Listen to the audio version of the article
The prosecutor Andrea Petroni requested a life sentence for Filippo Turetta, at the end of the indictment of the trial for the murder of Giulia Cecchettin, before the Court of Assizes of Venice. Delivering a written statement, in two-and-a-half hours the prosecutor first reconstructed the chronology of the facts, denying the possible elements of the defence. Turetta repeatedly did not tell the truth, Petroni said, despite having every opportunity to tell it and an education that could have avoided the crime. The prosecutor asked for Turetta’s life sentence on the International Day for the Elimination of Violence. The twenty-year-old student was mercilessly killed by her ex-boyfriend, a murder that shook Italy by bringing the topic of patriarchy back to the center of the debate. Turetta is charged with aggravated voluntary manslaughter, kidnapping and concealment of a body.
There is no doubt about Turetta’s guilt
“The guilt of the accused is not in doubt, the evidence is so clear against Turetta, one is spoiled for choice” of the elements that make him responsible for the murder of his ex-girlfriend Giulia Cecchettin, says the prosecutor in the indictment, before the Assize Court of Venice. The young student, one step away from the degree, was already attacked “repeatedly” from the parking lot of Vigonovo and until twenty minutes later when the silhouette of the twenty-year-old was filmed, on the ground, in an industrial area of the city. Even so, recalled the prosecutor. Turetta looked at the indictment without delay, with his head down. Not to be disturbed as Andrea Petroni recreates the murder of Giulia, who was killed with 75 wounds inflicted by her ex-boyfriend on trial. This is the second time, following the questioning at the last hearing, that Turetta will appear before the Assize Court.
Giulia hit several times, the attack in the parking lot lasted six minutes
In the parking lot «there was no time for an argument, everything lasted six minutes: some blood stains were found, an unhandled knife blade, the blood definitely came from the guilty person. There is a dynamic attack, Giulia was conscious and asking for help”, said the prosecutor. Giulia is forced to get back into the car and before arriving at Fossó, “she was hit several times: she is bleeding very hard as shown by the traces of blood in the car”, said the prosecutor. The attack in the industrial area barely survives, which the video from a company camera above all shows “the defenseless person on the ground, which means that there is a whole series of injuries, especially the 25 injuries to the hands, the immobilization and the silence (use scotch tape, ed.) that happened before, they have no reason to be behind.”
Father Gino posts images of the motto: ”If you don’t want me, you can’t”
Gino, the victim’s father, who is not in court today, posted the video of the ‘Una senza centomila’ foundation on his profile, the campaign with the slogan ‘If I don’t want you, you can’t’ to educate about gender. violence
The charges at Turetta
Before the Court of Justice of Venice, the prosecutor Andrea Petroni is ready to ask for a life sentence for the twenty-two-year-old accused of voluntary aggravated murder, kidnapping and hiding a body. Petroni first described the chain of events in detail. Only after a week on the run, Filippo Turetta is stopped in Germany and admits that he killed Giulia Cecchettin: «He is not turning himself in, but he has spent money and is preparing for arrest through the evidence on his phone delete pocket. », said the Venetian prosecutor in his indictment. The public prosecutor focused his lens on the things that the accused got ready: “There is no victim’s mobile phone, there is no bloody Turetta clothes”, are some of the examples that the prosecutor mentioned in the courtroom.
What legal precedents exist regarding sentencing in cases of gender-based violence in Italy?
Interview between Time.news Editor and Legal Expert
Editor: Good evening, everyone. Today we are delving into a tragic case that has captured the attention of Italy and beyond. Joining me is Dr. Laura Conti, a legal expert and researcher specializing in gender-based violence and criminal law. Thank you for being here, Dr. Conti.
Dr. Conti: Thank you for having me. It’s an important topic to discuss, especially given recent events.
Editor: To start, let’s recap the case of Filippo Turetta and Giulia Cecchettin. Prosecutor Andrea Petroni has requested a life sentence for Turetta, who is accused of brutally murdering his ex-girlfriend, Giulia. What are your initial thoughts on the prosecutor’s statement and the evidence presented?
Dr. Conti: The prosecutor’s insistence on the clarity of the evidence is crucial. Turetta is charged with aggravated voluntary manslaughter, kidnapping, and concealment of a body, which suggests a systematic and premeditated approach to the crime. It’s horrifying to hear that Giulia was attacked multiple times in a parking lot and then again in a vehicle, enduring such violence alone.
Editor: It is incredibly tragic. The prosecutor mentioned that the entire attack lasted only six minutes and that Giulia was conscious and pleading for help. From a legal perspective, how does this factor into the case?
Dr. Conti: The time frame is significant. It indicates that the attack was swift and brutal, which may underline the premeditated nature of the violence. Moreover, the fact that she was pleading for assistance emphasizes not only her vulnerability but also the absolute disregard Turetta had for her life. These details are pivotal in portraying the gravity of his actions to the jury.
Editor: Petroni also stated that Turetta did not tell the truth during the proceedings, despite having the opportunity to do so. How does a defendant’s credibility—or lack thereof—impact a trial like this?
Dr. Conti: Credibility is vital. If a defendant is perceived as dishonest or evasive, it can tarnish their defense significantly. In cases involving such severe charges, jurors typically scrutinize the accuser’s integrity closely. Turetta’s lack of transparency could reinforce the prosecution’s case and further alienate him in the eyes of the jury.
Editor: On another note, this trial is drawing attention to the broader issue of patriarchy and gender violence in Italy. Why is it important to address these societal issues in the context of such a trial?
Dr. Conti: Cases like this often serve as a catalyst for broader discussions on violence against women. The persistence of patriarchal attitudes in society fuels many of these crimes. Public trials can raise awareness and prompt societal change if they garner enough attention. It’s an opportunity to highlight not only the individual tragedy but also the systemic issues that allow such violence to continue.
Editor: You mentioned the International Day for the Elimination of Violence coinciding with the prosecutor’s request for a life sentence. How impactful do you think this timing is on public perception of the case?
Dr. Conti: It’s incredibly significant. The alignment of the trial with a global day focused on eliminating violence against women amplifies the message that this is not just an isolated incident, but part of a larger epidemic. It can galvanize public sentiment and emphasize the urgency of addressing gender-based violence in society.
Editor: Dr. Conti, thank you for sharing your insights on this devastating case. It’s essential that we continue discussing these issues, not only in the courtroom but throughout our communities.
Dr. Conti: Thank you for having me. It’s crucial to keep these conversations alive to foster understanding and change.
Editor: And to our viewers, thank you for joining us today. We’ll continue to follow this case and its implications for society closely. Stay informed and engaged.