Regretful? The Glamor Magazine hopened deleted the publication of the Angela Aguilar like the “Woman of the Year” , after petition of users that they sought to take away his title.
The past November 4the magazine Glamor, through its social networks, announced the list of women who would be recognized by the magazine this year.
However, something that caused a stir, as well as some criticism, was that the name of Ángela Aguilar appeared, who recently found herself involved in controversy once again, after the statements she gave, where she indicated that “she had a clear conscience ”, since Cazzu, her husband’s ex-partner, was aware of their relationship, before it was confirmed in the media.
YOU MAY BE INTERESTED: Joyce Carol Oates and JK Rowling star in affront in X
In the publication you can read:
Dulce María (Female Empowerment Figure) inspires us to reinvent ourselves, Bu Cuarón (Rising Star) to explore our creativity, Mabel Cadena (Change Maker) to work together to empower ourselves, Macarena García (Fashion Icon) to use our inner power, Galilea Montijo ( Revolutionary Beauty Icon) to recognize each of our achievements, St Vincent (Innovation in Music) to express ourselves through our art, the National Rhythmic Gymnastics Ensemble (Sports & Inspiration) to never give up and the Freedom Foundation (Social Activism Award) to fight for justice.
While the title for the wife of the Mariacheño was in the category Regional Music Awardfor helping us find our own voice, while Glamor México mentioned: “Today we celebrate the triumphs and lessons of each of our #WomenOfTheYear 2024!”
They launch a petition to remove the title of “Woman of the Year” from Ángela Aguilar
However, this recognition caused Internet users to react negatively, so they launched a petition on Change.org Mexico so that the magazine does not grant the appointment to Ángela Aguilar.
“Beegle has started a petition for Glamor magazine to reconsider Ángela Aguilar’s nomination as Woman of the Year 2024,” reads a post from the platform shared on its ‘X’ account.
According to the users’ argument, it is that, although the singer is “popular”, she does not deserve the title. However, they indicated that this measure is to encourage the media to use their platforms to “highlight the truly admirable women in our community.”
“Many of us consider that it is not a positive example for women in Mexico. We should not reward personalities simply for their fame, but for the significant contributions they make to our society,” the petition reads.
YOU MAY BE INTERESTED: Ernestina Sodi dies at 64; She was the sister of Thalía and Laura Zapata
Could Angela stop being Woman of the Year?
Given this commotion that arose on social networks after the appointment, which even led to a collection of signatures on Change.org Mexico, Glamor magazine on its social networks would have hidden the publication, which highlighted Nodal’s wife as one of the women selected to classify as “Woman of the Year”.
Related
Interview Between Time.news Editor and Celebrity Culture Expert
Time.news Editor: Welcome to our discussion today! We have a fascinating topic at hand, diving into the recent controversy surrounding Ángela Aguilar’s recognition as “Woman of the Year” by Glamour Magazine. Joining me is Dr. Sofia Martinez, an expert in celebrity culture and media studies. Dr. Martinez, thank you for being here!
Dr. Sofia Martinez: Thank you for having me! I’m excited to discuss this hot topic.
Editor: To start, could you provide some background on why Ángela Aguilar was awarded this title, and what the initial reactions were from the public?
Dr. Martinez: Certainly! Ángela Aguilar was included in Glamour Mexico’s list of “Women of the Year” for her contributions to regional music and her ability to inspire through her artistry. However, her recent comments regarding her relationship with Cazzu—specifically mentioning that Cazzu was aware of their relationship prior to it becoming public—sparked considerable uproar on social media. Many users felt her acknowledgment of the past relationship undermined the importance of women’s empowerment, which ultimately led to a petition calling for the revocation of her title.
Editor: It’s interesting how social media can ignite such movements. Can you elaborate on the nature of this petition and the motivations behind it?
Dr. Martinez: Absolutely. The petition was born out of a sentiment that felt Aguilar’s statements were insensitive, especially towards women who have experienced betrayal in similar situations. The public’s perception is heavily influenced by their personal values around relationships and trust. Many fans and activists believe that awarding her the title sends the wrong message about accountability and empathy in relationships, thereby triggering a backlash against the magazine’s choice.
Editor: That’s a compelling point. With the rise of social media activism, do you think this trend will continue to alter the way celebrities are recognized and honored in the future?
Dr. Martinez: Definitely. Social media empowers individuals to voice their opinions more than ever before. This immediate feedback loop means that celebrities are held accountable not just for their professional achievements but also for their personal actions and statements. It forces organizations like Glamour to reconsider who they recognize and why, as backlash can be swift and damaging to their reputation.
Editor: What implications do you think this has for the magazine industry as a whole? Are we seeing a shift in how awards and recognitions are approached?
Dr. Martinez: Yes, we are indeed witnessing a shift. There’s greater emphasis on aligning values with the honorees. Magazines might find themselves in a position where they need to assess not just our cultural appreciation for artists but also their personal narratives and how these narratives align with contemporary social values. This could lead to more comprehensive vetting processes before awarding titles in the future.
Editor: Lastly, how should celebrities approach this growing scrutiny of their public personas, especially young figures like Ángela Aguilar?
Dr. Martinez: Celebrities should engage in more conscious self-reflection and understand the ripple effects of their words and actions. In Aguilar’s case, being mindful of how personal relationships intertwine with public perceptions is vital. Engaging in dialogues with their followers and being transparent can help bridge the gap between celebrity culture and public expectations. Ultimately, being genuine and taking responsibility can resonate well with fans.
Editor: Thank you, Dr. Martinez. It’s clear that the landscape of celebrity recognition is evolving, and the dynamics at play are multifaceted. I appreciate your insights into this complex issue.
Dr. Martinez: Thank you! It’s been a pleasure discussing this timely and significant topic with you.
Editor: And thank you to our audience for tuning in. We’ll be sure to keep an eye on how these developments play out in the world of celebrity and media. Until next time!