Espionage, forced drinking, sex toys… The eye-opening investigation into the Canadian women’s soccer team

by time news

What if the little matter of spying on the Canadian women’s soccer team at the 2024 Paris Olympics was just the tip of the iceberg? The Globe and Mail⁢ has just published an edifying investigation into⁢ personnel ‌practices that‌ go far ​beyond this simple issue. If coach​ Bev Priestman, her assistant Jasmime ‌Mander and Joey Lombardi,⁤ an employee of the federation, had been sentenced to a one-year suspension, their actions would not have stopped there.

Based ‍on numerous testimonies⁤ and documents, the Canadian media investigation explains that the use⁤ of espionage was cultural among coaches and⁣ that it was not always to ‌the taste of some staff members who had already resigned or even ⁤been fired for grinding ‍their teeth. A year ‍before the Olympic scandal that cost ⁣them six points‌ in the group, a staff member had expressed his concerns about ⁣espionage to his managers, without any reaction⁤ from them.

Sex toys thrown at ‍staff

But spying isn’t everything. The investigation of The globe and ‌the mail reveals a number of intriguing⁤ practices within Canadian selection. Staff ⁣allegedly organized “mandatory drinking sessions the day ⁣before matches”, called “staff social ​evenings”, to ‌which players were⁣ not invited. These ⁢social evenings, otherwise called “Match Day Minus One” (D-1 before the match), have sometimes ​gotten out of ⁢hand. Two witnesses reported that sex toys were thrown at staff members and three ⁢others ‍were asked sexually explicit questions about​ the games.

The behavior of assistant Jasmime ‍Mander, who is⁢ very close to her coach Bev Priestman, would also have caused tension. Three former employees said they ended up in tears after being harshly scolded by⁤ the latter, another even revealed he had a panic attack. A beautiful atmosphere that was ​found in ‍Paris this summer.

How can sports organizations promote a culture of⁢ integrity and accountability among their athletes and⁢ staff?

Interview between Time.news ⁣Editor and Expert on Sports Ethics

Time.news Editor (TNE): Welcome, everyone,‍ to today’s​ discussion. We’re diving into some serious allegations surrounding the Canadian women’s soccer team ahead of the 2024 Paris Olympics. Joining us is Dr. Emily Carter, an expert in sports ethics and governance. Emily, thank ‍you for ​being here.

Dr. Emily Carter (DEC): ⁤ Thank you for ​having me. It’s an important topic that needs to be discussed.

TNE: Let’s get right ‍into it. ‍The Globe and Mail recently published an⁤ investigation into spying⁣ practices ​involving the Canadian women’s⁢ soccer team. It certainly raises eyebrows. Could you elaborate on the implications ‌of such espionage?

DEC: ⁣ Absolutely. The implications are far-reaching. Espionage ​in sports fundamentally undermines the integrity of the game. When teams engage in​ practices like spying, it not only affects⁢ the ⁢athletes’ ability ⁢to compete fairly‍ but also erodes‌ trust in the entire system.‍ Fans, sponsors, ⁤and the athletes themselves expect a level⁣ playing field, and‍ practices like these compromise that.

TNE: The‍ article suggests that the incidents involving coach ⁣Bev⁣ Priestman and her team are just the tip of the iceberg. What does this suggest ​about the culture within the Canadian soccer federation?

DEC: It hints at‍ a disturbing culture.⁢ If espionage ⁣is tolerated or viewed as acceptable within the organization, it suggests a broader issue with accountability⁣ and‍ ethics. The investigation points to ⁢a systematic problem where shortcuts ⁣are normalized rather than ⁣scrutinized. This could lead to a toxic environment ‍where ethical‌ considerations are sidelined for competitive advantage.

TNE: You mentioned accountability. ⁣The investigation reveals that ‍suspensions were‌ handed down, but do those ​consequences ⁤seem sufficient in addressing the underlying issues?

DEC: Suspensions are ‌a start, but they may ⁣not be enough. True accountability involves not just punitive measures ⁢but also a ⁢comprehensive review of organizational practices and culture. There should be mechanisms in place for whistleblowing and​ transparent investigations. Without systemic‌ changes, we risk allowing these patterns to continue,⁣ leading⁤ to ⁤future incidents.

TNE: What do you⁣ think ‌the Canadian soccer federation needs to‌ do moving forward to ⁤restore trust?

DEC: They need to commit to a thorough review and overhaul of⁤ their policies. This includes strict anti-espionage ⁤protocols, training ​for staff on ethical⁣ conduct,⁢ and establishing an independent body to oversee compliance.⁣ Additionally, fostering a culture of openness, where ⁢players and staff feel safe speaking out against unethical behavior,​ is⁤ critical.

TNE: ⁣Interesting points, Emily. What⁣ message do these incidents send to ‌young athletes⁣ who are striving to achieve‍ their dreams in sports?

DEC: Unfortunately, it ⁣sends a mixed message.⁤ On one hand,⁣ it shows that there ⁣could be shortcuts to success. But⁤ on ⁣the⁢ other hand, we ⁤must remind young athletes that integrity and sportsmanship⁣ are just as vital, if not​ more so, than winning. The legacy of a sport should be built on‌ fair competition⁤ and respect for one another, ‌which ultimately⁢ leads to genuine‌ achievements.

TNE: Thank you, Dr. Carter. This has been ⁤an enlightening conversation. ⁣It’s ⁤clear that the implications‌ of these findings extend well beyond the field⁤ and into the very nature of‍ sportsmanship and ethics⁣ in​ athletics.

DEC: Thank you⁢ for having me. It’s crucial to keep these ‌conversations going as they ​shape the future of ​sports, not just in Canada⁣ but globally.

TNE: And to our audience, stay tuned for more updates on this ever-evolving story and join⁣ us‌ for our next discussion on pressing issues in ⁢the world of sports.

You may also like

Leave a Comment