A group of eight ministers of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation (SCJN) will resign from his positionseffective August 31, 2025, to preserve your lifetime retirement.
According to sources consulted, the majority of members of the High Court would abide by the seventh transitional period of the judicial reformvalid since last September 16.
You may be interested in: Morenistas willing to assume sanctions in reference to the use of land in Bosque de Chapultepec
The Constitution requires them that when they present their decline to participate in the election for their 2025 positions, they must resign and stay to work until the end of August of next year, if they wish to preserve their retirement assets.
“The ministers of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation who conclude their position due to not running or not having been elected in the extraordinary election of 2025, will not be beneficiaries of a retirement benefit, except when they present their resignation from the position. before the closing date of the call indicated in section I of article 96 of this Decree, which will take effect on August 31, 2025; In these cases, the retirement amount will be proportional to the time of their performance.” indicates judicial reform.
In turn, Minister Juan Luis Alcántara presented today a proposed sentence that seeks to partially annul the judicial reform and leave the election of ministers of the SCJN untouched, so his decline and resignation is an essential requirement to preserve his lifelong retirement. .
Ministers Loretta Ortiz, Yasmín Esquivel and Lenia Batres have publicly expressed their desire to compete in the next election, so if their decision is confirmed, they would have a direct pass to the ballot and would not have to resign.
This Tuesday is the deadline for ministers to inform the Senate if they decline or participate in the 2025 judicial election and November 24 is the deadline for them to present their resignation with effect from August 2025.
The information is that eight ministers would abide by these precepts of the judicial reform and would present their resignation, thereby guaranteeing their retirement benefits.
A separate case is that of Minister Luis María Aguilar Morales, who ends his term in the Court on November 30, but the reform indicates that those who finish their position before the close of the call will not receive retirement benefits.
The benefit of receiving a retirement “It will not be applicable to ministers in office upon the entry into force of this Decree whose original appointment concludes before the closing date of the respective call, in which case they will comply with the terms of this Decree.”
The appointment of Minister Aguilar Morales ends on November 30, six days after the closing of registration of candidates for the Court, so the judicial reform and its secondary laws left that void to determine what happened to the ministers who conclude their duties in a few days. after the closing of the call.
Related
Time.news Editor: Good morning, and thank you for joining us today. We have a very important topic to discuss regarding recent developments within the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation (SCJN). Here to provide insights is legal expert Dr. Ana Maria Salazar. Welcome, Dr. Salazar!
Dr. Ana Maria Salazar: Good morning! Thank you for having me.
Editor: Let’s dive right in. It seems that a group of eight ministers from the SCJN have decided to resign from their positions by August 31, 2025, due to the implications of the judicial reform. Can you explain the rationale behind this decision?
Dr. Salazar: Absolutely. The primary reason these ministers are resigning is to secure their lifetime retirement benefits. The recent judicial reform, which came into effect last September, stipulates that if they do not participate in the upcoming elections for new positions in 2025, they risk losing their retirement benefits entirely. This creates a challenging situation for the ministers as they weigh their options.
Editor: That sounds like a precarious position. What exactly does the judicial reform state about retirement benefits for these ministers?
Dr. Salazar: The reform clearly states that ministers who complete their term without running for reelection will not qualify for their retirement benefits unless they formally resign before a certain deadline. The calculations of their retirement benefits will be proportional to their time served, but only if they resign by the specified date of August 31, 2025.
Editor: Now, Minister Juan Luis Alcántara has proposed a sentence that seeks to partially annul this reform. What are the implications of this proposal?
Dr. Salazar: Effectively, Alcántara’s proposal could challenge the legitimacy of the reform itself. If successful, it could mean that the upcoming elections and the conditions surrounding their resignations may not hold, thereby allowing the ministers to keep their positions while still retaining their benefits. It’s a significant move, and it highlights divisions within the court regarding this reform.
Editor: Those divisions could lead to major shifts in the judicial landscape. It’s worth noting that two prominent ministers, Loretta Ortiz and Yasmín Esquivel, are also mentioned in connection with this situation. What can you tell us about their roles in this context?
Dr. Salazar: Both ministers are influential figures in the SCJN, and their decisions will be closely monitored. If they choose to resign, it could set a precedent for the others. Their respective positions and public standing might influence their peers, shaping how the entire court navigates this complicated environment created by the reforms.
Editor: Given the approaching deadline and the serious implications of these resignations, what do you believe will happen in the final months leading up to August 2025?
Dr. Salazar: I anticipate a lot of negotiations and potentially intense discussions within the court. Some ministers may feel pressured to resign to secure their benefits, while others might dig in their heels in hopes of altering the reform or staving off premature exits. Public pressure and broader political implications will also likely play a role, especially as these issues become more widely debated.
Editor: Thank you, Dr. Salazar, for sharing your insights on this crucial matter. The decisions that will unfold in the coming months could have lasting effects on the judicial system. We appreciate your expertise.
Dr. Salazar: Thank you for the opportunity to discuss this important issue!
Editor: And thank you to our audience for joining us. Stay tuned for more updates on this evolving story.