The Disputed Electoral Tribunal (TCE) of Ecuador has upheld the appeals against the candidacy of January topicwith which the security specialist entrepreneur he was excluded from the February 2025 electoral process. The TCE judges concluded this There is an alleged conflict of interest considering that Topic has contracts with state institutionshe pointed to the Primicias portal, underlining that, despite having sold shares in three companies (Telconet, Consorcio Tránsito Seguro and Megadatos), which have contracts with the State, he holds “effective control” of these companies and is the “final beneficiary” .
Topic presented his candidacy to Michelle Calvache as vice-presidential candidate before the National Electoral Council (CNE), organizer of the elections, but the political party Patriotic Society and the Pachakutik movement opposed it, citing a conflict of interest which he denies. “Today, unfortunately, we had a judge, one, who fought for the democracy of the country. We salute this judge, a patriot. Unfortunately, the others, as the patriotic judge said, allowed themselves to be carried away by hidden interests,” Topic he told followers who accompanied him out of TCE, where they listened to the session live.
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
The businessman announced Monday that he will open a website so that citizens can nominate and elect the person who will replace him in the presidential candidacy.. According to Guillermo Celi, leader of the SUMA movement that supports Topic, a new application can be submitted until next Sunday, after having presented an appeal for clarification and extension of the TCE decision and having informed the CNE.
Based on what were still rumours, Topic had declared on social media on Saturday that, in the event of disqualification, he would appear before the Organization of American States (OAS), with whose general secretary, Luis Almagro, he had already met last year. October in Washington, where he explained the situation to him. Almagro underlined that “in the face of the unofficial versions of the disqualification” of the candidate, it is believed “that, if it were to become effective, it would constitute a serious blow to the integrity of the current electoral process and a serious step backwards for Ecuadorian democracy”. .” The Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Human Mobility of Ecuador reminded Almagro of the principle of non-interference in the internal affairs of the State.
Topic, a 41-year-old former sniper and paratrooper, reported in October that he had received “death threats” over his candidacy. The right wing is aiming for the presidency for the second time after finishing fourth, with 14% of valid votes, in the 2023 elections, won by current president Daniel Noboa. Although distant, two private polls taken last August placed Topic in third place, behind Noboa and runner Luisa González. The latter two contested the run-off for the 2023 early elections.
Interview between the Time.news Editor and Political Analyst Dr. Lucia Martinez
Editor: Good morning, Dr. Martinez, and thank you for joining us today to discuss the recent developments surrounding the electoral candidacy of January Topic in Ecuador.
Dr. Martinez: Good morning! Thank you for having me. It’s an important topic, especially in light of the upcoming elections.
Editor: Let’s dive right in. The Electoral Tribunal of Ecuador has upheld the appeals against Topic’s candidacy, citing an alleged conflict of interest due to his connections with state institutions. Can you explain why this is such a critical issue in Ecuadorian politics?
Dr. Martinez: Absolutely. Conflict of interest in politics is always a serious concern, especially in a country like Ecuador, where trust in political figures and institutions has been historically fragile. Topic’s prior ownership of stakes in companies with government contracts raises questions about whether his interests align with the public’s best interests. This could potentially undermine the integrity of the electoral process.
Editor: You mentioned public trust. Do you think Topic’s exclusion will affect voters’ perceptions of the electoral system?
Dr. Martinez: Definitely. Public perception plays a vital role in democratic processes. When candidates with controversial backgrounds are excluded, it can strengthen trust in the system, but the opposite holds - a sense of disillusionment can arise if the process seems biased. It’s essential for the authorities to transparently communicate the reasons behind these decisions to maintain public confidence.
Editor: Topic himself denies any conflict of interest, stating that he sold shares in the implicated companies but still retains effective control over them. How do you view this defense?
Dr. Martinez: It raises a complex issue. Selling shares does not automatically eliminate potential conflicts, particularly if he remains the “final beneficiary.” The line between legitimate business interests and political ambitions can often blur, and this creates skepticism among the electorate. His defense will need to be scrutinized critically by both the tribunal and the public.
Editor: Moreover, political opposition has rallied against his candidacy, reinforcing the notion of conflict of interest. How significant is this opposition in shaping Ecuador’s political landscape?
Dr. Martinez: The opposition’s efforts highlight the contentious nature of Ecuadorian politics, where parties like the Patriotic Society and the Pachakutik Movement are keen to maintain a level of scrutiny over candidates. Their stance reflects broader concerns about governance, accountability, and public service ethics in a country struggling with corruption issues. It also signals to voters about which parties are proactively working to ensure a fair electoral process.
Editor: Topic has announced plans to open a website for citizens to nominate someone to replace him. What impact do you think this initiative could have?
Dr. Martinez: This could be a double-edged sword. On one hand, it seems to demonstrate a commitment to democracy and citizen engagement, allowing voters a voice in leadership. On the other hand, if perceived as a move to sidestep transparency around his own candidacy, it may backfire. Ultimately, the electorate will be the judge, and how this initiative is received will depend heavily on the unfolding political dynamics and public sentiment.
Editor: Thank you, Dr. Martinez, for your insights. It’s clear that the implications of these developments will resonate beyond the current electoral cycle and shape Ecuador’s political landscape for years to come.
Dr. Martinez: Thank you for having me. It’s an important moment for Ecuadorian democracy, and I look forward to seeing how it unfolds.