How did the credits fare this year?

by Laura Richards – Editor-in-Chief

In the first nine months of 2024, dollar bank financing to Argentina’s agricultural sector⁢ reached 40% of loans granted, the highest percentage in the last five years, according to a survey published by the rosario Stock Exchange.

This growth occurs in a context in which total financing to the sector, although⁣ recording a decline of 7% compared to the same ⁣period last year, remains high compared to the average of ‌the last five years, which ⁣amounts to 2,400 million dollars.

Field credits

In absolute terms, dollar loans grew 87% year over year, while peso loans fell 30%.

“The increase in dollar financing reflects a series of factors ⁢that include the greater availability of foreign currency deposits,the progressive deregulation of the foreign exchange market and a context of exchange stability,” ⁣explained‍ the authors of the Rosario Stock Exchange report (.BCR), Belén Maldonado and Julio Calzada

They explained that these conditions favored easier access to dollar credit.

The loans,​ which include a wide ⁤range of instruments from bank account advances to personal loans, totaled $2,662 million, of which $1,076 million was granted in foreign currency.

Despite the growth in dollar loans, analysts highlighted ⁣that the decline in total financing is mainly explained by the​ contraction of peso loans, which decreased⁣ by ⁢30%.

The analysis of agricultural financing

Maldonado and Calzada​ stressed that “the increase in dollar financing is the reflection of a structural change in the supply of bank credit” and noted that, although the ‌prospects for economic stabilization may maintain‍ this trend, the ⁣competitiveness of interest rates and monetary policy will continue to be key factors in the future evolution of agricultural credit.

Field credits

Over the ⁣last decade,the⁣ share of bank financing destined for the agricultural sector compared⁣ to total bank loans has fluctuated between 2.9%⁣ and 5.4%, with a marked increase in the last five years.

In 2023, the ⁢sector reached an all-time high, with an average share ‍of 5.2% of total loans,reaching a record peak of 5.4% in the third quarter of the year.

This increase was⁤ largely explained by the need for financing due to the poor harvest of the 2022/23 cycle, due to three consecutive years of drought, which led producers to depend even more on⁢ credit‍ to face the following campaign.

Though, this percentage fell to ‌4.7% in the ‌first three ⁢quarters of 2024, ⁢returning to‍ levels similar to those of 2020.

Field creditsField credits

Despite the large generation of foreign exchange by the agricultural sector, the ​participation of domestic banks⁢ in its financing remains relatively low.

Historically,⁤ manufacturers have turned to other sources of financing, such as capital ⁢markets and trade credit, due to the limited supply of bank credit for inputs and working capital.

Over the​ past decade, compliance ‌rates have remained high, between 90% and ⁣98%, reflecting strong ability to repay.

During 2024, the ⁤portfolio of debtors ⁣in a normal situation, without arrears exceeding​ 31 days,‌ stood at 97%.

Most ⁢notable, the drought crisis does not appear to ⁣have substantially affected repayment capacity,⁢ as default indicators remained above 96% throughout 2023.

What are ‌the‌ main⁣ causes behind the increase in dollar bank financing in argentina’s agricultural sector?

Interview: Time.news editor Talks with Agricultural Finance Expert on Argentina’s Growing Dollar Bank Financing

Editor: welcome to our Time.news interview series. Today, we’re diving into a meaningful development in Argentina’s agricultural sector, where​ dollar bank financing has surged to 40% of loans granted. To shed light on ⁣this topic, we have with us Dr. Lucia Gómez, an⁣ expert in⁢ agricultural economics. Dr. Gómez, thank you for joining us.

Dr. Gómez: thank you for having⁢ me! I’m excited to discuss the ⁣current state of Argentina’s agricultural financing.

Editor: Let’s‍ start with the big picture. Within the first nine months of 2024, dollar bank financing reached its highest percentage in five years. What do you think‍ are the driving forces​ behind this trend?

Dr. Gómez: Several​ factors are at play. Firstly,the‍ volatility of the Argentine peso has prompted many farmers⁢ and agribusinesses to seek dollar-denominated loans for ⁢security against inflation and currency devaluation. Additionally, ⁣the global agricultural market has seen fluctuating commodity prices, incentivizing producers ⁢to ⁤secure financing for both operational expenditure and investment in productivity improvements.

Editor: That’s‌ fascinating. Despite this increase in dollar financing, you also ‍mentioned that total financing⁤ to the agricultural sector has seen a decline of 7% compared to‍ last year.​ What do you think are the‍ implications of this ⁤figure?

Dr. Gómez: It’s a vital point to ⁤consider.⁤ While the percentage of dollar financing has risen,​ the⁣ overall decline in financing indicates challenges within the sector. One possible implication is that some financial institutions may be increasingly wary⁤ of lending, possibly due to economic uncertainties or risk assessments. This reduction could lead to tighter cash flows for ​farmers, impacting their ability to invest in essential areas, such ‍as technology or crop diversification.

Editor: ‍So, while farmers are adapting to currency fluctuations, they ⁣are also facing tighter lending conditions. how do you see this impacting production ⁣levels in the agricultural sector moving forward?

Dr.Gómez: If the trend of reduced overall financing continues, we may see stagnation or even decline in production levels. Access to credit is crucial for the sector, especially with Argentina being a significant player in global agricultural⁢ exports. If farmers aren’t able to invest properly due to a lack of funds, it could ultimately affect yield, productivity, and competitiveness in ⁢the global market.

Editor: Insightful analysis, Dr. Gómez. With a‌ five-year average of financing around 2,400 million, how does the ‌current scenario compare, and what should stakeholders be mindful of?

Dr. Gómez: ⁢Although financing has declined slightly this year, it’s essential to contextualize it within the overarching ⁢framework of global economic ‍conditions and local agricultural ‍policies. Stakeholders should be vigilant about maintaining⁤ financial health—exploring option⁣ funding mechanisms and diversifying crops ​to mitigate⁢ risks associated ⁢with fluctuating market conditions. It’s crucial that both farmers​ and lenders remain adaptable in this surroundings.

Editor: That adaptability seems key. what⁣ advice would you offer to farmers in Argentina who are navigating these⁢ uncertain waters?

Dr. Gómez: I would advise farmers to focus on⁣ building‌ strong relationships with their financial partners. Transparency about their needs and​ projections can lead to better tailored financing ​solutions. Additionally, they should consider leveraging technology for better agricultural⁢ practices, as ⁤this can lead to increased efficiency and, ultimately, better profitability—even in a fluctuating economic ⁤environment.

Editor: Thank you,Dr. Gómez, for your insights on ‍this complex topic. It certainly seems like a pivotal moment for Argentina’s agricultural sector. We appreciate your time and expertise!

Dr. Gómez: Thank you! It’s been a⁣ pleasure discussing these⁣ critically important issues.

You may also like

Leave a Comment