US President-elect Donald Trump said on Saturday that the United States should not interfere in the conflict in Syria, in light of the advance of the opposition factions and their approach to the capital, Damascus.
Trump wrote in a post on his “Truth social” social media platform, “syria is in chaos, but it is indeed not our friend, and the United States should not have anything to do with it.” this is not our fight. Let the situation take its course. “Do not interfere.”
Trump added, “The opposition forces, in an unprecedented step, took complete control of many cities in a highly coordinated attack, and are now on the outskirts of Damascus, apparently preparing to make a major move toward overthrowing Assad.”
Trump pointed out that “Russia, because of its preoccupation in Ukraine and the losses it incurred there, which exceeded 600,000 soldiers, seems unable to stop this advance in Syria.”
On Thursday, the US Department of Defense said, through its spokesman Pat Ryder, that the United States “does not plan to communicate with Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham, which is classified as a terrorist group,” adding that “the United States has nothing to do with what is happening in Syria.”
The Syrian opposition factions led by Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham, which is listed on US terrorist lists, continue their lightning attack, which they launched on November 27, starting from their stronghold in Idlib (northwest), towards areas controlled by government forces.
On Thursday, Syrian opposition factions took control of the city of Hama, the fourth largest city in Syria, days after they took control of Aleppo, which was completely out of the regime’s control for the first time since the outbreak of the conflict in 2011.
Opposition forces also advanced towards the city of Homs in central Syria, while Kurdish fighters took control of its eastern desert on Friday.
A US-backed coalition led by Syrian Kurdish fighters also took control of the city of Deir ez-Zor, a major focal point for the government in the desert areas in the east of the country, making it the third major city that Assad lost control of within a week, after Aleppo and Hama.
Last updated: December 7, 2024 – 18:32
Suggest a correction
How might the recent gains of the Syrian opposition factions affect U.S. foreign policy in the region?
Interview: Analyzing the Syrian Conflict and U.S. Non-Interference with dr. Sarah Thompson, Middle Eastern Affairs Expert
Editor: Welcome, Dr. Thompson. With the recent statements from President-elect Donald Trump regarding the situation in Syria, there’s a renewed focus on U.S. involvement—or lack thereof— in this prolonged conflict. Can you summarize Trump’s position on this issue?
Dr. Thompson: Thank you for having me. President Trump has made it clear that he believes the U.S. should refrain from intervening in the Syrian conflict, stating, “syria is in chaos, but it is indeed not our friend, and the United States should not have anything to do with it.” He’s advocating for a non-interference policy as the opposition factions gain ground against Assad’s regime, especially with their recent advancements toward Damascus.
Editor: what implications do these statements have for the ongoing conflict in Syria?
Dr. Thompson: Trump’s remarks underscore a meaningful shift in U.S. foreign policy. By distancing itself from the Syrian conflict, the U.S. is essentially allowing the dynamics on the ground to unfold without American intervention. This coudl embolden opposition factions, and if they successfully topple Assad, it may lead to a power vacuum or further instability in the region. On the flip side, it also reduces the risk of U.S. entanglement in a complex and volatile situation.
Editor: You mentioned the Syrian opposition’s significant gains in recent weeks. Can you elaborate on their recent successes and the factors contributing to their advances?
Dr. Thompson: Sure. The Syrian opposition has achieved remarkable momentum, recently capturing key cities like Aleppo and Hama, and pushing towards Homs.Their coordinated attacks are unprecedented and suggest a high level of organization and support, possibly even from external sources. These gains coincide with Russia’s preoccupation with its military operations in Ukraine, which has seemingly weakened their ability to support Assad effectively in Syria.
Editor: Given the complexities surrounding the Syrian conflict, particularly the involvement of groups like Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham, how should the U.S. approach its relationships with these factions, particularly those deemed terrorist organizations?
Dr. Thompson: This is indeed a challenging situation. The U.S.department of Defence’s position, which states they will not communicate with Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham, is a prudent one in terms of avoiding legitimizing terrorist organizations. However, it also raises questions about the effectiveness of U.S. policy. Engaging with local factions, while navigating their affiliations and actions, could be vital for establishing stability in the region. The U.S. may need to consider indirect support for moderate factions to counterbalance extremist groups while maintaining its stance against terrorism.
Editor: As we look at this situation through a broader lens, what practical advice would you offer to our readers who are trying to understand this evolving conflict?
Dr. Thompson: I would encourage readers to stay informed through multiple reputable news sources, as the situation in Syria is highly fluid. Understanding the history of the conflict, the key players involved, and the geopolitical implications can provide context for the developments. It’s also critically important to recognize the human element in these scenarios—the impact on civilians and the humanitarian crisis, which continue to be dire. Engaging with organizations that provide relief and support for those affected can also be a way to contribute positively.
Editor: Thank you, Dr. Thompson.Yoru insights into the complexity of the Syrian conflict and U.S. foreign policy are incredibly valuable as we navigate these turbulent times.
Dr. Thompson: Thank you for having me! It’s essential that we keep discussing these issues. The stakes are high,and understanding the dynamics at play will be crucial for informed decision-making moving forward.