Gapyeong-gun ranks first in the nation in the business activities category of the Local Autonomy Competitiveness Index

by times news cr

Gapyeong-gun ranked first in the country in the management ‍activity category of the Local Autonomy Competitiveness Index. Gapyeong-gun (Governor Seo Tae-won)⁣ ranked⁤ first in the​ country in the management​ activity category among ⁢county-level⁣ autonomous organizations, according to an analysis of the Korea Competitiveness Index (KLCI). This​ is ​noteworthy because it is⁣ a leap forward this year following second place​ last year.

A military⁣ official said on the 22nd, “This achievement is meaningful in ⁤that Gapyeong County has proven that ⁤its⁣ policies aimed at ⁣sustainable development ‌and⁣ improving the quality of life⁢ of residents are effective.”

According to Gapyeong-gun, the Korea Public Autonomy Competitiveness‌ Index is an ‍indicator that has​ been evaluating the competitiveness of domestic local autonomy ‌since 1996. Developed with the ⁢goal ⁢of⁣ detailed analysis of local autonomous management​ performance and regional competitiveness, it measures competitiveness every year using official ⁢government statistics (80 indicators, 250 data) for 226 local governments across the country. This evaluation, now in its 29th​ year, has established itself as a standard for local autonomy competitiveness.

In particular, ⁢the management activity sector in which Gapyeong-gun ranked first is based on 25 detailed indicators, including civil⁢ complaint handling, home health care, financial independence, and ‌cultural tourism expenditures, in 11 ​areas including public administration, local finance, living environment, and local economy. . Gapyeong-gun achieved excellent results in all categories and ranked first nationwide among county-level local governments.

County Governor Seo Tae-won said, “As a result ⁣of the analysis of the Korea Public Autonomy Competitiveness⁢ Index, the fact that we were selected from 2nd place last year to ⁤1st place this year⁤ is a result of the tangible results of the ⁢projects‍ promoted during the 8th popular⁣ election,” and ⁢“We will work together with over 800 public officials to bring about innovation and change in the county administration and achieve​ great results⁤ next year.”⁢ “We will do our best to rank first in ⁤the overall‍ competitiveness category.”

Meanwhile, Gapyeong-gun held a ‘Resident Information Session on the Gyeonggi-do Eastern Social Overhead Capital (SOC) ⁤Development Plan’‌ at Music Station⁢ 1939 Music Hall on the 21st and announced a ‍specific business plan for balanced⁢ regional development and infrastructure expansion.⁢ About 100 people, including officials from related departments such as cities, roads, railways,⁣ and development projects in Gyeonggi-do and Gapyeong-gun,​ as well as residents, attended⁣ this briefing session.

The ‘Gyeonggi ⁤Eastern SOC Grand Development Plan’ was prepared to expand underdeveloped social overhead capital ⁣in the eastern part of Gyeonggi-do and strengthen regional competitiveness. Gapyeong-gun ‍announced 13 major road, railroad, and development projects to be included in the plan at a meeting last May. has been‍ proposed. Since then, ⁢the military has worked⁣ hard to ensure⁢ that the SOC development plan is ‍successfully implemented, including several consultations⁤ with relevant departments to reflect the project.

Gyeonggi Province plans ‍to collect residents’‌ opinions‍ on projects proposed by city‍ and ⁣county ⁤by the end of November and then announce the ‘Final Draft of the Gyeonggi ⁤Eastern SOC Grand Development Plan’ in December.

Park⁤ Young-sun, director of Gapyeong-gun⁤ Construction and ​Urban⁢ Affairs, said, “Of ⁣the​ 13 SOC development plans proposed by our‌ county‌ to Gyeonggi-do, 11 ⁤were accepted, and we ​decided to hold this briefing session to explain the ⁢details⁣ to the residents of Gyeonggi-do.” “We will continue to cooperate with the military and ‌do our best to ensure that the suggestions made by‍ our military ​are actively reflected,” he said.

The 13 projects proposed⁤ by Gapyeong-gun ⁤are ​△Opening ​of local ⁤road No.‍ 364​ (Gapyeong-Hyeonri) △Connecting to the expressway in the‍ northern​ part of Gyeonggi Province (feeder national road) △Route change and road opening for National Route 37 (Hacheon IC-Goseong) △Sangpan-Jeokmok section Opening of local roads △Jojongcheon Homyeong Bridge construction project △GTX Maseok~Gapyeong~Chuncheon extension △Sinseonbong mountain tourism development △Construction ⁣of a water leisure center △Opening of the⁢ Gapyeong section of the Gapyeong Dullegil⁢ △Gapyeong-gun Hwaakcheon Road construction project ⁣△Bukhan ⁣River bicycle path maintenance project △Bukhan River bicycle road‍ flooded section improvement project △Waterside within the sewage treatment area ​It is a zone release. ‍Among these, the Jojongcheon Homyeong⁤ Bridge construction‍ project and the release of waterfront ‍areas within the ⁣sewage treatment ⁢area were not included or classified as mid- ⁣to long-term review projects.

Economy ‌Queen Choi Hana ⁤reporter photo Gapyeong-gun

How does resident engagement influence‌ the⁤ success of local governance initiatives in Gapyeong-gun?

Interview: Time.news Editor and Local Autonomy Expert

Editor: Good morning, and​ thank you for joining us today. We’re excited ⁤to discuss the outstanding achievement ‍of Gapyeong-gun, which recently ranked first in the management⁢ activity category of the ⁤Local Autonomy Competitiveness ‌Index. To help us understand the significance of this, we have with us Dr. Hyun-woo Lee, an expert in ‌local governance and public administration. Dr. Lee, welcome!

Dr. Lee: Thank you​ for having me.‍ It’s a pleasure to be here.

Editor: Let’s⁢ dive right in. Gapyeong-gun moved⁢ from second place to first in this competitive index, which evaluates various aspects of local governance. What does this ​mean⁣ for the residents of Gapyeong-gun?

Dr. Lee: This achievement is incredibly significant for the residents. It not only ⁣reflects the effectiveness of the county’s policies but ‌also indicates that the⁤ local government⁣ is ⁤responsive to ⁣the needs of its citizens. The fact that‍ they have implemented ⁤sustainable development strategies that improve the Quality of Life speaks volumes about the ​commitment to‌ serving the community effectively.

Editor: The evaluation itself is based on⁤ a comprehensive set of criteria, including civil complaint handling and financial independence. Could you elaborate on how such diverse indicators contribute to the overall ranking?

Dr. Lee: Absolutely. The‍ Korea Public Autonomy Competitiveness⁤ Index measures various aspects because local governance is ‌multifaceted. For instance, strong civil complaint handling fosters trust between the government and the citizens, ​while financial independence indicates sound management ⁢of resources. All ‌these indicators together create a holistic view of the county’s performance, ensuring that diverse elements like public administration ​and the local economy are addressed.

Editor: Governor Seo Tae-won highlighted teamwork among about 800 public officials as key ‍to this success. How crucial is collaboration⁢ among government officials in achieving such ⁢improvements?

Dr. Lee: Collaboration is essential! Local governance thrives on⁣ the dynamic ⁤interplay ‍between various departments and officials. In Gapyeong-gun’s case, collective efforts translate into innovative solutions for local issues. Such cooperation ensures that multiple perspectives and expertise come together, leading to comprehensive strategies⁤ that can meet the community’s diverse needs.

Editor: ⁢ Interesting! You mentioned earlier the role‍ of sustainable development.‍ How does Gapyeong-gun’s focus on⁤ this aspect set it apart, especially now in light of economic and environmental challenges?

Dr. Lee: Sustainable development is becoming increasingly vital. ‌Gapyeong-gun’s proactive stance not only enhances the quality of‍ life but ⁤also ensures​ the longevity ​of the region’s resources. By‌ integrating sustainability into its policies, the county prepares ⁣itself to face future economic and environmental ⁣challenges, making⁣ it a model for other local governments.

Editor: Recently, Gapyeong-gun also⁤ held a ‍resident information session about their ⁤Eastern Social‍ Overhead Capital ⁢Development Plan. How does engaging residents in such planning processes affect the outcomes of local projects?

Dr. Lee: Engaging⁣ residents is paramount for the success of any local initiative. By ‍involving the community in​ discussions about development plans, the government can⁣ gather valuable ‌insights‍ and foster a sense of ownership among‌ the residents. This ⁣not only⁤ leads to better⁣ project design—tailored to meet actual needs—but also enhances transparency and trust in local governance.

Editor: Looking ahead, what challenges do‍ you think Gapyeong-gun might face as it​ aims to retain​ its top position in the overall competitiveness category?

Dr. Lee: The primary ​challenges will be maintaining momentum and ensuring ongoing citizen engagement. As Gapyeong-gun sets ambitious goals, it⁢ must ⁢remain adaptable to emerging trends and needs,​ along with continuously ‌evaluating and improving its‌ programs. Additionally, economic fluctuations or changes in​ administrative framework could impact their efforts, so⁢ resilience and innovation will be ⁣key.

Editor: Thank you, Dr. Lee,‌ for sharing your insights on Gapyeong-gun’s remarkable achievement and the broader implications for local governance. It’s clear ‍that such advancements in efficiency and community integration could⁢ serve as a beacon for other local governments.

Dr. Lee: ⁢ Thank you for having me! It’s exciting to ⁤discuss these⁤ developments, and I‍ hope more regions will follow ⁢Gapyeong-gun’s lead in building a robust and responsive local governance system.

Editor: And thank you to our⁣ audience‍ for tuning in. We will continue to monitor developments⁣ in local governance and share stories ⁢of ‌innovation and success. Until next time!

You may also like

Leave a Comment