2023-07-22 17:30:00
DEBRIEFING – Pascal Najadi is a Swiss and British citizen, former member of the Swiss Air Force and investment banker (Merrill Lynch international, member of the board of directors of the Dresdner Bank in New York and London). He has also been an advisor to heads of state and ministers of several countries in the field of strategic advice in times of crisis. In 2021, he and several members of his family will receive three doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech anti-Covid-19 vaccine. He then trusts the speech of the Swiss Minister of Health Alain Berset about a medicinal product “tested, safe and effective”, who was going “immunize the whole population”. In order to fight against the pandemic, as a citizen, the former banker is certain to make the right choice to protect himself and others, in complete safety. In October 2022, he becomes aware of statements by Janine Small, one of the directors of Pfizer, made during a session of the European Parliament. This reveals to the general public that its product has not been sufficiently tested before its marketing and that the vaccine has never prevented the transmission of the virus. Elements that are at least different from those that had previously been relayed by politicians, health authorities and their media outlets to justify the use of the anti-Covid-19 vaccine… (Read more below the video)
It’s a turning point. Pascal Nadaji suffers from side effects related to his injections, which have been clinically evaluated by several doctors and specialists. He feels that his immune system has been badly affected and feels “die slowly”. He decides to enter into a process of legal denunciation of the laws which have framed, generally in a very coercive way, the management of the Covid and does not hesitate to file a first complaint against Alain Berset.
His view of the management of the health crisis is clear-cut, severe and controversial: according to him, the health crisis has been managed by States and health authorities as a “psychological operation”. This management would have been based on products presented as vaccines whose final toxicity could not be ignored by manufacturers and politicians. In other words, their recourse would have been made for a malicious purpose.
In a previous Debriefing, France-Evening referred to the controversy which opposed Dr. Martin Zizi and MEP Nathalie Loiseau on the social network Twitter. The MEP from the Renaissance group attacked one of her colleagues, Virginie Joron (National Rally group) on the issue of compensation for victims of the side effects of anti-Covid-19 vaccines. Madame Loiseau assimilated in a tweet this approach to a “conspiracy theory”, issue d’un “populism” related to “the extreme right”.
Pascal Nadaji does not hesitate to participate in this muscular exchange with a scathing response against MP Loiseau, in the form of a long tweet whose audience is over 350,000 views (see below).
In this debriefing, we return to the history of Mr. Nadaji, his present and future actions and evoke this response addressed to the European deputy of the Renaissance group Nathalie Loiseau.
France-Evening tried to contact Mrs. Nathalie Loiseau, who did not wish to answer our questions to date.
Dear Natalie,
I truly believe that you are either being paid to write such nonsensical accusations here on Twitter, or downright unintelligent or, what I sincerely hope, misinformed, brainwashed. Let me tell you here bluntly and without… pic.twitter.com/s8QEhvzmBu
— Pascal Najadi ???????????????????????????????????????? (@Najadi4Justice) July 18, 2023
*Platonic formula.
#vaccine #side #effects #politics #Pascal #Najadi #responds #MEP #Nathalie #Loiseau #knowledge #ignorance #judge