Teh Dominican bishops have voiced their strong opposition to recent violent actions by Barrick Gold, a mining company, against local priests and communities, allegedly supported by the National Police and Army. In a statement released on January 9, the bishops condemned the aggression towards the Arroyo Vuelta community and surrounding areas in Cotuí, where residents protested the company’s plans to construct a tailings dam, threatening their homes and livelihoods. Highlighting the disproportionate use of force and human rights violations, the bishops called for an end to intimidation tactics and reaffirmed their commitment to defending the dignity and rights of the affected communities. They emphasized that profit should not come at the expense of the well-being of families in the region.
Interview: Voices from the Dominican Republic – The Bishop’s Stand Against Barrick Gold’s Actions
Editor, Time.news (TN): we are joined today by Dr. Mariana Castillo, a socio-environmental expert specializing in mining impacts and human rights. Dr. Castillo, the Dominican bishops recently issued a statement condemning Barrick Gold’s actions against local communities. Can you elaborate on the specific concerns raised by the bishops regarding Barrick Gold’s operations?
Dr. Castillo (DC): Absolutely. The bishops highlighted severe allegations of violence against members of the Arroyo Vuelta community in Cotuí. They condemned the involvement of the national Police and Army in supporting Barrick Gold during protests against the construction of a tailings dam. This dam poses significant risks not only to the habitat but also to the homes and livelihoods of local residents. The bishops underscored the need to prioritize the community’s well-being over corporate profits, stating, “profit should not come at the expense of the well-being of families in the region.”
TN: That’s a powerful statement. Considering the historical context, how have communities in the Dominican Republic responded to Barrick Gold’s operations in the past?
DC: Communities have consistently raised concerns about human rights violations linked to Barrick’s mining practices. Reports indicate that local residents have suffered from displacement, environmental degradation, and intimidation for voicing opposition to mining projects. Initiatives such as direct protests and community mobilization efforts have been common, reflecting a growing awareness and resistance against corporate actions that threaten their livelihoods and rights.Actually, a recent article elaborated on the sustained struggle of various communities against Barrick Gold, emphasizing the dire consequences of their operations on local water sources and land usage [1[1[1[1].
TN: What implications do the bishops’ statements and the ongoing protests have for Barrick Gold and the broader mining industry in the Dominican Republic?
DC: The bishops’ condemnation reflects deep societal dissent towards mining practices that compromise both human rights and environmental sustainability.For Barrick Gold, this could translate into increased reputational damage and potential regulatory scrutiny. As the industry faces mounting pressure globally to adhere to higher ethical standards, such incidents could inspire more rigorous policies to protect local communities and their resources. Additionally, the movement seen in the Dominican Republic echoes trends where communities worldwide are insisting on corporate accountability, leading to a shift in corporate social duty paradigms.
TN: Many of our readers are likely concerned about the human rights implications in such situations. What practical advice would you offer to individuals or groups looking to support affected communities?
DC: Individuals can assist by educating themselves on mining impacts and amplifying the voices of affected communities through social media and advocacy. Connecting with local NGOs that work on human rights and environmental issues in the Dominican Republic is critical. Additionally, supporting campaigns and petitions that demand corporate accountability can create significant pressure for change. Engaging with fair trade initiatives or responsibly sourced products also contributes to a more ethical industry standard. Ultimately, solidarity and informed activism can empower communities to advocate for their rights effectively.
TN: Thank you, Dr. Castillo, for shedding light on this crucial issue. The ongoing situation with Barrick Gold could serve as a catalyst for broader discussions surrounding corporate responsibility and human rights in the mining sector.
DC: Thank you for having me. It’s essential to continue these conversations,as the well-being of communities must always be prioritized in the face of industrial advancement.