2024-03-15 12:30:30
The Venezuelan opposition leader questioned the police agreement between Chile and his country, and said that the Chilean president “must explain whether or not he shared information with the dictatorship.”
The opposition leader of Venezuela, Juan Guaidó criticized the agreement to share police information between Chile and his countrywhen sending a message to Chilean President Gabriel Boric, after learning of the death of former military man Ronald Ojeda.
Through a video that he shared on his account on the social network You cannot relativize a dictatorship by reaching police agreements with Maduro“.
In the audiovisual record, he stated that “the murder of Lieutenant Ojeda deserves justice and should help us put into perspective that the Venezuela crisis has continental consequences“.
He reiterated that “It is unacceptable to normalize or relativize a dictatorship with things like a police agreement with the Maduro regimeas did the Undersecretary of the Interior of Chile, Manuel Monsalve, on January 18.”
An agreement “about which President Boric’s administration must at least explain whether or not it shared information with the dictatorship“said the opponent of Nicolás Maduro.
“Dire consequences”
Juan Guaidó asserted in his message to President Gabriel Boric that the aforementioned agreement “has implications for, for example, the placement of refugees. “The consequences would be dire.”
And he insisted on his criticism for “normalize a dictatorship that is investigated for committing crimes against humanity. “That the State implements to repress, which was described on March 8, 2015 as an unusual and extraordinary threat by the United States.”
“His boss has a reward for capture. And yese indicates him (…) as a supplier of firearms for groups such as the FARC and the ELN“added the Venezuelan opposition leader.
For Guaidó, “Venezuelan authoritarianism, clearly typified as a narco-state, cannot be an ally of a law-abiding democracy. And even less allowing or sponsoring mechanisms of persecution and kidnapping of dissent,” he concluded.