The Secretary of National Defense announced that, starting this Saturday, its acronym will change from Sedena to Defensa.
The graphic identity of the bodies that make up the Army was modified as of this Saturday, which has not happened for more than 80 years.
You might be interested in: The new judges will come from the towns: Sheinbaum
In an informative note, the agency indicated that the change was made with “the authorization of the President of the Republic and supreme commander of the armed forces, the acronym Sedena to identify the Secretariat of National Defense was replaced by the word Defense.” .
The Defense asserted that with its new identity it will allow “Mexican society and national and international institutions to have more clarity about the main function of the Secretariat of National Defense and greater understanding and coordination of all the activities carried out in this sector for the benefit of Mexicans.”
You might be interested in: INAI asks legislators to pause its disappearance
On October 25, 1937, the Secretariat of War and Navy was transformed into the Secretariat of National Defense (Sedena).
Throughout history its name has undergone various modifications, such as Secretary of State and the Office of War and Navy, Ministry of War and Navy, and Secretary of War and Navy, until reaching the creation of what has since been known as Secretariat. of National Defense and which from today will have the acronym Defense.
Related
Interview between Time.News Editor and Defense Expert
Time.News Editor (TNE): Welcome to our special segment! Today, we have with us Dr. Laura Martinez, a defense analyst and expert in military affairs. Recently, the Secretary of National Defense announced a significant rebranding initiative—changing its acronym from Sedena to Defensa. Dr. Martinez, thank you for joining us!
Dr. Laura Martinez (DLM): Thank you for having me! It’s great to be here.
TNE: Let’s dive right in. What motivated the decision to change the acronym from Sedena to Defensa?
DLM: The rebranding is aimed at refreshing the public image of the military and making it more relatable. By adopting the term “Defensa,” which translates to “Defense,” they are shifting the focus from the institution itself to its core mission—protecting the sovereignty and safety of the nation.
TNE: That’s intriguing. How significant is this change in terms of public perception and engagement?
DLM: It’s quite significant. The name change can serve as a strategy to foster trust and transparency between the military and the civilian population. In recent years, there has been increased scrutiny of the military’s role in domestic affairs, and this rebranding could signal a shift towards a more open dialogue.
TNE: We often see branding initiatives in the corporate world, but how does this parallel with military organizations?
DLM: That’s a great observation! In both sectors, branding is about identity. For a military organization, a name can symbolize its commitment and effectiveness. By moving to “Defensa,” they are emphasizing their protective role, which could attract greater civic support, especially in a time when security issues are paramount.
TNE: How do you think this change will impact the military’s operational strategies?
DLM: While the acronym shift might not directly alter operational protocols, it could influence how the military approaches its missions. A focus on defense implies a proactive stance on protecting civilian life and responding to emergencies, which could translate to adjustments in training and deployment strategies.
TNE: That’s a fascinating angle. Looking ahead, what challenges do you foresee in implementing this change?
DLM: The primary challenge will be ensuring that all levels of the military embrace this new identity in a meaningful way. Change requires not just a new logo or acronym, but also a shift in culture and mindset. Furthermore, they will need to effectively communicate this transformation to both military personnel and the general public, to avoid confusion or resistance.
TNE: Communication will definitely be key. So, do you think the public will respond positively?
DLM: Ideally, yes. If the implementation is handled carefully and the military demonstrates its commitment to civilian safety and well-being, I believe the public will welcome this change. It could lead to a renewed sense of national pride and support for the armed forces.
TNE: Thanks for your insights, Dr. Martinez. Any final thoughts on what this could mean for the future of Mexico’s national defense strategy?
DLM: If done correctly, this rebranding could be a landmark moment for Mexico’s military. It represents an opportunity to redefine their mission, strengthen civilian-military relations, and adapt to the evolving security landscape. It’s a crucial step toward a more modern and engaged defense strategy.
TNE: Those are very thoughtful insights. Thank you again for your time, Dr. Martinez. We look forward to seeing how this change unfolds!
DLM: Thank you for having me! It’s always a pleasure to discuss these important topics.