Chennai: Opposition leader Palanichamy has said that the Vanniyar reservation law was repealed because the government failed to provide proper data to the court. துரைமுருகன் Strongly condemned.
In his statement, he said, “Today’s opposition leader Palanisamy, who led the AIADMK regime, halved the decision of the High Court to go 10.5 per cent to the Supreme Court for the 10.5 per cent internal reservation given to the Vanni. The law has been repealed. ”
அ.தி.மு.க. The Dravida Munnetra Kazhaka government, with its senior lawyers, put forward all sorts of arguments in the High Court and the Supreme Court to uphold the internal reservation given to the Vanni community despite the law that brought it to power. Which senior lawyers argued is included in the judgment itself. Even then, the former law minister, C.V. Shanmugam does not know,
Palanisamy, who is the leader of the opposition, did not understand either. The fact is that Edappadi Palanisamy and Shanmugam are betraying the Vanni community by glorifying the legal battle waged by our party leader and Tamil Nadu Chief Minister MK Stalin to secure the 10.5 per cent reservation given to the Vanni community.
If Shanmugam reads after fainting the three reasons cited in paragraph 77 of the Supreme Court judgment as “The Govt has Committed Error”, the AIADMK has made that mistake. The rule is that the “government” referred to in the judgment is the AIADMK. Government is also known.
This “internal reservation” debate was held in 2012 at the Tamil Nadu Backward Classes Commission. That was the rule of Jayalalithaa. When it was suggested that internal reservation should be given in that commission, 6 out of 7 members (including the chairman) in the commission opposed it, whose rule is it? அ.தி.மு.க. Rule. What did those 6 people say and oppose? “How can you recommend without giving us caste-based statistics?” Then in response to that question – who slept without getting a recommendation unanimously with the relevant data from the Tamil Nadu Backward Classes Commission – whose rule left the fort? அ.தி.மு.க. Rule. For the sole reason that parliamentary elections are coming – the AIADMK hastily received the report without receiving a unanimous recommendation. Is there no rule?
This report of the Tamil Nadu Backward Classes Commission was given on 24 May 2012. Whose rule had put that recommendation on hold for 8 years. That too is the AIADMK. Rule. Can they cover this up or not? The regime is not going to happen ”? Whose rule is it that the Tamil Nadu Backward Classes Commission was immediately paralyzed and reorganized in 2020? Palanisamy – CV Shanmugam bargained for everything in “Guwahati”; It was the AIADMK regime that carried out the koothu.
Who has paralyzed the Backward Classes Commission for 8 years and, half-heartedly, by the time the 2021 Assembly elections came and passed an internal quota law by spraying it with urgency, has brought that society to this point of crisis today? Edappadi Palanisamy does not mentally agree with the reservation given to this Vanniyar community. Similarly, as the Law Minister, CV Shanmugam was never interested in formalizing the Vanniyar community reservation. The duo should therefore issue a public apology for their negligence in taking the reservation issue of the Vanni community to the Supreme Court.
As early as 2012, when members of the Backward Classes Commission protested against the need for “caste-wise statistics” – the AIADMK regime had not made any effort for eight years. The one who was the law minister in it is the one who is now smirking when he gets the “mic”. It was Edappadi Palanisamy who, at the time of leaving power, set up and confusing both the “law to give internal reservation on the one hand” and the “Justice Kulasekara Commission to gather information on the basis of caste” on the other. Who prevented the immediate appointment of this Justice Kulasekara Commission in 2012- was Shanmugam in the AIADMK then or was he in the Andaman Islands? Edappadi Palanisamy became the Chief Minister in 2017. What was he doing from then until 2020? Could the interest shown in the collection have been shown in this reservation issue of the Vanni community?
Dr. Ramdas, the founder of the Proletarian People’s Party, and the BJP, which has been arguing in the High Court and the Supreme Court, are currently in the emergency working group on the Supreme Court verdict. Advocate Balu has spoken very clearly in the High Court and the Supreme Court on how the Government of Tamil Nadu – especially the DMK leader – has worked to secure this reservation. That is why Palanisamy, who remained silent till yesterday, is not tolerated today. Go burn in the fire of jealousy DMK rule Blames on. He puts forward a false accusation against the DMK that his mistake has been skinned in the Supreme Court.
The apex court has now ruled that 6 out of the 7 comments made by the High Court against this internal reservation are incorrect, despite the mistakes made by the AIADMK regime in the reservation issue and the legal battle to protect the welfare of the Vanni community. It e.g. The victory of the Stalin-led regime’s efficient legal struggle. But during the AIADMK regime, mistakes made in obtaining nominations with proper data from the Tamil Nadu Backward Classes Commission, negligence on the part of a “helpful” law minister like Shanmugam and Edappadi Palanisamy’s reservation for the election as a “no-brainer” led to this community’s unfortunate verdict. That fact must be taken into account. “