2023-12-13 01:26:35
In the current context of global geopolitical tensions, multipolarity versus unipolarity emerges as a central theme in the philosopher’s analysis Alexander Dugin. This vision focuses on different conflict fronts around the world, where power dynamics between nations and regional blocs reflect a struggle between a world order dominated by a single pole, associated with Western and American influence, and a multipolar system which seeks to affirm the autonomy and cultural and political identity of the different regions.
The Russian philosopher identifies five key areas of this global confrontation, each with its specificities and challenges.
Dugin: “British Guiana-Essequibo (along with the Malvinas) is another front of multipolarity versus unipolarity. Overall we are dealing with five potential or actual fronts:
Vladimir Putin’s recent triumphal visit to the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia, followed by long negotiations with Iranian President Raisi, demonstrates how seriously Russia takes multipolarity. Especially on the eve of 2024, when Russia enters its annual BRICS presidency.
By the end of the year — this time in Latin America — a new sign of multipolarity emerged. Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro declared his country’s rights to the territory of British Guiana. Maxim Medovarov, in his Telegram channel Notes of a Traditionalist, rightly points out that Guyana itself was a product of the evil genius of Atlanticism, Lord Palmerston, who planned and carried out the ‘cutting into pieces of Greater Colombia with the death of Bolivar, including the Essequibo cut to British Guiana (Guyana)’. British Guiana-Essequibo (together with the Malvinas [Isole Falkland]) is another front of multipolarity against unipolarity.
Overall, we are dealing with five potential or actual fronts:
Russia is at war with the collective West and American (Anglo-Saxon) globalism in Ukraine. Essentially, this is a civil war of the Russians – imperial Russians against Atlanticist Russians who have betrayed their Russian identity, but the Atlanticist “Russians” are being used by the unipolar forces of the West. The Islamic world is consolidating (with serious delay) against Israel, which is carrying out a systematic genocide of the Arab population. At the same time, the unipolar West is again on Israel’s side (as its proxy in the Middle East). The bloc of anti-colonial West African countries (Mali, Burkina Faso, Niger, Central African Republic, Gabon) is united against pro-colonial (Atlantic) regimes and against Macron’s globalist France. Here too, open conflict can break out at any moment. Taiwan’s potential front against mainland China is perhaps what interests the United States most. (And here a direct conflict awaits in the wings). Venezuela’s declaration of rights on Essequibo, an artificial colonial formation of the Atlanticists. This is also connected to the issue of the Malvinas, which could become more acute after the dismissal of the degenerate who came to power (this is what happens if revolutionary Peronism intersects with liberalism, as Sergio Masa did, who lost).
India (Bharat) occupies a special place in the multipolar heptarchy. It is a completely independent civilization-state, strategically closer to the United States (due to conflict with China and Pakistan and the broader Islamic factor).
At the same time, India is friends with Russia, Africa and Latin America. There are no zones of direct conflict with the globalists (except for the memory of the monstrous era of British colonization).
Previously, the West supported radical Islam and Pakistan, and although this has partly remained, it is no longer so pronounced: India is needed by the globalists to deal with China.
Atlanticists and supporters of a unipolar world understand this perfectly. Thus, already in April 2022, Liz Truss, at the time Foreign Minister of Great Britain, spoke of the ‘return of geopolitics’. More recently, Truss, as former Prime Minister of England, on her tour of the United States, tried to persuade Republicans to support an Atlanticist approach by financing Kiev’s ongoing conflict with Russia. In this context, you emphasized that the conflicts in Ukraine, Israel and Taiwan, although seemingly separate, are actually facets of the same overall war.
This is a correct geopolitical vision of things. The tension in West Africa and in Essequibo are also fronts in the same war.
The global geopolitical landscape is currently divided into a heptarchy composed of seven major entities: the West, Russia, China, India, the Islamic world, Africa and Latin America. This divide is mostly along a single fault line, with the West on one side and the other six on the opposite. The globalists themselves clearly and distinctly understand this. In their eyes, there is only one pole, the West itself. The rest should be his vassals (not sovereign poles) and fight among themselves and not the West.
The structure of the global confrontation of six against one is also clearly understood in Russia. In his article ‘2024: the Year of Geopolitical Awakening’ in the magazine Разведчик (Scout), the head of Russia’s foreign intelligence service (SVR), Sergei Naryshkin, states:
“Next year on the world stage will pass under the sign of a further intensification of the opposition between the two above-mentioned geopolitical principles: Anglo-Saxon, or insular, ‘divide and conquer’, and directly antagonistic to it, continental ‘unite and lead’ . The manifestations of this fierce opposition in the coming year will be observed in all, even the most remote, regions of the world: from the post-Soviet space — most significant for us — to Latin America and the Pacific Ocean.
So, we must ‘unite and lead’ (including unite and lead the Eurasian territories — especially the traitorous Ukraine). And the enemy will continue to seek to ‘divide and rule’, seeking to sow discord between the poles of the heptarchy — the six emerging ‘worlds’: Russian, Chinese, Islamic, Indian, African and Latin American. The enemies want there to be only one world: theirs. The existence of other worlds, other than the Western one, they reject and demonize — especially the Russian world. We must clearly understand this and realize that the five fronts of the struggle against the unipolar world order and Western hegemony are all fronts of our war.
—Alexander Dugin
#Dugin #time #multipolarity #unipolarity #News