“Lee Jae-myung’s sentencing is important… “This explanation is not appropriate.”
“Taxation of virtual assets is postponed for 2 years… “Formation of the People’s Livelihood Economy Special Committee”
On the 21st, Han Dong-hoon, representative of the People Power Party, drew a line regarding the ‘party member bulletin board controversy’ in which slanderous posts against President Yoon Seok-yeol and his wife were posted in the name of himself and his family, saying, “It is not a matter of falling into unnecessary self-deprecation.”
Representative Han met with reporters after the Supreme Committee meeting at the National Assembly in Yeouido, Seoul, this morning and said, “Not long ago, people were making it seem like I was avoiding this question in passing while being asked about other people’s livelihoods. I don’t know who is doing that, but we are committed to change. “I promised reform, and I think this is the last opportunity to put that into practice,” he said. “As the party leader, I will make good judgments and respond accordingly.”
He continued, “The party has announced legal action, so if there is any violation of the law, it will be thoroughly investigated and the truth will be revealed.” He continued, “The reason why the party is not responding at a time when it is important to respond to Democratic Party leader Lee Jae-myung’s perjury (response to the first trial verdict) is because that is the case. “It was my judgment as the party leader that it was not appropriate to cover up other issues,” he said.
When asked whether the facts should be pointed out if a family member’s name is stolen, he said, “The party has a legal obligation (to protect) party membership,” and added, “Unless it is a matter of illegality, it is not appropriate for Geongeon to explain.” He pointed out, “It’s related to party membership, so do we have to talk about it every time it comes up?”
In response to the point that unlike the Kim Dae-nam and Myeong Tae-gyun incidents, there were no preemptive measures such as confirmation of party membership, he refuted, “(The incident) was not a matter of rank-and-file party members, but rather, he said he had left the party.” Even when pointed out that he was drawing a line on party audits, he responded, “It’s a matter for the party system to decide.”
un-jeong, being mentioned as the author of the post, he only said, “I will replace it with what I said earlier.”
Secretary-General Seo Beom-soo also responded to the possibility of an audit of party affairs related to the controversy over the party member bulletin board on the same day, saying, “We don’t think it is a subject, but we will review it again and think about (another method).”
Meanwhile, Representative Han pointed out that the Democratic Party opposes the government’s postponement of virtual asset taxation and is pushing for a tax law revision to increase the deduction limit for sales profits, saying, “With our current state of preparation, fair and equitable taxation is difficult.”
He continued, “How can we take responsibility for the confusion when taxes are imposed without preparation? “The majority of our more than 8 million people (investors) are young people,” he said. “Above all, we need to protect young people in a situation where they are using virtual assets as a ladder to create assets.”
Regarding the amendment to the commercial law promoted by the Democratic Party, he said, “It is very natural that the interests of shareholders must be protected and must be protected,” but he also said, “I do not support uniformly including shareholders in the legal obligation of loyalty.”
Regarding the need to introduce financial rules, he said, “Some people say that creating rules ahead of the budget itself is burdensome, but since it is budget season, it is necessary to check and promote it,” and added, “This is something that the Moon Jae-in administration also promoted.”
Regarding the Special Committee on People’s Livelihood and Economy, he said, “We have not decided who will be the chairman,” and “What politics should do is move forward toward the people’s livelihood, and the budget remaining at the end of the year is also tied to the people’s livelihood. He explained, “We will closely check with people in the party, the government, and experts and try to iron out any shortcomings.”
[서울=뉴시스]
-
- great
- 0dog
-
- I’m sad
- 0dog
-
- I’m angry
- 0dog
-
- I recommend it
- dog
Hot news now
What are the key issues being debated in South Korea regarding party membership and tax policies?
The text discusses political matters related to party membership, tax policies, and legislative actions within a South Korean political context. The conversation features a representative’s stance on various issues including the handling of party member disputes, taxation of virtual assets, the protection of shareholder interests, and financial regulations.
The dialog highlights the complexity and sensitivity surrounding party dynamics, specifically regarding party audits and membership integrity. The mention of potential audits indicates scrutiny over party activities, while discussions around virtual asset taxation reveal concerns for equitable taxation and protection of younger investors.
The emphasis on protecting young investors using virtual assets aligns with broader discussions on economic justice and the impacts of policy decisions on specific demographics. Moreover, the introduction of financial rules suggests a need for regulatory frameworks that adapt to emerging economic challenges, reflecting a proactive approach to governance.
The representative’s commitment to ensuring the interests of various stakeholders, including shareholders and young investors, illustrates the nuanced balancing act required in political leadership. the content presents a snapshot of current legislative efforts and the complexities embedded in party politics and economic policy formation in South Korea.