impunity guaranteed to forgers of the transition and unjustified incarceration reserved for former dignitaries [Mamadou Oury Diallo] – 2024-04-10 02:27:35

by times news cr

2024-04-10 02:27:35

Get real-time updates straight to your device, subscribe now.

Obviously the hand that was supposed toe not tremble in the face of misappropriation of public property, corruption and has all the anti-values ​​in Guinea, is still between heaven and earth.

On the evening of September 5, 2021, a fateful day for the regime of Professor Alpha CONDE, deposit, citizens in their entirety, ont welcomed the profession of faith ofs new strongmen of the country like a divine announcement.

So in his speech takingu power, Mamadi DOUMBOUYA appointed the JUSTICE as a compass for the transition that was opening up. Aware at the time of the exploitation that the overthrown regime had madee by part of the judicial system to achieve its ends, abuses of power of which political actors have been victimsues and civil society, the new masters of the country knew perfectly well that the Guineans, without the shadow ofno doubt,would believe without critical thinking, to their wonderful announcements.

The implementationin the process, of the court for the repression of economic and financial crimes (CRIEF)therefore encountered a great support of public opinion and of the Guinean taxpayer, eager to know what certain state agents, senior or less committed, have done with the public good whose management they was entrusted during the or mandates which have been given to them granted. At CRIEF then passed for materialization of willingness Umbrella How much salutary and unprecedented from the CNRD, that ‘’all public officials must account for their management’’.

But here is two years since former dignitaries of the overthrown regime were hauled off to prison forthat they appear before this court for some presumed acts of illicit enrichment, of embezzlement of public property, misappropriation and collision, organized crime, etc.… It has been two years since the same court struggled has clearly establish the responsibilities of the latter in all these financial crimes which they are accused of.

Meanwhile, two years since the CNRD gave responsibilities to new people he committedes here and there in the Guinean administration, with the mission of implement the spirit of the refoundation. Two years of alerts falling one after the other, to denounce financial scandalson the bottom of free marketsabusive consent. But the CNDR is simply content to look elsewhere. Oris Nwe only the decision-making and orientation body of the transition, but first on board it is especially he who took by force the apparatus of the State in hand, and promised to Guineans a radical change towards transparent and virtuous governance.

Following la dissolution recent of the government directed by Dr Bernard GOUMOU speak President of the transition, accompanied by draconian measures including collection of travel documents and company vehicles, the gel bank accounts, the ban on access at the offices, we logically expected surveys, questions, to subsequently build public opinion on ce what was the management of this team. Unfortunately, a large part a summerreappointed to the new government led by Bah Oury, therefore having automatic access to everything that was prohibited to them a few days before. Then among those not renewed, the former PM was immediately announced outside Guinea, while another former prime minister, notably Kassory Fofana, was just imprisoned. after the overthrow of the regime he served for related suspicionsfs to its management of public affairs. Accusations not yet proven.

Even more dramatice, a minister of the republicof the era of CNRD re-founderthey occurthis the minister of justice – compass of the transition – a declared in a widely reported release a social networks, that he was housed by and in the house of an economic operator in the country.

Better, he admits to his face to the nation that he was the subject,him and his family, very valiant graces and attentions from this businessman. What explanation willis it the fact that a public official on mission, therefore in office, benefits from the largesse, the gifts of a businessman who East regularly bid for public administration calls for tender? Doesn’t the obligation of probity require a public official not to use his or her functions for personal gain?

Know that this former minister of justice, compass of the transition, is currently outside Guineahim too. Meanwhile, former senior state officials spent two years in prison on charges includingthey deny responsibility. However, for now, justice is showing itself incapable to prove the opposite.

Brief, can we continue to think that justice remains the compass of transition? Let us agree that in light of what I have just listed, the answer is no.

You may also like

Leave a Comment