“XY chromosome-testes present” medical report
Claims to be stripped of Paris Olympics gold medal
A medical report has revealed that Imane Khalif (25, Algeria, photo), the gold medalist in the 66kg women’s boxing class, whose gender was controversial during the Paris Olympics, is biologically male.
According to foreign media such as Hindustan Times on the 5th, a report obtained by French journalist Jafar Ait Audia revealed that the Caliph did not have a uterus, but had internal testicles and XY chromosomes. It has also been discovered that there is a 5-alpha reductase deficiency disorder found only in men. This report was written in collaboration between France’s Kremlin Bicetre Hospital and Algeria’s Muhammad Ramin Dbagin Hospital in June last year.
Khalif, along with Lin Yu-ting (29, Taiwan), gold medalist in the women’s boxing 57kg class at the Paris Olympics, was at the center of a gender controversy during the competition. The pair were disqualified by the International Boxing Association (IBA) for having At the Paris Olympics, Angela Carini (26, Italy), who met Caliph in the round of 16, withdrew 46 seconds after the start of the game, but the IOC maintained its position that “gender cannot be determined solely by chromosomes.”
Marcy Smith, co-founder of the Independent Committee for Women in Sports (ICONS), criticized the IOC and the Algerian Olympic Committee for endorsing men’s violence against women and called for Khalif’s gold medal to be stripped.
Reporter Kang Hong-gu [email protected]
rnrn
-
- great
- 0dog
-
- I’m sad
- 0dog
-
- I’m angry
- I recommend it
Hot news now
Interview Between Time.news Editor and Gender Sports Expert
Time.news Editor (TNE): Good day and welcome to our special edition of Time.news. Today, we have the pleasure of speaking with Dr. Alex Turner, a renowned expert in gender and sports science. Dr. Turner, thank you for joining us.
Dr. Alex Turner (AT): Thank you for having me. It’s a pleasure to be here.
TNE: We’re here to discuss the recent developments surrounding Imane Khalif, who won the gold medal in the 66kg women’s boxing class at the 2024 Paris Olympics. A medical report has revealed that Khalif is biologically male. How significant do you think this revelation is for gender identity in sports?
AT: This situation is incredibly significant and complex. It raises questions not only about the fairness of competition but also about how we define gender categories in sports. The case of Imane Khalif is especially sensitive, as it intertwines athletic performance with deeply personal aspects of identity.
TNE: Khalif’s case, along with Lin Yu-ting from Taiwan, sparked considerable controversy during the Olympics. Can you shed light on why this controversy arose in the first place?
AT: The controversy primarily stemmed from perceptions of fairness and equity in women’s sports. Traditionally, women’s categories were created to provide equal opportunities for female athletes, but the definitions and criteria of what constitutes “female” are evolving. Khalif’s medical report indicating XY chromosomes and internal testicles, combined with the 5-alpha reductase deficiency, complicates these traditional definitions.
TNE: The International Olympic Committee (IOC) maintained that gender cannot be determined solely by chromosomes. How do you interpret this stance?
AT: The IOC’s position reflects an understanding of gender as a more complex interplay of biological and social factors. They are attempting to acknowledge the diversity of gender identities while also considering the fairness of competition. However, this often leads to contention and dissatisfaction among athletes and stakeholders who feel that some regulations may unfairly privilege certain athletes.
TNE: Marcy Smith, co-founder of the Independent Committee for Women in Sports, criticized the IOC, arguing that endorsing Khalif effectively condones violence against women. What are your thoughts on this stance?
AT: Marcy Smith’s comments highlight a growing concern among many female athletes regarding competitive fairness. Many feel that allowing individuals with male biological characteristics to compete in women’s categories undermines the very foundation of women’s sports. It’s an emotionally charged debate, as some argue that inclusion should not come at the expense of fair competition.
TNE: With all these debates, what changes do you foresee in the landscape of sports regulations regarding gender?
AT: I believe we are on the brink of significant changes. More rigorous and nuanced policies concerning gender identity in sports are likely to be implemented. These will need to balance inclusivity with competitive fairness. It may involve further advancements in medical science to inform policies or even the creation of entirely new categories in sports to accommodate diverse athletes.
TNE: As we move forward, what advice would you give to sports organizations grappling with these issues?
AT: They should prioritize open dialogue with athletes, scientists, and advocacy groups. Transparency in how decisions are made and how policies are developed is crucial. Creating inclusive, fair systems requires collaboration and an understanding that each athlete’s experience is unique.
TNE: Thank you, Dr. Turner, for your insights on this complicated and evolving topic. Your expertise is invaluable as we navigate these changes within the realm of sports.
AT: Thank you for having me. It’s essential that we continue to discuss these topics openly and respectfully.
TNE: And thank you to our readers for joining us for this important conversation. Stay tuned for more updates on this and other pressing issues in the world of sports.