welcome, everyone, to another insightful segment where we explore pressing issues in legislation and governance. Today, we’re joined by Dr. Laura Martínez, an expert in legislative affairs and political accountability. Thank you for being with us, Laura.
Dr. Laura Martínez: Thank you for having me. It’s a pleasure to discuss such significant matters!
Editor: Let’s dive right in. We’ve recently been informed about the backlog of nearly 1,200 cases that the Instructing Section of the Chamber of Deputies is tackling. Some of these date as far back as 30 years. What do you think could be the implications of addressing these old cases now?
Dr. Martínez: Addressing old cases can have several implications. First, it shows a commitment to accountability and justice, which can restore public faith in the political system. However, it can also lead to complications, especially if evidence has since become lost or if key witnesses are no longer available.
Editor: Indeed. You mentioned some key figures whose cases are being reviewed, including Senator Alejandro Moreno and former INE president Lorenzo Córdova. How important is it to scrutinize the actions of such high-profile individuals?
Dr. Martínez: It’s crucial. High-profile cases often set precedents. If accountability is applied uniformly, it reinforces the rule of law. However, if these figures are perceived as protected or privileged, it could further erode public trust, which is already a significant issue in many democracies today.
Editor: Hugo Eric Flores, the president of the Jurisdictional Commission, expressed that some of the requests surrounding these cases “make him laugh” because they are based on journalistic reports. How do you view the role of the press in legal and legislative accountability?
Dr. Martínez: The press plays a vital role. Investigative journalism often brings to light information that may otherwise remain hidden. However, it should complement legal evidence, not replace it. For legislators to say that journalistic reports carry no weight could undermine future investigations and discourage the media from pursuing important stories.
Editor: Flores also mentioned the importance of evaluating the tests and evidence presented. What kind of evidence would you consider substantial in these situations?
Dr. Martínez: Substantial evidence should be concrete and credible. While journalistic reports can provide leads, primary evidence, such as documents, recordings, and eyewitness testimonies, holds much more weight in legal contexts. Effective investigations require a blend of qualitative and quantitative evidence.
Editor: Moving forward, what steps do you believe should be prioritized to tackle not only the current backlog but also prevent such situations in the future?
Dr. Martínez: First, improving administrative efficiency in legislative bodies is essential. Streamlining processes and setting clear timelines for investigations could help. Additionally, fostering a culture of transparency and regular audits could prevent backlogs from occurring again.
Editor: Those are valuable suggestions, Laura. Given the complexities and political sensitivities involved, do you foresee any backlash from the political community as these cases are pursued?
Dr. Martínez: There’s always potential for backlash, especially when you’re dealing with influential figures. However, if the pursuit of justice is transparent and grounded in the rule of law, it could also bolster public support for those in authority. It’s about ensuring that the process appears fair and justifiable.
Editor: Thank you, Dr. Laura Martínez, for sharing your insights today. It’s crucial to continuously discuss legislative accountability and justice in our political landscape.
Dr. Martínez: Thank you for having me! It’s been a pleasure to discuss these important issues.