Former Attorney General Avichai Mandelblit Criticizes Proposed Law to Reduce Probable Cause
Former Attorney General Avichai Mandelblit has strongly criticized a proposed law that aims to reduce the probable cause requirement for certain legal proceedings. In an interview with “The Central Edition,” Mandelblit argued that this legislation would transform Israel into a dictatorial border state.
Mandelblit expressed his concern about the proposal to politicize the committee responsible for appointing judges and the subsequent prohibition to abolish basic laws and reasonableness. He warned that if these measures are passed, the country’s government and democratic system would be irreparably harmed.
Speaking about the legislative process, Mandelblit emphasized the dramatic nature of the proposed changes. He pointed out that the removal of reasonableness as a key working tool for the Supreme Court and the government’s legal advisors would have significant consequences.
Furthermore, Mandelblit highlighted the importance of the courts’ independence, as it is the cornerstone of Israel’s democracy. He argued that without a constitution or a charter of human rights, the founders of Israel placed great importance on preserving the independence and integrity of the judicial system.
Regarding the possible appointment of judges and the control and supervision mechanisms, Mandelblit criticized the proposed legislation as allowing political appointments without checks and balances. He suggested that instead of discussing the total removal of reasonableness, there should be a serious conversation about specific policy changes.
When asked about the possible firing of the ombudsman, Mandelblit stressed that it was not necessary to dismiss the individual in question. He proposed the removal of the ombudsman’s criminal powers and the appointment of a criminal prosecutor on their behalf instead. Mandelblit argued that this arrangement would address concerns about reasonableness while ensuring that specific cases would be handled appropriately.
Mandelblit also briefly mentioned the ongoing trial of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu without delving into specific details. He emphasized that the court should decide the outcome of the trial but highlighted the importance of managing state affairs in the meantime to avoid conflicts of interest.
In relation to the criminal case known as case 4000, Mandelblit stated that such matters should be resolved in court. He declined to comment on the specific indictment but stressed that threatening the general prosecutor responsible for the case is unacceptable.
Lastly, Mandelblit disclosed previous discussions he had with Netanyahu and his defense attorneys regarding a possible plea deal. While acknowledging the potential for a plea agreement in any trial, including Netanyahu’s, Mandelblit made it clear that the case must be conducted until its conclusion in court.
Overall, Mandelblit’s remarks highlight his concerns about the proposed legislation and express his commitment to upholding the integrity and independence of the legal system in Israel.