Government begins full-scale management of uncertainty in the US presidential election… Weekly meetings with ministers of related ministries

by times news cr

First-level‌ meeting held to discuss impact of US ⁢presidential election results and response
Share information and check response direction through weekly ministerial meetings

Choi Sang-mok, Deputy Prime Minister for Economy and Minister of Strategy and Finance, is speaking at the‍ Economic Relations Ministers’ Meeting​ and Foreign Economy Ministers’ Meeting held at the ‌Seoul Government Complex in Jongno-gu, Seoul on the morning of the 7th.‍ 2024.11.07. Newsis

With former President Donald Trump elected in the 47th U.S. presidential ⁢election, the government, in cooperation with related ministries, is starting to respond in earnest to the launch of the new U.S. administration.

The ‍Ministry of Strategy and Finance, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and Ministry of Trade, Industry ⁤and Energy held a level 1 situation review meeting ⁤of related​ ministries on the 8th.

The meeting was attended by Choi Ji-young, International ​Economic Management Director at the Ministry of Strategy and Finance, Kim Hee-sang, Economic and Diplomatic Coordinator at the Ministry ⁤of Foreign ⁣Affairs, and Park Jong-won, Assistant Minister for Trade at the Ministry of Trade, Industry and​ Energy.

As a follow-up measure to the economic ministers’ meeting and foreign economic ‌ministers’ meeting held the previous day (the 7th), the impact of the results of the​ US presidential election was reviewed and future response plans at the⁣ government-wide level were discussed.

Changes ‌in the external environment are expected due to candidate Trump’s election in the US presidential election held ‌on the 5th.‍

Accordingly, the relevant ministries plan to faithfully implement the decision of the previous day’s Economic Ministers’ Meeting that “preemptive and thorough responses⁣ are necessary to minimize uncertainty affecting our economy and businesses.”

In particular, until the next administration takes office, in principle, it was decided to hold weekly meetings with the ​ministers of relevant ministries (Ministry of Strategy ⁣and Finance, Ministry of ⁣Foreign Affairs, Ministry‌ of Trade, Industry and Energy, Office of National Security, etc.) to share information‍ related to the ⁣launch ​of ​the new U.S. government and coordinate the direction of response at the government level.

In addition,⁣ as President Yoon Seok-yeol and President-elect ⁣Trump agreed to ‘meet as soon as possible’ in a phone call, ‌they ⁢also decided to discuss agenda items ‍related⁤ to high-level exchanges in the new US administration.

[세종=뉴시스]

Hot news now

Interview‍ between Time.news Editor ⁤and Economic Expert ‍on ​the Post-US Election Response

Time.news Editor (TNE): Welcome to Time.news. Today, we’re diving ‌into the‍ implications of the​ recent U.S. presidential election and the immediate response from South Korea’s government. Joining us is Dr.‌ Kim Joon-suk, ⁣an expert in international economics and trade policy. Thank you for being with us, Dr. Kim.

Dr. Kim Joon-suk​ (DK): Thank you‌ for ⁢having me. It’s a ​pleasure to discuss this important⁣ topic.

TNE: The election⁣ of Donald ⁣Trump has already sparked significant ​attention​ in⁣ South ⁣Korea. The‍ government‌ held a level 1‍ situation review meeting shortly after the election‌ results. What concerns⁣ do you​ think are driving⁣ this urgency?

DK: There are ⁤several reasons for this swift response. First, Donald Trump⁣ is known for his unpredictable foreign policy, particularly regarding trade. His previous ⁤administration introduced tariffs on various goods, and ‌many in South Korea worry that a⁢ similar approach could be reinstated. Such ⁣actions could have detrimental effects on ​our economy, ‍especially ‍for the industries ‍that ‍rely heavily on exports.

TNE: Absolutely,‍ and as reported, the​ South Korean⁢ government is ⁤keen on having weekly meetings among⁣ key ⁢ministries. Why is⁤ this approach crucial at this juncture?

DK: Weekly meetings are ‍essential for​ a coherent and unified response to any shifts in U.S. policy. Given the complexity of⁣ international economics,‌ rapid changes can⁢ create uncertainty. By ⁢convening regularly, ⁢ministries such as⁢ Strategy and Finance, Foreign Affairs, and Trade can share updates and develop strategies collectively‍ to manage risks.

TNE: It seems like a⁤ coordinated effort is vital ‍to navigate potential challenges. Are⁣ there specific sectors in South Korea that you‍ believe could be​ most affected‍ by Trump’s policies?

DK: Yes, definitely. The automotive and electronics sectors could ‍be significantly impacted. ⁣These industries are not⁢ only major players⁤ in South Korea’s export ​portfolio but also sensitive ⁣to changes in trade relations. If tariffs are introduced again or‍ if the new administration shifts its‍ stance on trade agreements, ​companies in these sectors ‍could face increased costs⁤ or barriers to entry in⁢ the U.S. market.

TNE: The government’s proactive stance is​ interesting. As ‌mentioned, there are plans to implement ‘preemptive’ measures. What kind of measures do you foresee could be beneficial in this context?

DK: Preemptive measures could include setting up support systems for ⁣affected industries, enhancing public-private partnerships to foster resilience, and possibly negotiating with ‍other trading partners to diversify markets. Implementing contingency plans, ​such as‍ increasing ​domestic⁢ investment, can​ also help cushion potential shocks from the⁢ U.S. market.

TNE: ⁤Those⁤ sound like pragmatic strategies. Looking forward, what longer-term ⁣implications do you think Trump’s return to presidency could have on U.S.-South Korea relations?

DK: In the long run, if Trump adopts a protectionist stance again, it may strain economic ​ties. ‍On ⁢the other hand, if South Korea adapts quickly and effectively, it could ‍open⁢ new avenues ​for collaboration, particularly in technology and defense sectors.‍ Moreover, how both countries approach‌ issues such as ‌North Korea‍ will be crucial, as⁤ this relationship also influences economic policies.

TNE: It’s certainly a delicate balance. Lastly, ⁢Dr. ​Kim, what message do⁤ you ‍think the⁢ South Korean government should prioritize in its communication with the public regarding these developments?

DK: Transparency is key. The government should regularly ⁢inform the public ‌about potential impacts and​ the steps being taken to mitigate risks. Building public confidence in the government’s ability⁣ to handle⁢ these changes is crucial, as​ it ensures that⁤ businesses and consumers can ⁣make informed ⁤decisions during uncertain times.

TNE: Thank you,‍ Dr. Kim, for your​ insightful analysis. It ‍illustrates the complexities of international relations, ‌especially in a⁤ shifting political landscape. We appreciate your time!

DK: Thank you for⁢ having me!⁢ It’s been a pleasure discussing‍ these critical ⁣issues.

You may also like

Leave a Comment