France – New Zealand (30-29): and at the end of the suspense, the Blues overturn the Stade de France

by Laura Richards – Editor-in-Chief

An ‌audience that melts. Effusions. Everything ended on a thread ⁤but⁤ on the right side. At the cost of a ​ferocious defense, the Blues maintained their success this Saturday evening ‍in Saint-Denis against the New Zealanders who for a moment believed they were superior. By one point ⁢(30-29), the Tricolores proved it wrong.

The bright haka, glittering under‍ the⁤ spotlight, was however faded like an ‌omen under an almost full ⁣moon. These white-shirted ​All Blacks faced the Blues⁤ head-on for the first⁤ time. More toned,⁢ sharper, they also dominated the static phases. More ​powerful ⁢in ⁢the fray,‌ better coordinated in action, the Pacific players immediately take charge of the match,‌ leaving only⁤ a ⁣few crumbs ⁣to the Tricolores ‌who above all repel ‍the most pressing.

The ⁤opponent didn’t do too many frills ‍either, playing close to the pack, refusing to ⁣play wide, ⁣no doubt out of fear⁤ of the Habs’ killer counterattacks. ⁤Few risks therefore, few pedals, few rides. A test of strength ⁤and, it ⁢must be admitted, a few lost balls. This is why this crucial evening for the Blues, this desire to celebrate on the ‍part of a fiery ‌audience ready to shout, was gradually​ diluted in the impotence⁢ of Dupont and his band.

Third consecutive victory‍ against the All‌ Blacks, the first ‌in⁢ 30 ‍years!

The French captain also suffered the comparison with his‍ counterpart Cameron ⁢Roigard, active and efficient and​ author of the New Zealanders’ ⁢second try just before the half hour mark, after several finally sustained waves had the merit of resisting ‌his teammates in ⁣the race ( 10-17 at⁢ halftime).

The beautiful‌ face of the Azzurri was therefore reserved for‍ the second act. Fabien​ Galthié’s men ⁣did ⁣what they do best. Resist, really this time, ​and create joyful disorder among the opponents with every ball recovered. The ⁣plan‍ worked wonderfully, with the All ​Blacks making things⁢ easier⁤ for​ them‍ by continuing to play their ‌restrictive rugby. Paul⁢ Boudehent with a penetrating maul and then Louis Bielle-Biarrey, scoring​ like an arrow a try against, allowed them to turn the situation around in ten minutes (24-17, 51st). Enough to wake up the stands, launch⁣ olas, Marseilles, increase pride.

Nothing better than a new success – ‌the ⁣third ‌consecutive⁣ after the 40-25 in 2021 and the 27-13 in the opening of the 2023 World Cup, a performance achieved only once ‌until then between 1994 and ⁤1995 – against‍ these players who we freeze a little quickly in the legend in view of the end of⁤ the ⁣tour ⁣and the final ⁤test against Argentina on this same⁤ lawn next Friday. And above all enough to face the next Six Nations with⁤ new guarantees. Because after the elimination in the quarter-finals ‌of the World Cup by South Africa (28-29), the ⁤Blues, deprived of⁣ their captain Antoine Dupont who ‍left his Olympic dream with ‍the team at the age of‍ 7 ⁣French,⁢ they ‍have never really convinced. A largely failed tournament, a tour ⁤to Argentina last July marked⁣ by ​the Jaminet and ⁣Auradou-Jegou events… There ⁤was an urgent need to restore the ⁢Italian image. It’s ‌done.

How does the psychological impact of the haka affect the performance of ⁣opposing teams during high-stakes rugby matches?

Time.news Interview: Expert Insights on the ⁤Thrilling Showdown ​Between ⁢France and New Zealand

Editor: Welcome to Time.news! Today, we are joined by ⁣rugby expert ⁣Dr. Clara⁣ Beaumont, a sports ⁣analyst ​and historian specializing ⁤in international rugby‍ dynamics.⁢ Clara,⁣ thank you for​ being here.

Dr. Beaumont: Thank you for having me! It’s always a pleasure to discuss⁤ such thrilling matches‍ as ​last⁢ night’s between‌ France and New Zealand.

Editor: Absolutely! It was⁣ an edge-of-the-seat encounter. France won 30-29, but it‌ certainly wasn’t an easy victory. What were the key elements that‌ led to‍ this narrow triumph?

Dr. Beaumont: The ‍match showcased a⁢ fierce defensive strategy from the⁤ French team. They were under ⁤pressure for much of ⁤the game, especially with New Zealand’s robust performance in the static phases and their ability to control⁣ the ball. France’s defense was critical; they​ managed to repel numerous assaults,‌ which ultimately​ kept them ahead.

Editor: Speaking of New Zealand’s performance, they​ seemed to come out strong, especially​ with their⁢ dynamic physical play. Did you expect ⁢that level of aggression from the All Blacks?

Dr. Beaumont: To be honest, ​yes and ‍no. Historically, the‌ All Blacks are ‌known⁢ for their physical prowess‍ and ‍aggressive style, but France is no stranger to intense rugby either. What stood out last night⁢ was New⁢ Zealand’s​ decision to play close to the pack and ‍minimize risks—a tactic perhaps born out of respect for France’s potent counterattacks. This more conservative ⁢approach created​ tension throughout the match.

Editor: It definitely created a ‍nail-biting atmosphere!⁤ The article mentions the “brilliant⁢ haka” and⁤ its symbolic significance. ‍How does the haka influence the psychological aspect of a game, especially in a⁢ high-stakes match like ‌this one?

Dr. Beaumont: ‍The ⁢haka is not just a ritual; it’s also a powerful psychological weapon. For‍ the All Blacks, it’s about asserting dominance ‌and rallying their spirit. However, it can also⁣ shift the mood of‍ opposing teams. In this‌ match, while the haka was mesmerizing, France seemed to channel that energy into their gameplay. Their audience support was palpable⁢ and may have helped dispel any intimidation they‌ might‍ have⁢ felt initially.

Editor: And ⁤speaking of support, the crowds at Saint-Denis were quite electrifying, weren’t they? How ⁣crucial is such home-ground advantage in⁣ rugby?

Dr. Beaumont: Home-ground advantage can be ‍game-changing. The French supporters created a ​charged atmosphere ​that likely bolstered the players’ morale. ⁤When‍ the‍ crowd is passionately involved, it can ⁤lift a team’s ​performance and induce⁤ pressure on opponents. We saw snippets of that last night, especially as France clung onto a slim lead.

Editor: Now, let’s discuss the ⁢French captain Antoine Dupont. He has long been‌ a key figure for ⁢the team, but reportedly struggled against Cameron Roigard, the New ⁤Zealand captain. What’s ⁢your take ⁢on their performances?

Dr. Beaumont: Dupont is indeed a phenomenal player, but even the best have off days, and this‌ was one‌ of them. Roigard, on⁣ the other hand, seems to be stepping into​ his role confidently. He was ⁣vital for New Zealand’s momentum, exemplifying effective ⁣leadership. This match ⁢highlighted‌ the ⁤contrast ‍between the two captains,⁤ with Roigard being more active and impactful at critical moments—especially that second‍ try ⁣before halftime.

Editor: This​ match was ​also historic for France—a⁢ third⁣ consecutive victory ‍against the​ All Blacks and their first in 30 years! How significant is this win⁤ for French rugby?

Dr. Beaumont: It’s monumental! This victory not only boosts the morale of the ​players but also reinforces ‍the legitimacy of French rugby on the​ world stage. Winning against a powerhouse like New Zealand, especially⁣ after three decades, will be seen as a turning point and a​ statement of intent⁣ for future competitions. It offers⁤ a ‌glimmer ​of hope and ⁢confidence for the squad moving forward.

Editor: Clara, ⁣your insights have been incredibly valuable. Thank you ⁢for ‍joining us and sharing your ‌expertise​ on ⁣this thrilling match!

Dr. Beaumont: Thank you! It’s been ‌a pleasure, and I look forward to more exciting encounters in the ‌rugby world!

You may also like

Leave a Comment