Miguel Díaz-Canel, president of Cuba, has been at the center of a series of stories about his personal life that highlight his history of romantic relationships, largely linked to his political rise. Since his youth in Los Camilitos, he has been described as a charismatic figure with a notable capacity for attraction that was reflected in his various relationships.
This is how he makes it known The Watcher of Cuba in an article where he reveals that, according to canelistic legend, his first known love is the journalist Minoska Cadalzo.
After Cadalzo, Miguel Díaz-Canel married Marta Villanueva, with whom he had two children. Then came another that I met, Roxana Donato, and later came the journalist Fabiola López, whose closeness with Canel aroused suspicions in her husband, a soldier named René, and who did not have the berocos that Laidy Fernández de Juan de Juan’s husband had. At least pretend to grab a gun to go discuss it. If you want to find out about that other gossip, you should have seen Alex Otaola’s program where he talked about it.
His departure or sending to work in Holguín put him between the legs of the very expert Lis Cuesta, who would become his wife after a time of relationships and rumors and after having left the rector of the University where he studied.
The bad tongues, the good ones and that of Juan Juan Almeida, say and assure that Lis jumped from the window; and that she took so much seminal fluid from Canel that he forgot all his previous love experiences and decided to marry her.
However, that does not mean that he was faithful to him all his life; as much as she was not faithful to him either.
What is known is that in Havana, when he was Minister of Education, the rectors Saborido and Cruz told me at some point, he slept with secretaries and university students. I personally met one of them, blonde and green-eyed, with a very good body, who later ended up being a secretary at ENATES, back on Ave. del Bosque in Nuevo Vedado. Number 36, if I remember correctly.
During those years he was tied with Livia Reyes, who was director of the Information Center for the press and who, to be honest, must have been or is, the greatest cannon that Díaz-Canel had in a bed, discounting those who, for the age difference, they surpassed it in freshness, energy and carefreeness.
El Vigía mentions Leticia Martínez Hernández. The truth is, and I assure you, that there has been nothing more than paternal affection between them. Many claim that the chemistry between the two is evident and Canel should not care in the least that she is married to a State Security snitch.
Despite the speculation in this last case and the certainty of the refocile in the previous ones, the truth is that Díaz-Canel is neither faithful nor honest. His love affairs confirm this, those that began once, a long time ago, when he was barely 13 years old in the bed of “La Muda”, who no matter how hard he tried, I don’t remember if her name was Madeleine or Madelaine or Madelín.
note: Sergio Prado was born in Villa Clara and studied with Díaz-Canel in high school.
Time.news Interview with Dr. Ana Pérez, Political Sociologist
Time.news Editor: Good afternoon, Dr. Pérez. Thank you for joining us today to discuss recent revelations about Miguel Díaz-Canel’s personal life and how they intertwine with his political career.
Dr. Ana Pérez: Good afternoon! It’s my pleasure to be here to discuss such an intriguing topic.
Time.news Editor: To begin, can you elaborate on how Díaz-Canel’s personal relationships have influenced his political trajectory, particularly in the context of Cuban society?
Dr. Ana Pérez: Absolutely. In Cuba, as in many cultures, personal relationships can significantly influence one’s political standing. Díaz-Canel’s early romantic connections, such as his bond with journalist Minoska Cadalzo, not only highlighted his charm and charisma but also helped him forge important alliances within the media. This allowed him to gain public visibility and political leverage, which is crucial in a tightly controlled political environment.
Time.news Editor: Interesting. So, would you say that his marriages and romantic entanglements served a strategic purpose in enhancing his political ascent?
Dr. Ana Pérez: Yes, to some extent. Marrying Marta Villanueva, with whom he has two children, established him as a family man—a crucial image in the eyes of the electorate. Relationships like those with Fabiola López or Lis Cuesta showcased a more complex, perhaps human side of him, potentially making him more relatable to the populace. However, such relationships also come with scrutiny and gossip, which can positively or negatively impact a politician’s image.
Time.news Editor: Gossip seems to play a significant role in how public figures are perceived. How do you think the media coverage surrounding his relationships—especially the so-called “canelistic legend”—affects public opinion?
Dr. Ana Pérez: The media plays a dual role here. While it can amplify scandals and rumors, leading to a potentially negative perception, it can also serve to humanize a politician. The fascination with Díaz-Canel’s romantic life may distract the public from pressing political issues, allowing him to maintain a degree of political capital. However, if the scandals suggest infidelity or exploitation, it could erode trust in his leadership, especially among more traditional constituents.
Time.news Editor: You mentioned the impact of rumors—like the one alleging Lis Cuesta “jumping out the window.” What does this say about the intersection of rumor and political reality in Cuba?
Dr. Ana Pérez: Such rumors reflect the deep-rooted conspiracy theories and distrust that often permeate Cuban society, especially when it comes to leadership. They fuel public curiosity and speculation but can also underscore instability. In a political context where transparency is often lacking, such rumors might stand in for a form of social discourse—people discuss what they can’t see happening in the political sphere.
Time.news Editor: With societal norms in mind, do you think Díaz-Canel’s romantic history will haunt him politically, or could it bolster his efforts to portray himself as a relatable figure?
Dr. Ana Pérez: It really depends on how the narrative unfolds moving forward. If he addresses these rumors with transparency—perhaps even humor—it could help humanize him further and endear him to the populace. Conversely, if more damaging allegations arise or if he is perceived as hypocritical, it could seriously undermine his authority. Ultimately, he will need to navigate this landscape carefully.
Time.news Editor: Thank you, Dr. Pérez, for sharing your insights on this fascinating aspect of Miguel Díaz-Canel’s life and career. Your perspectives really highlight the interplay between personal and political realms in Cuba.
Dr. Ana Pérez: Thank you for having me! It’s a pleasure to discuss the nuances of politics and personal life, especially in a context as layered as Cuba’s.