At the Turin Film Festival, Sharon Stone sharply criticized the role of “uneducated” men in Donald Trump’s election victory. The actor draws parallels with Italian political history.
The most important thing in a nutshell
Sharon Stone criticizes “uneducated” men for Trump’s election victory.
The actor draws parallels with Italian political history.
Stone, who supported Kamala Harris in the election campaign, had already announced months ago that she might want to leave the US if Donald Trump were to become president again.
Donald Trump It’s over in the US election Kamala Harris win In the weeks following Trump’s victory, many celebrities have expressed their views publicly, some celebrating and others disappointed. Well Hollywood actress Sharon Stone also said. The US portal “Newsweek” reports on this.
Stone: Trump voters are ‘uneducated’ and ‘extremely naive’
At a press conference at the Turin Film Festival Stone said: “We have to stop and think about who we elect to our government. And whether we actually elect our government or the government elects itself.” Stone drew parallels Italian history with fascism and said: “Italy has seen these things – you understand what is happening. You have seen this before.”
She described the USA as “in its puberty”, which is “naive and arrogant” be. Without mentioning Trump directly, she explained: “We have not seen this in our country. Americans who are not traveling, 80 percent of them who do not have a passport, who are uneducated“, said the Hollywood star. Stone further referred to the US citizens as “extremely naive”.
Is Stone leaving the US because of Trump?
Before the election there was Stone indicated that she would consider moving to Europe if Trump won. “I’m definitely thinking about a house in Italy,” she told the Daily Mail. “I think this is a smart build right now.” Regarding Trump, she said: “This is one of the first times in my life that I have seen someone run for office on a platform of hatred and oppression.” Stone has yet to say publicly whether she will move forward with her plans to leave the United States.
In her election campaign The Democrat supported Kamala Harris, 66 years old, in the election campaign. According to Deadline magazine, she has already fired back at her Republican opponent Donald Trump during a gala at the Paris Olympics. Harris is a “qualified person,” Stone said of the vice president. She’s not a game show host that looks like a 1975 Vegas action show.”
What role do celebrities play in shaping political discourse and public opinion?
Interview between Time.news Editor and Political Analyst
Time.news Editor (TNE): Welcome to this special edition of Time.news, where we dive into the latest cultural and political discussions. Today, we’re excited to have with us political analyst Dr. Elena Giordano, who specializes in the intersections of politics and popular culture. Welcome, Dr. Giordano!
Dr. Elena Giordano (EG): Thank you for having me! I’m thrilled to be here.
TNE: Recently, during the Turin Film Festival, Sharon Stone made headlines by criticizing the role of “uneducated” men in Donald Trump’s electoral success. How significant is her comment in the context of today’s political discourse in the U.S.?
EG: Sharon Stone’s remarks are quite significant. They highlight the ongoing debates about education, political engagement, and the factors that shape electoral outcomes. By labeling some voters as “uneducated,” she is pointing to a broader issue of how knowledge—or the lack thereof—can shape political landscapes. It’s a provocative statement that challenges us to consider who we allow to influence our democracy.
TNE: She also drew parallels to Italian political history. Can you elaborate on what she might be referring to?
EG: Absolutely. Italy, particularly under Mussolini’s fascist regime, saw a significant rise in populism and the manipulation of public sentiment by exploiting fears and misinformation. By referencing this history, Stone urges us to be vigilant about the rhetoric used in politics, suggesting that we may be at risk of repeating past mistakes. It’s a reminder that history can inform our present choices.
TNE: Stone stated that we should think about whether we actually elect our government or if the government elects itself. What implications does this have in today’s context?
EG: This is a critical point. It touches on issues of political agency and representation. Many Americans feel disillusioned, believing that elite interests often overshadow the will of the average voter. This sentiment can lead to apathy and disengagement, potentially undermining democratic processes. Furthermore, it raises questions about systemic issues like gerrymandering and campaign financing, where the mechanisms of democracy may appear more manipulated than truly representative.
TNE: She expressed an alarming possibility—that she might consider leaving the U.S. if Trump were to be re-elected. This sentiment seems to resonate with some cultural figures. What does this reveal about the current political climate?
EG: It reflects a growing sense of existential uncertainty among some segments of the population, particularly in the arts and entertainment industries. High-profile figures like Stone often catalyze discussions about core values, freedoms, and the societal direction of the country. Leaving the U.S. symbolizes a profound disappointment and a feeling of being politically alienated, which could mobilize others to speak out or even take action.
TNE: In light of Stone’s statements, do you believe public figures have a responsibility to comment on political issues?
EG: Yes, they certainly do. Public figures wield significant influence and can shape public discourse. When they speak out, especially on matters of national importance, they can inspire conversations and encourage civic engagement. However, with that influence comes the responsibility to be informed and intentional with their words to avoid spreading misinformation.
TNE: Thank you, Dr. Giordano, for your insightful analysis. It’s clear that the intersections of culture and politics provoke important conversations that resonate within our society. We appreciate your thoughts today!
EG: Thank you for having me! It’s been a pleasure discussing this critical topic.