For NATO, the challenge of intervening in Ukraine without going to war

by time news

In times of war, 1 billion euros is quickly spent. That’s the amount of additional military aid to Ukraine that Germany announced on April 15, perhaps softening criticism of the country for not sending tanks.

This financial envelope is part of the promises of several countries, which have undertaken to provide heavy armaments. Two days earlier, the United States pledged additional aid of $800 million [740 millions d’euros], including helicopters and armored personnel carriers. The UK is sending armored patrol vehicles and anti-ship missiles, and the Czech Republic has already delivered mobile rocket launchers and T-72 tanks from its Soviet-era stockpiles. Slovakia, which has already sent Ukraine an S-300 anti-aircraft system, said it may add MiG-29 fighter jets, a Soviet model that Ukrainian pilots are already familiar with.

Material aid or war efforts?

In early March, the United States refused a comparable offer from Poland, which wanted to supply MiG-29s, for fear that it would provoke Russian reprisals and then drag NATO into the war. Emmanuel Macron was all the more explicit: according to him, if heavy weapons were sent, Russia could qualify NATO as “co-belligerent”, that is to say, party to the conflict and therefore a legitimate target under the laws of war. The United States now states that it has no objection to the Slovak proposal.

At the very beginning of the conflict, Ukraine’s allies mainly contented themselves with delivering small arms and portable anti-tank and anti-aircraft missiles. It is certain now that the war will drag on forever, which is why these allies are now ready to provide complex equipment that requires months of training. Russian war crimes have also convinced them to deliver the heavy armaments that Ukraine needs to regain control of the occupied territories.

Still, the switch to heavier weapons is a source of angst for some, notably in Germany, which backtracked on its offer to supply Marder infantry fighting vehicles after its ministry

The following is reserved for subscribers…

  • Access all subscribed content
  • Support independent writing
  • Receive the Mail Alarm Clock every morning

Discover all our offers

Source of the article

The Economist (London)

Great institution of the British press, The Economist, founded in 1843 by a Scottish hatter, is the bible for anyone interested in international affairs. Openly liberal, he generally defends free trade, globalization, immigration and cultural liberalism. It is printed in six countries, and 85% of its sales are outside the UK.
None of the articles are signed: a long-standing tradition that the weekly supports with the idea that “personality and the collective voice matter more than the individual identity of journalists”.
On the site of The Economist, in addition to the main articles of the journal, there are excellent thematic and geographical files produced by The Economist Intelligence Unit, as well as multimedia content, blogs and the calendar of conferences organized by the journal throughout the world. As a bonus: the regular update of the main stock market prices.
The magazine cover may vary between editions (UK, Europe, North America, Asia), but the content is the same; in the UK, however, a few extra pages deal with national news.
The Economist 43.4% belongs to the Italian Agnelli family, with the rest of the capital being shared between major British families (Cadbury, Rothschild, Schroders, etc.) and members of the editorial staff.

Read more

Nos services

You may also like

Leave a Comment